Jump to content

Ryan Flaherty's OPS is now .385


Frobby

Recommended Posts

The thing about Flaherty is I've seen him absolutely scorch some balls...that end up foul by inches or into the 2nd basemen's glove. I'm seen him drive the ball to deep center field a couple times. I think he's starting to make solid contact.

However he takes multiple steps back by: swinging at the first pitch. Twice in his first 2 at bats. And making weak outs. Then striking out his 3rd at bat.

He's a mess. I know there's still something in that bat of his...but I don't know how much longer we can afford waiting for it to come out.

I'd imagine if Buck thought Navarro's glove was worthwhile he'd be up here yesterday. I have to think that Flaherty gets another week or so to figure things out...otherwise it's Casilla at 2B or Navarro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Does anyone pay attention to the park we play in? Flaherty has the potential to hit 15-20 hrs at OPCY. Given the fact that he plays defense as well as all the slap hitting alternatives, I say keep running him out there for another couple weeks at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen, as long as the team is winning, a lot of people, including myself, will put up with Flaherty's anemic offense. However, there will come a time when the offense goes into a lull and it starts to hurt having an automatic out in the lineup. Now, maybe Flaherty stops being an automatic out but so far so bad. But when we start losing a few close games by 3-2 and 4-3 scores, a lot more people will be calling for change, including myself. I like the idea of fixing the problem before it becomes a problem. This would be a perfect time to call up Navarro and give him a real opportunity, while at the same time, letting Flaherty try to get things back together in AAA. Navarro is hitting .421 in his last 10 games with a .522 OBP and a .579 slugging percentage. He's earned a callup and a chance.

While I half agree with that- here's the other side. What if you make the change now, and THEN we start losing? It could have nothing to do with Navarro, or whoever- but messing with a working formula, especially when you know Flaherty HAS THE POTENTIAL to do much better then he is right now, doesnt seem like a screaming necessity to me.

If he keeps struggling, and the team follows suit, then all of a sudden, a change is a must- and brings with it excitement, and an easier chance to "turn the page" and start fresh. I know last year, whenever we struggled, and a change was made, usually to our starting pitching, it always brought an extra bit of optimism that things would turn around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been watching Navarro down here in person as a Tides partial season ticket holder.

I've watched every O's game this season live on tv, caught 3 in person or through the magic of TiVo.

Right now, Navarro is playing head and shoulders above Flaherty. Norfolk is a pitchers park, it's nearly impossible to hit home runs without Davis power here, so taking that out of the equation, Navarro's numbers look even that much better than Flaherty's.

It's time to make the switch. Leaving Ryan out there to scuffle and struggle game after game isn't fair to him or the team.

Bring Navarro up, let him bat the first 7 or 8 innings and then if we have a lead, use Casilla as a defensive substitution at 2nd or if we are losing, pinch hit for him with Dickerson or one of our bench players and then let Casilla play defense afterwards.

But allowing Flaherty's black hole of nothingness to clog the bottom half of our lineup game after game is unexceptable.

Bring up Navarro or look for a trade. Arrieta and a lesser prospect should be offered all around the league for even a mediocre 2b at this point.

Think we can talk the Rangers into giving us Profar? Lol

They already have Kinsler and Andrus. They have no room for him.

Maybe a straight swap, Bundy for Profar.....what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm drawing the line now.
Why wait that long? It's criminal that Navarro isn't up yet.

First of all, if the O's sent him down today it would be OK with me. Two weeks of .385 OPS would be one thing. Five weeks of .585 OPS would be one thing. But five weeks of .385 OPS is really, really poor.

That said, I keep remembering that Nick Johnson was 0 for April* last year and then turned things around. So, if Buck wants to give Flaherty a few more weeks I'll roll with it. I wouldn't feel that way if Flaherty were playing mediocre defense, but his defense has been way better than I expected.

* Flaherty has had many more PA by now than Johnson had last April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been watching Navarro down here in person as a Tides partial season ticket holder.

I've watched every O's game this season live on tv, caught 3 in person or through the magic of TiVo.

