Jump to content

Matt Wieters to Boras: Keep me in Baltimore


fearthenoodle

Recommended Posts

Catcher Matt Wieters wants to work out a long-term contract extension with the Orioles, though he is not eligible for free agency until after the 2016 season. One source said Wieters wants to stay in Baltimore badly enough that he has asked agent Scott Boras to eschew his strategy of taking his players to free agency and instead strike a deal with the Orioles?a situation similar to that of Angels right-hander Jered Weaver and the Angels in 2011.

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=19516

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

But...but...Mitch Williams said he wants to run out of town first chance he gets...

Awesome. I wonder if he has to drop Boras to get it done.

Boras works for Wieters, ultimately it is Matt's decision. Boras isn't dumb enough to refuse and miss out on the prestige and commission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also from the linked piece:

While Wieters put together a .249/.329/.435 slash line with 23 home runs in 593 plate appearances in 2012, he had a .270 True Average and contributed 2.1 WARP, while his -2.2 Fielding Runs Above Average suggest he was not a Gold Glove-caliber defender. Wieters ranked ninth in WARP and 19th in FRAA among the 24 major-league catchers who had at least 300 plate appearances in 2012. A scout from an NL team, though, believes the Orioles should strongly consider signing Wieters to a long-term extension.

I hadn't realized FRAA was so down on Wieters' defense relative to other metrics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could be talked into buying out three years of FA. Would prefer two obviously.

But it sounds like we have four more seasons of Matt under contract. So what kind of numbers/deal are we talking about?

I love Matt and think he's essential, but to think we'd be paying him FA market value starting now, and for the next four years, plus another how many years?

I guess I'm just wondering exactly what we're talking about here in terms of possible numbers and years. It sounds pretty risky to buy out four seasons, just to secure 2-3 more years - IF you have to pay current market value for all those seasons, instead of arb, or whatever he'd get otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...