Jump to content

Is this why McPhail is delaying on Bedard?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If that deal would go down, I'd be very happy.

1. It might accelerate the Bedard process, but

2. It would get Melky, Hughes, and Kennedy out of NY

In 3 years or so when we're able to compete, I'd rather them have an aging Santana than three young studs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hank Steinbrenner is pondering "doing the Santana deal". That could mean upping the Yankees offer in terms of players. Maybe adding Kennedy to Hughes and Cabrera? (speculation by me)

A higher price for Santana could set a higher return for Bedard.

http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2008/01/04/the-latest-from-chairman-hank/

This is a situtation worth watching. "Young Boss" looks like he is establishing Angelos north. If this keeps up, Cashmen could be on his way out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that deal would go down, I'd be very happy.

1. It might accelerate the Bedard process, but

2. It would get Melky, Hughes, and Kennedy out of NY

In 3 years or so when we're able to compete, I'd rather them have an aging Santana than three young studs.

"Aging Santana"

Dude, theyll have Santana in his prime and replace the others with whoever the best available FA is. They stand to clear a great deal of payroll over the next couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i]Give Huff what he is asking for, he'll never come down to our offer (last offseason about now)

This was always based off of reported offers to him...Those reports were false.

Trade Trachsel for a 2nd tier prospect

Yea, who would have known the Cubs would be this stupid...No chance you thought we would get that package back for Trax.

We waited too long on Tejada; we should have traded him for Santana/Aybar when could have done it; we'll never get value for him now[/i]

Aybar/Santana had more value than the package we got(or at least as much value)...Easy to look at it in hindsight and even in hindsight, it is way to early.
These are five panic scenarios from just the past 365 days that turned out to be completely false. In all cases, the advocates of these positions would have paid more, gotten less, or done worse than what ended up happening. I think we've got a 6th panic scenario brewing right now that will blow these others out of the water. Some of us are reacting to a Seattle times story today that was already posted on here two previous times AND contains information that was blatantly from prior to XMas. Good stuff
It is more of a reaction based on the offer BB is hinting at saying is on the board.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. Thanks for supporting my post about how people make proclamations of "fact" criticizing things based on conjecture and newspaper filler that may or may not be true. There were multiple people arguing that we should give him several million more than he finally got because of these reports. These people were criticizing w/o full information and obviously would have overpaid if they were in this situation. So, maybe these people should learn to wait, watch, and listen rather than shoot off their mouth in hopes they don't look like fools yet again.
This is a discussion...People are going to discuss what is going on and what is said. We speculate all the time on here but ultimately, we can either discuss what is happening ot sit there with our thumbs up our asses and give this pathetic organization the benefit of the doubt..You choose whichever you want but to criticize others for discussing what is actualyl said and what is going on is absurd but typical.
You're missing the point. Of course I didn't know what we could get for Trachsel. Of course I think the Cubs were stupid. However, I wasn't the guy on here blasting the FO for signing him and holding on to him. I decided to wait and see what happened rather than jump the gun and overreact. What happened was that the FO pulled off a major coup in that trade.
Good for you!
Please tell me you don't believe this statement. There is absolutely no way that Aybar/Santana has nearly the value of what we got in return for Tejada. If you want I'll prove it with analysis (again), but I don't think you want to go there.
AT THE TIME OF THAT DEAl, the package of Aybar/Santana was very similar to what we ended up getting.

This is no offense to BB, because I would have a hard time being impartial right now too if I was in his situation, but it is pretty clear he isn't and hasn't been a fan of MacPhail from the start. His analysis just doesn't appear to be impartial at the moment.

So you think BB is making up that package? You think he is lying? Essentially, that is what you are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
i]Give Huff what he is asking for, he'll never come down to our offer (last offseason about now)

This was always based off of reported offers to him...Those reports were false.

Trade Trachsel for a 2nd tier prospect

Yea, who would have known the Cubs would be this stupid...No chance you thought we would get that package back for Trax.

We waited too long on Tejada; we should have traded him for Santana/Aybar when could have done it; we'll never get value for him now[/i]

Aybar/Santana had more value than the package we got(or at least as much value)...Easy to look at it in hindsight and even in hindsight, it is way to early.

These are five panic scenarios from just the past 365 days that turned out to be completely false. In all cases, the advocates of these positions would have paid more, gotten less, or done worse than what ended up happening. I think we've got a 6th panic scenario brewing right now that will blow these others out of the water. Some of us are reacting to a Seattle times story today that was already posted on here two previous times AND contains information that was blatantly from prior to XMas. Good stuff

It is more of a reaction based on the offer BB is hinting at saying is on the board.

