Jump to content

Meltdown thread


crowmst3k!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He's almost as much to blame as Crow caused the hitting woes.

Just a different voice or point of view. I agree it's the players not the coaches, but its the coaches to fix the players. A week with out a win and suck the life out of a team. It can make a fan base go nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's almost as much to blame as Crow caused the hitting woes.

Just a different voice or point of view. I agree it's the players not the coaches, but its the coaches to fix the players. A week with out a win and suck the life out of a team. It can make a fan base go nuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One week of mediocre baseball and people think we're the St. Louis Browns. Never thought a winning season would sour this board like this.

Cause in their hearts most people know that many of the struggles this team are going through now are completely unnecessary even if they dont want to admit so openly.

We did nothing but wave goodbye to a guy who was a part of the success we had last year after years of being told when we were competitive we would go out and get what we need. Now we have DH issues that the guy we waved goodbye to could have helped.

Had we at least signed a viable 5th starter we would not be relying on a bunch of boderline MLB pitchers to fill 2/5th of our rotation. They would be filing one spot (the one Chens injury created). Injuries are predictable. Its why you don't fill your 5th spot with whatever sticks that you throw against the wall. You use that method to fill the slot created by injury

Many of the issues this team faces are issues that could and should have been addressed in the offseason. They chose to essentially do nothing and we are seeing the end result of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great post.

This is who they want to be and last season basically gives them the right to try again even though many knew the issues that lied ahead.

So Duquette can either hope that the ship rights itself or he can go out and try to bring in some reinforcements. However unlike last year I don't see the ship righting itself. Especially not with Boston back in the mix and Tampa coming on hot.

I think we are, by in large, in agreement here. The one caveat being that I sincerely believe that Duquette's hands are tied, financially. I don't feel that he deserves much of the blame if we were to want to assign blame, here.

As Steveo explained so well in the "Is anyone else starting to worry?" thread, this past off season and current problems facing the O's has Angelos's fingerprints all over it. I honestly believe that DD and Buck would have gone about this past off season and buildng of the roster differently if they had more financial support. As I said in the "worry" thread, if this team is to repeat last year and end up winners, it will have been done in spite of ownership. Not because of ownership. That being said, as we both agree on, this all seems like a real competitive disadvantage to the O's, though. Very little room for error, indeed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cause in their hearts most people know that many of the struggles this team are going through now are completely unnecessary even if they dont want to admit so openly.

We did nothing but wave goodbye to a guy who was a part of the success we had last year after years of being told when we were competitive we would go out and get what we need. Now we have DH issues that the guy we waved goodbye to could have helped.

Had we at least signed a viable 5th starter we would not be relying on a bunch of boderline MLB pitchers to fill 2/5th of our rotation. They would be filing one spot (the one Chens injury created). Injuries are predictable. Its why you don't fill your 5th spot with whatever sticks that you throw against the wall. You use that method to fill the slot created by injury

Many of the issues this team faces are issues that could and should have been addressed in the offseason. They chose to essentially do nothing and we are seeing the end result of it.

Oh yes, a team with Mark Reynolds and Joe Saunders would never scuffle. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, a team with Mark Reynolds and Joe Saunders would never scuffle. :rolleyes:

Poor way to look at his response. He didn't mention either player and they weren't the only options the O's had this past offseason.

That said, I don't see how letting Reynolds walk because you didn't want to pay him $6 million as a smart move. Where else was that money allocated in the team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That said, I don't see how letting Reynolds walk because you didn't want to pay him $6 million as a smart move.

He was let go because he did not want to primarily be a DH. Chris Davis must've felt the same way so Duquette had to pick. If money was a factor it's secondary to lineup constraints anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, a team with Mark Reynolds and Joe Saunders would never scuffle. :rolleyes:

Real bright response there.

For most the offseason DD talked about getting another bat and a SP. It didn't happen for whatever reason. But DD seemed to recognize the need.

Last but not least this team would be better with those two guys on it. Saunders may be struggling but he is a far more capable pitcher than Garcia, Stinson, Arrieta, Jurjjens. By the end of the season his numbers will bear that out. Reynolds for all his faults would look a good bit better in the lineup than what we are trotting out at DH. There were other guys beside Reynolds or Saunders who could have filled either role. But by all means keep believing that the right moves were made even when the evidence is staring you in the face they were not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Real bright response there.

For most the offseason DD talked about getting another bat and a SP. It didn't happen for whatever reason. But DD seemed to recognize the need.

It didn't happen because Duke weighed his options and didn't like them and decided to let it ride. Risks of either money or prospects did not justify likely rewards. There are 30 GMs in baseball who would like another bat and a starter. After gathering together Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, Cole Hamels, and Roy Oswalt, I bet Ruben Amaro Jr. sat in his office and tried to think of a way to replace Joe Blanton with Tim Lincecum. But if the price doesn't work, overpaying is usually a very bad option, and you just got to go with what you have.

Last but not least this team would be better with those two guys on it. Saunders may be struggling but he is a far more capable pitcher than Garcia, Stinson, Arrieta, Jurjjens.

Really? Saunders owns a 1.10 SO/BB and a 1.2 HR/9 and without checking his xBABIP and BABIP he's allowed 11.1 H/9. I'm not saying you're wrong that he's better than some of these guys (maybe all of them) but he's still earning $6.5 million to be slightly less terrible. He doesn't help our cause significantly if we have him. And remember his home park plays like a deadball era arena so between the 1.228 OPSa away and .464 OPSa home, I think it's fair to say he wouldn't be faring as well at Camden as he is in Safeco.

By the end of the season his numbers will bear that out. Reynolds for all his faults would look a good bit better in the lineup than what we are trotting out at DH.

It sounds like he didn't want to DH regularly. He's played 12 of his Indians games at DH and he's still managing to rack up some pretty bad defensive metrics when in the field.

There were other guys beside Reynolds or Saunders who could have filled either role. But by all means keep believing that the right moves were made even when the evidence is staring you in the face they were not.

This is 20/20 hindsight so if you're going to play that way, between Chris Davis and Mark Reynolds, I prefer Chris Davis at 1st and the evidence bares that out. Between Manny Machado and Mark Reynolds at 3rd I prefer Manny Machado and the evidence is staring me in the face that my hindsight is correct here too. Reynolds didn't want to DH. What's left?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was let go because he did not want to primarily be a DH. Chris Davis must've felt the same way so Duquette had to pick. If money was a factor it's secondary to lineup constraints anyway.

Reynolds has played 19 games at 1b, and 12 each at DH and 3B.

I don't see why Reynolds and Davis couldn't alternate between DH and 1B this year.

That said, the problem with this team isn't the offense. It's the SP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...