Jump to content

As JJ Hardy Struggles at ST Will Orioles Reconsider A Trade?


section18

Recommended Posts

I certainly do acknowledge when something is a small sample size, I do not, however, act like it never occurred at all. His 2006 season is part of his overall resume.

Hardy has had three seasons with an OPS+ of 81 or below, by the age of 29. Belanger at his best was better then Hardy at his worst. It would be foolish to just assume that Hardy will be a positive on offense as he continues to age.

That's right. And it would be foolish not to consider a return for him if one becomes available and we're out if it. He has value as a defender and that won't be diminished as quickly as will his offense. If we're out of contention it's an option that should and probably will be explored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I myself did state, in this thread, that I expect a slight rebound from him on offense.

I do think that the increased use of shifts is going to hurt his BA if he doesn't adapt.

And I don't know how well he'll do with that. He a dead pull hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly do acknowledge when something is a small sample size, I do not, however, act like it never occurred at all. His 2006 season is part of his overall resume.

Hardy has had three seasons with an OPS+ of 81 or below, by the age of 29. Belanger at his best was better then Hardy at his worst. It would be foolish to just assume that Hardy will be a positive on offense as he continues to age.

Nobody is assuming that Hardy will be a positive on offense as he ages. The Belanger analogy is poor and distracts from the point you are trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is assuming that Hardy will be a positive on offense as he ages. The Belanger analogy is poor and distracts from the point you are trying to make.

The Belanger analogy was in direct response to someone predicting a 210 BA next season. In the context of the thread I took that to be a near total offensive collapse. When you decided to call me on the comment I decided to show that Belanger's best years were in fact comparable to Hardy's down years. I took pains to show that was as far as I was taking the comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year wasn't even close to his best year of his career.

I don't think you are paying proper attention. The argument was if he was hitting .210 by June. That would be lower then last year. If his offensive numbers were lower then last season's then a comparison to Belanger would not be unreasonable.

In no way did I say that Hardy's average offensive season was comparable to Belanger's.

Folks do seem to want to overestimate Hardy's offensive ability, I think because of his power. A career OPS+ of 96 isn't exactly impressive.

Lower ERA than the year before, marginal difference in WAR from the previous year, best WHIP of his career, all in his first full season as closer. It's semantics between 2011 and 2012, but a case can absolutely be made it was the best year of his career, and I believe it was, because he's unlikely to do that again as a closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lower ERA than the year before, marginal difference in WAR from the previous year, best WHIP of his career, all in his first full season as closer. It's semantics between 2011 and 2012, but a case can absolutely be made it was the best year of his career, and I believe it was, because he's unlikely to do that again as a closer.

Sorry I thought you meant Hardy. You are correct that last year was pretty close to what he did in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I thought you meant Hardy. You are correct that last year was pretty close to what he did in 2011.

No biggie. I was using Johnson as an analogy of what a bad spring training looks like several months later. It happens all the time. Just the same as some of these guys have great spring trainings but you know they won't hit like that once they hit 60 games, or 100, let alone 162.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At his absolute worst, Hardy is a top notch defensive shortstop. There were years in the past in which a reliable glove at short was a revelation (see: Cesar Izturis). On top of that, he provides 15+ HR production on an annual basis from a high-value position.

Hardy is a streaky hitter. It isn't prudent to make decisions based off of this start. Hopefully he will be able to settle into a role lower down in the order and not be asked to do as much.

I think it is interesting that his best year offensively as an Oriole came the year after he was traded from the Twins. According to multiple reports, Gardenhire told Hardy to focus on hitting to RF, thus zapping his HR power to left. Perhaps there was still some remnants of that mentality present in his play in 2011. It's conjecture, but food for thought, nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A SS who will be one of the top 5 defenders in the game and give me 20+ HR a year? What's not to like? I'll take that from my #9 hitter.

It seems like some people want to ship Hardy out for any half decent offer. Its silly, because if Hardy's range does ever start to drop, then you switch Hardy to 3B, with Manny moving over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody has suggested giving Hardy away and I think I've read every response so far to my post. He is our most tradeable everyday player that can be replaced. Maybe not a gold glove replacement but very good replacement. Don't forget JJ is slow and doesn't get to some balls a speedier player would. His throws are almost automatic to first which is another plus factor in his favor. We need a right handed power bat. Reimold could be that guy. Could be......but will he stay in the lineup long enough to help us? We need a hitter or two that can hit Tampa pitching. How we do against them this year will play a major role in where we finish in the standings. I haven't checked the stats. How does Willingham do against the Rays?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious who the O's will plug at SS the next time Hardy goes on the DL. From what I've read the O's dont view Manny as a SS anymore. 3B only.

Easy, Flaherty or Casilla.

As for Manny not being a SS anymore... I'm hearing things along those same lines but I think it's a little foolish to count it as gospel yet. They haven't announced anything definite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...