Jump to content

Arrieta's postgame comment


refjaf55

Recommended Posts

Guest rochester

Does anyone else get really, really tired about "he has a great arm but...?" I don't care if he has the 6 Million Dollar Man arm; it is worthless is he doesn't know how to use it. Someone brought up a great analogy with Miguel Gonz?lez, who is much better although he doesn't have that golden arm. I am not going to pretend I know what Arrieta feels when he makes statements like "I'm so close to being so good and everybody knows it. And that's what's frustrating." - but, he is not so close to being good, but is consistently frustrating and predictable. Some mention relief or (gasp!) closer. I say put out feelers and see what someone will give for someone who needs a well overused cliche of a "change of scenery" or send him down, hope he does well, and then try to maximize value - I don't believe "so close to being so good" is a reason to keep throwing him out there - close only counts in hand grenades and horseshoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yeah, I think he was projected for the 1st round but definitely not one of the top ten picks. I've never seen a scouting report that mentioned him as possibly being a dominant starting pitcher. You guys think Jake is the only starting pitcher who throws 93-95 and is inconsistent?

He is currently ranked 5 in MLB in average fastball velocity. So, yes, his skills are special. Last season he would have ranked 7 if he qualified.

As for his curveball, it would have ranked 3rd in vertical movement had he qualified, and 15th this season.

So, no, there aren't many pitchers that have two pitches that good. Hell, there aren't many people with 1 of the 2. The pitchers that do are pretty much all true aces.

Obviously the mental game is a skill too, and it doesn't look like he'll make it in that regard. For that matter, repeating your delivery is also a skill, and again he gets failing marks for that.

But you can't say that his raw stuff is dime-a-dozen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is currently ranked 5 in MLB in average fastball velocity. So, yes, his skills are special. Last season he would have ranked 7 if he qualified.

As for his curveball, it would have ranked 3rd in vertical movement had he qualified, and 15th this season.

So, no, there aren't many pitchers that have two pitches that good. Hell, there aren't many people with 1 of the 2.i The pitchers that do are pretty much all true aces.

Obviously the mental game is a skill too, and it doesn't look like he'll make it in that regard. For that matter, repeating your delivery is also a skill, and again he gets failing marks for that.

But you can't say that his raw stuff is dime-a-dozen.

He could rank #1 in both of those categories and it wouldn't matter. If you can't throw the ball for a strike when you have to, it's useless.

Where did Daniel Cabrera rank...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think he'd make a great reliever. He does have some great stuff... sometimes. It's very inconsistent though, as has been pointed out. Sometimes he's close. It sounds to me like he has a good grasp on things. Lots of confidence and awareness, but an admission that it isn't happening yet either. Some of you guys are just brutal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think he'd make a great reliever. He does have some great stuff... sometimes. It's very inconsistent though, as has been pointed out. Sometimes he's close. It sounds to me like he has a good grasp on things. Lots of confidence and awareness, but an admission that it isn't happening yet either. Some of you guys are just brutal.

I really hated losing that game that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He could rank #1 in both of those categories and it wouldn't matter. If you can't throw the ball for a strike when you have to, it's useless.

Where did Daniel Cabrera rank...?

You're right, of course, and I mentioned repeating his mechanics. But his pure stuff is undeniable.

Cabrera didn't have great movement on his curveball, actually. Arrieta's curveball blows away any of Cabrera's breaking pitches. Cabrera's fastball was #3 his first season, 15 2nd season, and not on the first page 3rd season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
Of course that doesn't mean that all those teams would be willing to put him into their rotation.

nor give up anything for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are my thoughts on Arrieta. His comments are a bit odd, but sort of fit with his pitching problem.. No, I am not saying it is odd for a pitcher to have great command for an inning or two and then totally lose it. Sidney Ponson and Daniel Cabrera were fine examples of that. What I am espousing is it is a bit odd or incongruous how he looks like he is a nervous wreck when he has even one base runner on, yet when he talks he seems supremely confident. His body language does not support his commentary which seems a bit slanted towards arrogance, even if true. The counter to what he is saying has been pointed out in that he is also very close to being out of baseball, just like Ponson and Cabrera, despite his electric stuff.

I wonder about two possibilities in helping Jake that may be considered:

1. Not sure if John Smoltz's sports psychologist is still around and practicing but perhaps some therapy could help.

2. After being sent down, why not have him start pitching all the time from the stretch, sort of how Tillman has simplified his windup. Since Arrietta clearly gets way out of sync when in the stretch, get him so used to pitching that way he will be confortable all the time. I noticed in his meltdown game that as soon as he had to go to the stretch he seemed to have no clue where his pitches were going. After he self-loaded the bases by not throwing strikes, and went back to the wind up, his first two pitches were in the strike zone. The problem was so was his pitch that caught too much of the plate for a two run single chasing him from the game.

Watching him pitch is pure torture as it must be playing behind him on defense. He is the "Kyle Boller" of the Orioels. Strong arm, but lousy accuracy, poise, and consistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nor give up anything for him.

Agreed, unrealistic to expect anything worthwhile in trade return for Arrieta at this point.

Some interesting statistics....