Right now, Navarro is playing head and shoulders above Flaherty. Norfolk is a pitchers park, it's nearly impossible to hit home runs without Davis power here, so taking that out of the equation, Navarro's numbers look even that much better than Flaherty's.

It's time to make the switch. Leaving Ryan out there to scuffle and struggle game after game isn't fair to him or the team.

Bring Navarro up, let him bat the first 7 or 8 innings and then if we have a lead, use Casilla as a defensive substitution at 2nd or if we are losing, pinch hit for him with Dickerson

But allowing Flaherty's black hole of nothingness to clog the bottom half of our lineup game after game is unexceptable.

y

Can you enlighten us on Navarro's defense, since you've seen him play quite a bit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen, (and for the record, I've only seem about a 1/3 of the Tides home games so far this season and none of the road games obviously) he looks to be at least a competent second baseman.

He's never going to be mistaken for Jeff reboulet, but he's not a butcher either. I heard before the season the knock on him was he was overweight and slow, but he seems like he's been pretty quick to balls so far this season and hasn't had any problem turning double plays.

And given how much better his bat is than Flaherty's, I'd fully support a move to bring him up.

Like I said, he's been hitting quite a bit at the minor league level and his numbers would probably be even better if he wasn't in such an extreme pitchers park. Even arrieta puts up good numbers pitching at Harbor Park because hardly anything leaves the yard.

Navarro could put up serviceable numbers at second in the majors and play decent enough defense that he'd be an upgrade over RF.

Given Buck and Dan's history of making moves to better the team, I wouldn't be surprised to see them pull the trigger soon. Can't let Flaherty fall below the .100 mark this late in the season and keep his job. It's just unacceptable for a team with aspirations like this one currently has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's batting .307, slugging .455 and ops'ing .844 as a second baseman in a pitchers park.

He has 3 stolen bases, has 15 walks and only 20 k's, and leads the team in runs scored and sac fly's. He has 2 hr's and has only hit into one double play on the season.

He's committed 4 errors this season, however, so far this season he has played 2b, 3b, ss, rf and lf.

3 games in right, 1 in left, 2 at third base, 11 at ss and 12 at second.

Apparently he's a super utility player although I don't know if that helps or hurts him in this case since we basically need him for second base only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And certainly no offense to you Frobby!

Flash hater.

We have plenty of offense to carry Ryan for a while even. Give him PLENTY of time to find his speed in the Majors. He has plus power. See if he can find his stroke. His D is a PLUS on this team!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And certainly no offense to you Frobby!
Flash hater.

We have plenty of offense to carry Ryan for a while even. Give him PLENTY of time to find his speed in the Majors. He has plus power. See if he can find his stroke. His D is a PLUS on this team!

We have JJ at SS so a Belanger at 2nd will play just fine. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen, (and for the record, I've only seem about a 1/3 of the Tides home games so far this season and none of the road games obviously) he looks to be at least a competent second baseman.

He's never going to be mistaken for Jeff reboulet, but he's not a butcher either. I heard before the season the knock on him was he was overweight and slow, but he seems like he's been pretty quick to balls so far this season and hasn't had any problem turning double plays.

And given how much better his bat is than Flaherty's, I'd fully support a move to bring him up.

Like I said, he's been hitting quite a bit at the minor league level and his numbers would probably be even better if he wasn't in such an extreme pitchers park. Even arrieta puts up good numbers pitching at Harbor Park because hardly anything leaves the yard.

Navarro could put up serviceable numbers at second in the majors and play decent enough defense that he'd be an upgrade over RF.

Given Buck and Dan's history of making moves to better the team, I wouldn't be surprised to see them pull the trigger soon. Can't let Flaherty fall below the .100 mark this late in the season and keep his job. It's just unacceptable for a team with aspirations like this one currently has.

"He's never going to be mistaken for Jeff Reboulet" has to be one of the best unintentional insults I've ever heard, though it's fair to say Reboulet was an above average defender. But so long as Navarro's reasonably close to average defensively, it will soon be worthwhile to see if his hitting will translate to the majors this time around (unlike in his previous major league stints). They already have Casilla for those times when they opt for defense over offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...