I completely agree with VATech.

1) Huff - reported, reported, reported...what makes OH great is the debate based on reports....as long as they are hypothetical based on reports.

2) Trax - Verifies the above - if the consensus on OH was that Trax was worth a 2nd tier prospect then it shows how unpredictable it can be. I am not sure that the Cubs were THAT stupid. I mean, the package was fine but don't see anything earth shattering...I mean, if they gave up someone like Pie for Trax then one could assume it was stupid but...

3) Tejada - IMO, I agree that we waited too long, not necessarily because of his production (or lack thereof/fielding) but his attitude. How it plays out is to be seen but thought these discussions had/have merit - not necessarily panic. My own personal issue about this is the fact that I am tired of seeing Aybar/Santana everywhere on OH - I was waiting to hear how they did in Iowa the other night - fatigue (not saying that is even close to being right)

4) Reaction to BB - I am always a big advocate of BB's - always enjoyed his information and insight...but sometimes we all panic when a "fwiw" is posted. I respectfully disagree with the 6 weeks until P&Cs report thread that created panic as if nothing is happening nor is going to. But instead of going off on AM because I believe that it does not make sense, I kinda took it as BB having a bad day...being a bit cranky and anxious (as we all are). The Fio thing was similar.

But then again...I could be wrong..:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
This is no offense to BB, because I would have a hard time being impartial right now too if I was in his situation, but it is pretty clear he isn't and hasn't been a fan of MacPhail from the start. His analysis just doesn't appear to be impartial at the moment.

So you think BB is making up that package? You think he is lying? Essentially, that is what you are saying.

SG - you are better than that... just posted something similar but a different take. However, let's be honest, it has been readily apparent from the beginning that BB has not always given AM a fair shot. Saying that, this was not entirely inconsistent with past FO's. I can not speak for VaTech but I do not believe nor accuse someone with integrity of lying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SG - you are better than that... just posted something similar but a different take. However, let's be honest, it has been readily apparent from the beginning that BB has not always given AM a fair shot. Saying that, this was not entirely inconsistent with past FO's. I can not speak for VaTech but I do not believe nor accuse someone with integrity of lying.

That may be true about BB but unless he is just speculating or throwing a package out there for discussion, he isn't making up the offer with intent to bash AM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, that isn't what I'm saying. BB's source, by his own admission, is not nearly as in the loop as he used to be. His source is also looking at losing his job soon. It would be easy to imagine a situation where his source is now connecting dots a lot more than he used to have to and that his bent while connecting those dots is negative. Now, I don't know if that is true at all. It is interesting that the info coming from Peace, Belkast, Dynamite, and Sonny76 hasn't really matched the info coming from BB's source lately (different subject matters is what I mean). Most of the stuff from BB's source has been very peripheral stuff lately. It appeared BB's source didn't know a lot about the Tejada trade based on the posts from that time period (though there could be another explanation).

BB doesn't have to get more specific if he doesn't want to (and I'll never pester him), but his statement about this deal was very cryptic IMO so I'm not taking it at face value until I see more info from another source or clarification. Again, I would be upset too if I was BB and my source for info was being boxed out of the game so I don't want this to appear like I'm negative on BB. I have really appreciated all the info he has posted over the years and what has happened sucks for him and his source.

What!?!? And you accuse others of too much speculation. Give me a break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. Thanks for supporting my post about how people make proclamations of "fact" criticizing things based on conjecture and newspaper filler that may or may not be true. There were multiple people arguing that we should give him several million more than he finally got because of these reports. These people were criticizing w/o full information and obviously would have overpaid if they were in this situation. So, maybe these people should learn to wait, watch, and listen rather than shoot off their mouth in hopes they don't look like fools yet again.

You're missing the point. Of course I didn't know what we could get for Trachsel. Of course I think the Cubs were stupid. However, I wasn't the guy on here blasting the FO for signing him and holding on to him. I decided to wait and see what happened rather than jump the gun and overreact. What happened was that the FO pulled off a major coup in that trade.

Please tell me you don't believe this statement. There is absolutely no way that Aybar/Santana has nearly the value of what we got in return for Tejada. If you want I'll prove it with analysis (again), but I don't think you want to go there.

