Jump to content

Is Wieters a disappointment?


Bradysburns

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 260
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I was hoping against hope for some actual analysis - as in, what he does defensively and with handling pitchers makes up for it. Or... pointless quips are fine, too.

Do a search for this same thread from 2012, 2011, or 2010. I may have provided my opinion then. It hasn't changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping against hope for some actual analysis - as in, what he does defensively and with handling pitchers makes up for it. Or... pointless quips are fine, too.

Ehh, I'm fine with Wieters tangible skills as a defensive catcher, but he "handles pitchers and calls a great game" is a pretty pointless quip imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you for the most part Oldfan. But what he's doing from the left side of the plate this year, I dunno. Chris Hoiles broke out in his age 27 year and posted a career 833 OPS.

I love, love, love me some Wieters - but I don't know how much of that is his likability and intangibles, and how much is his performance. THe point being - will be be worth a mega-contract if his offense stays where it is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh, no reason for the snark. It's been discussed before, but not recently.

Just always amazes me how funny a game baseball is. Wieters was billed as a great bat with average defense. Instead, he has been the exact opposite.

I tend to think the "game-calling" aspect is overblown, but that's just me.

EDIT - Wow, posted almost the exact thing as CA-Oriole. Complete with the "eh" to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping against hope for some actual analysis - as in, what he does defensively and with handling pitchers makes up for it. Or... pointless quips are fine, too.

Disappointment doesn't have much to do with facts... it has more to do with subjective expectations.

If you expected Matt Wieters to be the greatest catcher the world has ever seen, disappointment is an apt word. If you expected him to be one of the best catchers in baseball and an anchor for a pitching staff that 25 other clubs would kill to have, then "disappointment" is petty and ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of our expectations? Absolutely.

In terms of what we paid for him and the value he has returned for that payment, what the average #5 pick in the draft contributes in value/WAR/what-have-you compared to what he has in value/WAR/what-have-you? Absolutely not.

But look, in terms of expectations, it's an open and shut case, IMO. If you came on here 5 years ago and said Matt Wieters was going to be a .750 OPS guy and among the top 3 catchers defensively in the game, I think 95% of the people on here would've said that's disappointing.

Of course, fans' expectations are not exactly the best gauge of reality (!); in reality we've gotten a pretty good deal out of the thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do a search for this same thread from 2012, 2011, or 2010. I may have provided my opinion then. It hasn't changed.

Ha - point taken. But why should I assume your opinion hasn't shifted with time? In other words, for me I would not say I'm disappointed yet, per se. If he continues at this pace offensively, I would probably be disappointed - and not throw a crazy-big contract at him like I would if he got that OPS up over 800 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • To be fair, for this team it's a 5-game playoff loss streak. They had nothing to do with the previous 5 losses. In 2014 they ran into a very talented and hot team in the ALCS. Last year, they lost to the eventual WS champions. In 2016 it was the Britton non-usage fiasco. Each one has their own set of circumstances. We will see how far KC goes this year, but who's to say they aren't last year's Rangers? If they are, then I will say that the Orioles have been unlucky in whom they have drawn in the playoffs.
    • There's no need to throw most of our guys strikes.  Adley used to be that guy where you had to throw him strikes or else he'd be a threat to get on base but between his old man back and his smokeshow girlfriend, that ability has vanished. I was hoping we were past the teams of Adam Jones and Mark Trumbo and guys who'd just swing at everything and post low OBPs and offenses that'd only score if they were homering, but here we are. Someone was saying last night that the Royals pitching wasn't impressive, I disagreed.  They obviously had good scouting and knew that a guy like Tony would chase high out of the zone and they pitched him that way almost exclusively.  I'm sure everyone knows that Mountcastle will swing at a low and outside slider and expand the zone with two strikes.  No, the Royals did a fantastic job of pitching to our swing happy dickheads, they knew exactly what to do...they had a game plan and they executed it perfectly.  
    • They are clearly more talented. That’s why they won more games with more significant injuries. Plenty of players over OPS+100 and that’s with slumps.    This series was about the Orioles, not the Royals. 
    • I know oh the pain knowing he could of been an Oriole. I would trade Adley and Henderson straight up for Witt knowing how great a player he is and the added addition to him being signed for the next decade. 
    • The moneyball analytical approach might get you a playoff series win or two, but more often than not the teams that spend end up in the WS. I know there are some outliers like AZ last year, but most WS teams have a larger payroll. 
    • It better not be. I will be willing to bet this team WILL NOT be back in the playoffs if Elias doesn't make significant improvements on this team and then as Tony has said now he is on the chopping block if this team takes a step back . 
    • Showalter had a 5 game playoff losing streak but he also won the 2012 WC game, lost in 5 games in an extremely close ALDS as the underdog, and swept the 2014 ALDS before that streak. He also never lost to a team in the playoffs that was sub .500 if you take out their record against the worst team of all time.  The injuries were brutal and the offense sucked. That’s not on Hyde. But again, the team seemed mentally broken the last 3 months and never recovered. I really don’t care if he stays or is gone, but what happens if they start next year the same way they finished last year? Or what happens if they miss the playoffs or make them and completely flop again? You can’t just waste another year. Not saying bringing him back would be a waste. You just hope that this time next year, there’s no questioning if they should have made a change. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...