Jump to content

Reimold: The Look in His Eye


srock

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
"He can be a big player for us this year, something that a lot of people have forgotten about. We haven't, but also I'm not going to be constantly telling Nolan that, because he thinks that all of us have forgotten about Nolan."

Later, Showalter added, "You can see that look in his eye. He's friendly to me, but he's got that... Brady (Anderson) made a good point. He said, 'I'm not sure you want to take that away from him,' and I agree."

I think we may have found our MOOOOOOOOO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nate was signed to be the LF'er. I am sure Reimold may get some time at LF but most of his AB's will be DH'ing.

Nate was signed to be depth. Buck has made very clear that Spring Training is a time for competition. I would guess very few players have roles completely nailed down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nate was signed to be the LF'er. I am sure Reimold may get some time at LF but most of his AB's will be DH'ing.

I disagree. I think McLouth was signed to be the 4th outfielder. You don't sign a starting LF for what McLouth is making. If anybody else saw him as a starter he would have cost the O's more.

I also think that even if I am wrong and McLouth is anointed the starter if he plays like he did in Atlanta he will quickly become the 4th outfielder.

McLouth resurgence was a great story last year. I am not convinced he will be able to maintain that level of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. I think McLouth was signed to be the 4th outfielder. You don't sign a starting LF for what McLouth is making. If anybody else saw him as a starter he would have cost the O's more.

I also think that even if I am wrong and McLouth is anointed the starter if he plays like he did in Atlanta he will quickly become the 4th outfielder.

McLouth resurgence was a great story last year. I am not convinced he will be able to maintain that level of play.

I think that would be stating the obvious.

I belive Mclouth will be in LF since he is a great option as a leadoff hitter and has defensive value.

I thought his reasoning behind signing with the Os was he wanted to be able to prove that 2012 was not a fluke. He probably could have signed a bigger deal but would have been a 4th OF'er somewhere else and he did not want that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • That’s a lot cheaper than the alternatives.  Matz has kind of been up and down and has never been an innings eater.   He finished real strong his last six starts but a lat strain ended his season.  In some ways he has Oriole written all over him.   The fact that he’s 32 and his career high in IP is 160 makes me question if he really is their kind of guy.
    • If the team decided that Wells had just reached his innings limit and we just shut him down last year then I think the opinion of Wells’ 2023 season as a SP would be much different.  We need a SP and a high leverage reliever for next year. What role is Wells in 2023?  What’s best for Wells and the team long term?  Is this decision going to be about Wells, or more based on what FA takes our offer?  Whether that be a reliever or SP. People just write off Wells as a #5, but at the ASB you could make an argument for Wells, or Bradish, as who was our best SP. Wells was leading the AL in WHIP. Wells showed last year that he can be at least a #3 type of SP. Everyone has known since we took him in the Rule 5 draft that it was going to take some time to build him up to even 150-160 IP. Ok, so big deal… that didn’t happen in year two, and his first year starting full time. I don’t think the org just gives up on him as a SP like a lot have. I think he could be an All Star Closer. He would be our 3rd closer in a row to do that. That’s a very valuable role for us. But give me the SP that only gave up more than 3 ER three times in his first 18 starts. 
    • Matz is owed 2yr/$25 million. There’s no way that we’re paying that let alone trading for it. Trading isn’t a bad idea and I think it’s on the table for us if need be. 
    • Mathematically this makes no sense. Holiday is under team controls for at least 6 years and probably more because he hasn't played a single At Bat in the Majors yet.  So if you get 3 years of league minimum vs the $10M AAV, that's $27,840,000 MORE we are paying him in those 3 years. Let's add another $5M (assuming a $5M salary) in year4 / Arb1. Then another $3M (assuming a $7M salary) in year 5 Arb2.  Then let's assume he hits payday and gets $15M arbitration bucks in year 6. Subtract $5. Assuming the next 2 years would be free agent money of $25 per, we can Subtract $30M.   I was being generous with the arbitration guesses. And even then, the net result is that you're paying nearly an extra million dollars that you didn't have to, assuming all goes according to plan and he can play out the length of entire contract healthy. And assuming he's good. 
    • For me personally - this is my only source of information on the minor leagues and international players.   The reports and first hand accounts from posters and contributors on this board are a godsend for me.   I don't live anywhere near Baltimore, or the east coast for that matter, so I love to hear about the farm system.   This board is awesome.  Thanks to all who contribute and put me in my place when I'm wrong. 
    • I thoroughly enjoyed the too 30, especially the international players that are hard to get information on. I appreciate the hard work. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...