And again, you're proving my point with your "it is too early to tell" stuff. It wasn't too early to criticize them repeatedly for not making that deal at the time. Now, 18 months later, everyone is thankful we didn't make that deal for a pitcher who got demoted to the minors last year and a former "prospect" who would no longer rank anywhere near the top 100 if he was still eligible. Heck, he posted an OPS that was positively Luis Hernandezesque in over 200 plate appearances with the Angels last year (568).

This is no offense to BB, because I would have a hard time being impartial right now too if I was in his situation, but it is pretty clear he isn't and hasn't been a fan of MacPhail from the start. His analysis just doesn't appear to be impartial at the moment.

No offense to SG or BB, but Vatech has just hit back to back to back home runs with these assessments/statements. IMO, excellent posts.;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get how people can still be HOMERS. Ten years of loosing and terrible decision making has wiped away all my faith in this team. I don't care that we have a new gm. Big daddy Pete is still the owner. Maybe AM will get some good deals done by the start of the season.... We will not know until then.

However I refuse to believe a nice return for Bedard and Roberts can not be had right now. And if we go into the season with Bedard and Roberts on this team it is a BIG mistake. Too many negative things could happen leaving Andy with his pants down. Not getting deals done now will limit value and probably set us back another few years.

I'm still trying to hold out hope but I'm not expecting anything to happen nor would I be surprised if we were left with our pants down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
I don't get how people can still be HOMERS. Ten years of loosing and terrible decision making has wiped away all my faith in this team. I don't care that we have a new gm. Big daddy Pete is still the owner. Maybe AM will get some good deals done by the start of the season.... We will not know until then.

However I refuse to believe a nice return for Bedard and Roberts can not be had right now. And if we go into the season with Bedard and Roberts on this team it is a BIG mistake. Too many negative things could happen leaving Andy with his pants down. Not getting deals done now will limit value and probably set us back another few years.

I'm still trying to hold out hope but I'm not expecting anything to happen nor would I be surprised if we were left with our pants down.

Wow - now I'm depressed....

Try being a fan of the Buffalo Bills (I am and still a homer - after the 2nd SuperBowl I could no longer answer my phone after the game...and for days afterward - just too painful), Chicago Cubs (not really but have to needle Davearm a bit:D - who I hope is still a Cubs homer).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get how people can still be HOMERS. Ten years of loosing and terrible decision making has wiped away all my faith in this team. I don't care that we have a new gm. Big daddy Pete is still the owner. Maybe AM will get some good deals done by the start of the season.... We will not know until then.

However I refuse to believe a nice return for Bedard and Roberts can not be had right now. And if we go into the season with Bedard and Roberts on this team it is a BIG mistake. Too many negative things could happen leaving Andy with his pants down. Not getting deals done now will limit value and probably set us back another few years.

I'm still trying to hold out hope but I'm not expecting anything to happen nor would I be surprised if we were left with our pants down.

