Jump to content

vs. Angels 5/4


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 656
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is horrible matchup. Easy winner for Halos only -145, taking the Halos. Hope, I lose. But Orioles with that battery of Garcia and Snyder vs Hanson is a no brainer. Plus, no Hamilton which is actually good for the Angels, he cant hit water falling out of a boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it. It has a certain lack of Davis and Wieters, though ...

I'm going to go out on a limb with a limb with a hunch .........

I'm going to assert that Freddy Garcia is pissed, and he wants to prove himself today to any doubters that presume that his best days are behind him, and that he has no chance to recapture them, not even for a few games.

He's going to pitch well today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the good news department, R.A. Dickey got rocked again (by SEA) and TOR is about to go 10-21. Toronto's spending spree is not looking so good and one would have figured this would be the year it would have payed off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...