Jump to content

Jake Arrieta Today, 2013


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply
.

JAKE ARRIETA O (vs. DODGERS, 4/21)

IP:. 4 - Plus

H:o 2

R:O 5

BB: 5 *

SO: 6

Pitches: 91 (50 Strikes, 41 Balls)

2013 ERA: 6.63

* Arrieta also had 1 hit batsman.

Man I hope Buck has seen enough pitching lines like this to send him down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man I hope Buck has seen enough pitching lines like this to send him down.

He HATES having to use his bullpen for 4+ innings like this. And EVERY time Jake pitches, you're looking at at least 4 innings by the bullpen.

I would be surprised if Arrieta starts another game for the Orioles this season. And very angry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arrieta = AJ Burnett. He will tantalize you with the stuff and occassional greatness, but in the end you are better of trading him to someone who loves his upside and thinks they will be able to fix him. I am just worried it is too late for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps he could make the transition to the BP like Brian Matusz. The reality is that not every young talented pitcher is starter material for the major leagues. It takes a special kind of pitcher to go three times through a major-league lineup, something that may not be possible to assess at the lower levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arrieta = AJ Burnett. He will tantalize you with the stuff and occassional greatness, but in the end you are better of trading him to someone who loves his upside and thinks they will be able to fix him. I am just worried it is too late for that.

I would be thrilled if Arrieta were A.J. Burnett. I think you're not giving Burnett enough credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be thrilled if Arrieta were A.J. Burnett. I think you're not giving Burnett enough credit.

Agreed but get the gist of what he poster was saying.

Throughout the years I have seen some Jekyll and Hyde type pitcher but never one with the extremes that Jake goes through.

Personally I would send him down to AAA and perhaps consider moving him into the pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake is one of the dumber pitchers I've ever watched. I don't know how else to say it. He does this stuff to himself. He is in love with his stuff like a lot of other people and just forgets about who he is pitching to, the situation he is pitching in, the score, the relative competence / power of the batter, etc... He constantly tries to execute the perfect pitch and I believe his is strikeout happy. I'm not sure there is a "light" that can come on with this guy. I honestly think he is obsessed with himself. The constant hat and uniform tugs are part OCD but also part "I have to look perfect for the cameras" IMHO.

The awful thing is that his stuff is phenomenal, just ridiculous at times, so he is likely to have a lot of good games in his career despite himself so trading him just feels like selling low and waiting for pay for it later. I'd keep trying him out, but if he has 5 good starts in a row or so, I'd be trading him to the NL.

I have been hearing this about him since he was in high A ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake is one of the dumber pitchers I've ever watched. I don't know how else to say it. He does this stuff to himself. He is in love with his stuff like a lot of other people and just forgets about who he is pitching to, the situation he is pitching in, the score, the relative competence / power of the batter, etc... He constantly tries to execute the perfect pitch and I believe his is strikeout happy. I'm not sure there is a "light" that can come on with this guy. I honestly think he is obsessed with himself. The constant hat and uniform tugs are part OCD but also part "I have to look perfect for the cameras" IMHO.

The awful thing is that his stuff is phenomenal, just ridiculous at times, so he is likely to have a lot of good games in his career despite himself so trading him just feels like selling low and waiting for pay for it later. I'd keep trying him out, but if he has 5 good starts in a row or so, I'd be trading him to the NL.

I dont know about him being obsessed with himself. Conversations with him seem to indicate he gets that he is far from perfect

That said maybe your on to something with the OCD thing/trying to be perfect. It just feels like when men get on base he stops pitching the way he was and becomes all helter skelter. Could be an indication he is trying to hard to make the perfect pitch, get the k and not relying on his stuff and defense to help him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Honestly, this almost feels like a positive. Last year an outing like this might have had 4 or 5 walks. Hopefully this indicates a better ability to grind out a start without his best command. 
    • Yea that’s a lot of pitching.  Only 1 walk but the str% was just under 60%.
    • A few ideas:  McKenna has been around for a long time, Roch probably knows him pretty well.   Maybe he likes the guy.  It is a fact that Hyde (and likely Elias too) like to have a good mix of RH and LH bats, and take LH/RH splits very seriously.    We see it in their lineups, and in player moves, all the time.   It is clear based on the multitude of comments that come out each time a lineup is posted, that Hyde/Elias put a lot more stock in LH/RH splits than the majority of fans here do.   Whether you agree with them or not, the bottom line is it DOES matter to THEM, a lot.   And with Hays down, and now Burdick gone, our MLB/AAA pool of potential outfielders is VERY lefthanded, which means that McKenna probably has more value to them than he does in most our minds.   And Roch is just reflecting that value in his blog.   (When Hays got hurt, I wasn't 100% sure his replacement was going to be Kjerstad, I thought there was a chance, based on past behavior of Elias/Hyde, that it could be McKenna to get another RH bat in the mix). Perhaps Cowser has, or will, convince them that he can be an adequate backup CF if something happens to Mullins.   I don't know if that has happened yet.   But with Hays out, and Mateo so far not passing the eye test as a CF, it's possible that McKenna is still the #1 answer if something were to happen to Cedric.   Which gives him more significance than some other 4A guy who can be DFA'd 3 times in a season like Banuelos and pass through waivers or be easily replaced.
    • We smashed him pretty good last year and he’s due for regression. He’s an average pitcher that we should beat. 
    • Yeah, the limited IP so far is small.  But it feels like he's not at the right level of competition. Of course it's also as much competing against himself (pitch shape, location, etc. that the team tracks) as against the hitters too.  Like you mentioned elsewhere, he's younger than DeLeon.
    • I think they’d go with 4 lefties before sending Akin to AAA. If everyone is healthy: SP: Burnes, Grayson, Bradish, Kremer, Means/Irvin RP: Kimbrel, Cano, Coulombe, Perez, Akin, Suárez, Webb/Baumann, Irvin/Means Option: Wells, Tate DFA: Ramirez, Baumann/Webb And then if they want Wells, they either DFA the other of Webb/Baumann or option Akin.  They also have the ability to option Kremer, but he’s really have to pitch poorly for that to happen.
    • With Cowser hitting lefties ok so far, not a lot of reason for McKenna. Mateo has already played CF once as well, so they are covered down with defense in CF and Kjerstad brings a much better bat. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...