Arrieta's 1st time thru a lineup during his horrendous 2012 season (as SP) - 163 PA, .257/.302/.388 (.691 OPS)

Arrieta's 1st time thru a lineup during his horrendous 2012 season (as RP) - 46 PA, .205/.239/.432 (.671 OPS)

Arrieta's 1st time thru a lineup during his horrendous 2013 season (as SP) - 36 PA, .194/.306/.355 (.660 OPS)

Arrieta's 2nd time thru a lineup in 2012 - 162 PA, .299/.360/.438 (.798 OPS)

Arrieta's 3rd time thru a lineup in 2012 - 111 PA, .283/.345/.515 (.861 OPS)

Arrieta's 2nd time thru a lineup in 2013 - 36 PA, .280/.444/.560 (1.004 OPS)

Arrieta's 3rd time thru a lineup in 2013 - 15 PA, .182/.400/.182 (.582 OPS)

So you splice out this specific scenario, and Arrieta has been close to dominant even in seasons in which he was one of the worst pitchers in Major League Baseball.

Not really sure why this is - perhaps opposing batters are able to adjust to his stuff over multiple PA's or he has trouble maintaining focus for extended periods of time? But regardless the results are undeniable: Arrieta is a dominant pitcher his first time thru the lineup and one of the worst in the league thereafter.

Thus, I believe the O's greatest chance of salvaging any value from him is to convert him to a short reliever or closer. No changes necessary - Arrieta would simply need to continue his established level of performance the first time thru a lineup and he'd be an ace RP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, unrealistic to expect anything worthwhile in trade return for Arrieta at this point.

Some interesting statistics....

Arrieta's 1st time thru a lineup during his horrendous 2012 season (as SP) - 163 PA, .257/.302/.388 (.691 OPS)

Arrieta's 1st time thru a lineup during his horrendous 2012 season (as RP) - 46 PA, .205/.239/.432 (.671 OPS)

Arrieta's 1st time thru a lineup during his horrendous 2013 season (as SP) - 36 PA, .194/.306/.355 (.660 OPS)

Arrieta's 2nd time thru a lineup in 2012 - 162 PA, .299/.360/.438 (.798 OPS)

Arrieta's 3rd time thru a lineup in 2012 - 111 PA, .283/.345/.515 (.861 OPS)

Arrieta's 2nd time thru a lineup in 2013 - 36 PA, .280/.444/.560 (1.004 OPS)

Arrieta's 3rd time thru a lineup in 2013 - 15 PA, .182/.400/.182 (.582 OPS)

So you splice out this specific scenario, and Arrieta has been close to dominant even in seasons in which he was one of the worst pitchers in Major League Baseball.

Not really sure why this is - perhaps opposing batters are able to adjust to his stuff over multiple PA's or he has trouble maintaining focus for extended periods of time? But regardless the results are undeniable: Arrieta is a dominant pitcher his first time thru the lineup and one of the worst in the league thereafter.

Thus, I believe the O's greatest chance of salvaging any value from him is to convert him to a short reliever or closer. No changes necessary - Arrieta would simply need to continue his established level of performance the first time thru a lineup and he'd be an ace RP.

I don't have is similar stats but from watching him pitch a lot of games it seems like Sidney Ponson had the same problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have is similar stats but from watching him pitch a lot of games it seems like Sidney Ponson had the same problem.

Sidney Ponson had very good control. He also wore his emotions on his sleeve, but in my mind they mostly affected his pitch selection, not his mechanics. When Ponson got pissed, he would just chuck his fastball down the heart of the plate and stop trying to actually fool the batter.

Arrieta unravels mechanically when he gets pissed. He may also unravel in other aspects of the game, but we wouldn't know, because he throws his fastball 4 feet away from the strike zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Do we know what his velocity was today? I know he doesn't light up the gun but was he at his normal? 
    • Longterm he’s probably that missing RH SU/MR that we’ve been looking for since the Fuji trade.  It’s probably Suarez vs Ramírez vs Tate for 1-2 bullpen spots. Wells and one of Irvin/Means could be in the bullpen mix as well.  Depth is good to have. I wouldn’t sleep on Ramirez either. Elias has shown a knack from adding relievers through trade or waivers. 
    • There's not a single high level prospect on the team he pitched against tonight and even the one out he got was crushed
    • Let’s tap the brakes on his move to the bullpen. His stuff plays and he can get outs. Best of all, he doesn’t walk anyone. He challenges hitters and gets weak contact. With our defense, I’d rather him give up the occasional double or flared hit to the outfield than to see walks. Keep him in the starting rotation until he proves he doesn’t belong. Wells and Irvin both have experience in the pen and frankly for Irvin, though I love him, has a real tough time throwing strikes at times.    anyway, let’s see what the old dog can do.
    • I could see Suarez sticking in a bullpen role long term with the movement on his fastball. Also he might be able to throw a 2 to 3 more MPH harder not having to worry about trying to pitch six innings. The Orioles have done a good job finding pitchers who weren't expected to do much in recent years and it would be cool if Suarez is another find.
    • I mean, heres where we really find out if Holliday is cut out for the majors and if he has the character to fight through major adversity right off the bat right?  Saw a good point that there was a guy previously that started 4 of 55, and that was ole #8.  Mike Trout didnt get his batting average up to .200 until May 31st of his first season.  Ideal? Absolutely not.  But when the franchises all-time hits leader started with the same slump its something to pay attention to.
    • Going 1 for 25 is not hard to do. I would imagine many HS Senior players could do that if given 25 at bats in the big leagues. Not saying Holliday is not worthy, just how bad going 1 for 25 is. Had someone not been on 1st, he could be 0 for 25. I would like to see him more aggressive early in the count and more protective late in the count.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...