Jump to content

Jake Arrieta going to be fifth starter surmises Roch (No Orioles Confirmation)


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

Jake Arrieta will be named the fifth starter according to Roch. What do you do think? Did Buck make the correct move here? As we all know, Jake might not be the fifth starter for very long and could end up in Norfolk in a hurry.

Here is a link to Roch's blog article:

http://www.masnsports.com/school_of_roch/2013/03/notes-and-quotes-following-todays-13-4-loss.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Jake Arrieta will be named the fifth starter according to Roch. What do you do think? Did Buck make the correct move here? As we all know' date=' Jake might not be the fifth starter for very long and could end up in Norfolk in a hurry.

Here is a link to Roch's blog article:

[url']http://www.masnsports.com/school_of_roch/2013/03/notes-and-quotes-following-todays-13-4-loss.html[/url]

Interesting that Roch would make that assumption. It's not too far fetched I guess, because if you put Jake in the rotation, then you have use for Matusz in the pen, whereas if you put Matusz in the rotation, you likely send Jake down for now.

Things are obviously unlikely to stay the way they are day 1. I really want Matusz to be the 5th starter, and don't want him relegated to the bullpen without getting another quality look as a starter, but I think Buck wants that too. Just potentially giving Jake a run at it first I guess.

The interesting piece is, where does McFarland end up in this? Do we trade Patton? I gotta think he has more value to us then he would in a trade..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C'mon Diehard, don't misquote Roch. Roch was simply reading the tea leaves, so to speak. He didn't actually flat out make the announcement as your post's title suggest. But let's see what Buck does with Brian's start. Seems to be a two horse race now. Although if neither one puts distance from the other, expect Brian to be in the pen so start the season since he's had success there. That's all the article was saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any chance DD looks to trade Ayala? He's the oldest one of the bunch & surely has peaked. This allows us to keep TJ and possess 3 LHP in the pen. Might be too much of a workload for O'Day/Hunter. Not sure how TJ's stuff plays vs righties. Just a thought....we don't have much of a hand in trades because team knows that we are handicapped by space. Oh depth...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone has to named. In the long (or possibly short) run the number 5 spot, or the 2-4 spots are likely to have some bumps along the way, hopefully not. Chen, Gonzalez and Tillman do not have a long history of success yet. This year will tell whether last year was an outlier or the real deal for those guys. Both Jake and Brian have had spurts of above average performances. Hopefully both have matured and can show they can be consistent starters again. We all have our favorites and many have strong stats to support your opinion. The truth is BS and DD juggle things pretty well (and sometimes suspiciously with the use of the DL) if the need arises. I just watch as a fan and wish all will before above with greatness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not for sure, but Roch as a point. If you are still evaluating him for a spot in the rotation why have him pitch in the minor league camp where he's not likely to be seen by Buck? More curious, if he's pitching in a minor league game, why not send him to the minors now if he's not making the team.

I don't mind Arrieta in the 5th spot, but I think Matsuz has earned it. He's been dominant. I just hope they are able to keep McFarland. Seems like a shame to lose him this early on in the process when he's shown he can help this team.

I think the opening day roster should be the one that allows you to put the best team on the field while also maintaining as much of your talent and depth in the organization as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the part everyone should take a look at. McFarland's splits were better against RH hitters than LH hitters in AAA. Some people talk about him replacing Patton or Matusz in the bullpen but he looks to be anything but a lefty specialist (not that Patton or Matusz really are as relievers). In a very SSS McFarland once again this spring, has had most of his trouble against LH hitters. For whatever reason, his stuff seems to play better against RH hitters. Maybe his staple, the sinker, runs away from RH's and back into LH's? I don't know. Haven't seen enough of him.

If he makes the team, it would probably be as a long man with Patton and/or Matusz as the lefty specialist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thread title should be changed, IMO. Roch has not reported that Arrieta will be named the fifth starter, he's just making an inference, same as RZNJ did when it was announced that Matusz would next start in a MiL game (a decision that was reversed later for reasons having nothing to do with Matusz). Roch may be right, but he's guessing, not reporting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If this was the 8th or 9th inning I would agree.  But to lose someone for the rest of the game in the 6th? Just leave Holliday in. He would’ve had another at bat against a righty later anyways. 
    • I think there's something else beyond the injuries,  but a person would have to be naive to think this lineup wouldn't be drastically different with even 2 of the RH hitters on that list. 
    • Also, our Bad Manager had Mullins bunt with men on 1st and 2nd and nobody out precisely…two games ago, on Sunday in Detroit. Fouled off the first two, then flied out rather meekly to center field (advancing the runners anyway on nice tag-ups by Soto and Henderson). But then Santander popped up and Kjerstad hit a weak tapper back to the pitcher, so we went empty. Gave up an out with one of our hottest hitters — just to set up two dudes who couldn’t come through. I didn’t see Hyde getting too much praise as a Good Manager for doing that on Sunday. If he’d gone right back to the same strategy that failed a couple days ago in the exact same situation, then we’d be telling him “job well done” this time? Only if it worked, I’d wager…
    • Different era obviously, but Rochester AAA manager Earl Weaver replaced O's skipper Hank Bauer in '68, just a year and a half after Bauer won the World Series. 
    • A good manager would have instructed him to bunt Well not for nothing, but I would like 100 dollars for every time a Good Manager did not bunt with first and second with nobody out. Now if the SF pitcher was LH, I would be onboard. If they were down by 1, maybe. Why would you not let Mullins hit there?
    • Putting aside the issue of “not counting” stats that don’t fit the argument, I’m curious who he would have had hit there. What were the other options? Eloy Jimenez (1 for his last 23) Coby Mayo (3 for 37 with 21 Ks as a pro) Jackson Holliday (0 for last 22 vs LHPs  with 12 Ks) Livan Soto (~.600 career AAA OPS vs LHPs)   Not saying Slater was some slam dunk pick, but I honestly don’t really even understand how folks can criticize Hyde for those types of decisions anymore. Every lever he has available to pull is clearly marked *WRONG* in flashing red lights. 
    • Is it really the injuries?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...