What too many people don't seem to comprehend is that Bedard and Roberts are our ONLY real trading chips. It is imperative that MacPhail gets the "best" deal for them, not just a "nice" one, like what he got for Tejada. Thankfully, he appears to realize this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Three hits for Samuel Basallo adjusting to AAA on a night tempting one to turn the seriousness knob on the joke that "you haven't been Raysian until you use someone in the postseason and send them to AAA the next spring" from 0% to 1%. There's still 2+ weeks of baseball before Festivus and I'm not sure if Ryan O'Hearn or a third of the lineup is better than Samuel Basallo today.
    • It is what it is. Some say fire Hyde - hell fire everybody it isn't giong to change. Earl couldn't win with this team. Heck he'd have a stroke with the umpiring. Injuries happen but this year has been special in a very negative way. Just suppose we entered September with a rotation of Burnes, Eflin, Bradish, GRod, Kramer/Suarez. That's not even counting Means or Wells. I have no idea why Adley has fallen off the cliff or Cowser and Holliday look lost. Even Gunnar had a spell. 2024 has turned into a disaster on both sides of the ball that will carry into next season. Elias will have to replan more than pitching. Watching this team, I feel like I'm almost back in the "tank years." Yet we will probably make the playoffs. If we do more than that, Hyde ought to be Manager of The Year for Life. And yet this team - this game can turn on a dime. I'm waiting - I'm hoping - but I'm not holding my breath.
    • It’s impossible to say who the best candidates would be without going through the full process. It’s not like speculating on who our center fielder should be where we can more directly observe skills and job performance. The long list would likely include the following: Terry Francona, former Guardians manager Buck Britton, Norfolk Tides manager Skip Schumaker, Marlins manager Gabe Kapler, Marlins assistant GM Rodney Linares, Rays bench coach Ryan Flaherty, Cubs bench coach George Lombard, Tigers bench coach DeMarlo Hale, Blue Jays associate manager Brad Ausmus, Yankees bench coach Mark DeRosa, MLB Network analyst and former WBC manager Rickie Weeks Jr., Brewers associate manager  Caleb Cotham, Phillies pitching coach Will Venable, Rangers associate manager Bobby Dickerson, Phillies infield coach Matt Tuiasosopo, Braves third base coach Clayton McCullough, Dodgers first base coach David Ross, former Cubs manager Don Kelly, Pirates bench coach Mark Hallberg, Giants third base coach Craig Albernaz, Guardians bench coach Kai Correa, Guardians infield coordinator Mark Budzinski, Blue Jays first baseman coach Fredi González, Orioles bench coach Ramón Vázquez, Red Sox bench coach Mike Napoli, Red Sox first base coach
    • If we do get Westburg, Mounty, Kjerstad and Urias back and they are all hitting on all cylinders then I agree with you we have as good a shot as anyone. But the clock is ticking- it sounds like Mounty wont be back this year at all. Westburg is dealing with an injury thats pretty important for swinging a bat. Kjerstad has been solid but is still a bit of an unknown. And Urias was bad most of the year but was awesome in August. 
    • I don’t think Hyde will be fired or should be fired.  If we go 0-5 vs Tigers and 3-6 vs Giants/Yankees/Twins to miss playoffs, then that probably changes.   That being said, I’ll engage the OP on the basis of the hypothetical. I don’t think a managerial search would focus on a “name” or someone that would “excite” the fans.  That doesn’t fit the trend in the game where quality orgs hire relative unknowns like Kevin Cash, Carlos Mendoza, Stephen Vogt, and Matt Quartraro. Instead, it would be an in-depth and structured search. It would start with a very broad list. Based on conversations around the league, it would be whittled to a list of finalists for in-depth interviews. Candidates would be evaluated across a range of criteria: - Background: managing/coaching experience, pedigree (e.g., worked under good manager), FO experience, playing experience, and age - Leadership and clubhouse management: Ability to win trust and respect of players, ability to motivate, can connect with players on personal level, ability to manage clubhouse personalities, ability to reduce vet playing time or send rookies back to AAA while keeping players motivated and bought into to team concept, feel for when a smart short term tactic may have detrimental clubhouse impacts that may outweigh benefit, feel for when disciplinary actions are helpful, feel for having players backs with umps, defend in public and criticize in private, good at giving feedback, character/reputation, Spanish language skills are a plus  - Communications and media relations: Clear, confident, and savvy communicator with media; ability to clearly communicate concepts and philosophies throughout org  - Managerial competencies: ability to build and lead a coaching staff, willingness to delegate, work ethic and depth of prep, ability to coordinate with minor league staff, advance scouting/analytics, others in org, evidence-based and open to new ideas, takes feedback well - Depth of knowledge of baseball fundamentals - Player development chops (dev doesn’t end in minors anymore) - Fluency in analytics: understanding of concepts, ability to communicate and filter info to players, depth of understanding and feel for game to understand when to “overrule” analytics, growth mindset and constant learning  - Ability and willingness to work closely with FO  - Tactics: bullpen management, lineup construction and load management, pinch-hitting and defensive replacements, small ball tactics (base stealing, bunts, hit and runs), defensive positioning, knowledge of rule book Gaps in tactical experience can be offset with the right bench coach.  
    • Dylan Crews robbed him on a 24/30 ballparks HR in the highlight of the game last night. The Marlins are probably NL East last place indefinitely - we know in 2026 a team like the Orioles will want Sandy Alcantara, and Norby and Stowers have a good opportunity to play themselves into players playoff contenders would want to give roles too.
    • Thats kind of my point though- the Orioles of May and June certainly had the ability to catch fire and win it all. This is not the same team. And not the same team in the sense that guys are struggling, this is not the same team in the sense that its literally new players who are not as good. Theres a big difference in Marcus Semien, Corey Seager, Adolis Garcia, Jonah Heim, Evan Carter, Josh Jung, and Nathaniel Lowe catching fire and Rivera, Jimenez, Maton and O'Hearn.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...