Jump to content

Tacoma News Tribune-Bedard Trade Status


TheBee

Recommended Posts

Well said....we are all extremely anxious to get this started... I do not want to wait for ST or (gulp!) the dreaded deadline....but I also do not want not get back enough.

The bad thing about waiting until the deadline is that you probably won't get many major-league ready pieces back at that time. Teams always run into injuries during the course of a year. Chances are some of these guys are going to be called up and won't be able to be traded at that point.

I'm just thinking out loud here...but if Seattle would lose a pitcher during the season, and Morrow is at AAA, chances are he will be a vital piece to their bullpen, or in their rotation...so there'd be little to no chance of him coming back as part of a package.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
AM needs to move beyond the Morrow piece. The other pieces of the deal are pretty solid so far. And if they add Tillman and Sherrill its a good deal.

There is hope that he might do that, as he finally dropped his demand for Bruce after a month, but it seems he was too late in doing that because the Reds moved on right after. Hopefully the same thing doesn't happen with the Mariners. The key is to keep the Angels in it.

I heard Callis say on XM today that he expected either Boston or Anahiem to land Santana so if they get him before Bedard is dealt, the suitors for Bedard goes down to two and both in opposite leagues not to mention not in the same division. The only way to maximize the return for Bedard is to deal him to the Angels or Mariners, so we've got to act before the Angels start pursuing Santana more aggressively...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jones, Clement, Tillman and Sherrill are on the board, do you make that deal?

If it's Jones, Clement, Aumont, and Mickolio do you? The article just said pitching prospects, didn't say which ones, and Sherrill isn't a prospect BTW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is hope that he might do that, as he finally dropped his demand for Bruce after a month, but it seems he was too late in doing that because the Reds moved on right after. Hopefully the same thing doesn't happen with the Mariners. The key is to keep the Angels in it.

I heard Callis say on XM today that he expected either Boston or Anahiem to land Santana so if they get him before Bedard is dealt, the suitors for Bedard goes down to two and both in opposite leagues not to mention not in the same division. The only way to maximize the return for Bedard is to deal him to the Angels or Mariners, so we've got to act before the Angels start pursuing Santana more aggressively...

I don't expect the Mariners to lose interest. What we have going for us with Seattle is that, apart from Santana, there really is no other guy who realistically makes the Mariners a contender.

With the A's getting thoroughly blown up, it really is down to two teams in that division, probably for the next two seasons. With Bedard, the Mariners are in the race; without him... probably not.

That to me is a powerful incentive that will probably keep the M's in play for as long as MacPhail wants to play the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Aumont get drafted this past year???

He certainly did. And I know the Orioles were high on him too. Of course that was before Wieters fell to them at #5...

Could Aumont be named as a PTBNL? We'd be replacing one Canuck with another Canuck. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just saw on a Mariners board that one of their insiders has said the Orioles have asked for Morrow, Clement, Jones and Sherrill. They are opposed to Morrow. If we were ok with Tillman, I would assume the deal gets done.

Which board is it? Please post the link to this.

How credible is their insider?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He certainly did. And I know the Orioles were high on him too. Of course that was before Wieters fell to them at #5...

Could Aumont be named as a PTBNL? We'd be replacing one Canuck with another Canuck. :D

The idea of a PTBNL that was just chosen in this past draft has been raised by myself and a few others recently, and there is merit to both sides of the debate that it makes sense to try that. I for one love the idea, and believe it is legal.

A deal of CF Jones, C Clement, LHRP Sherrill, and RHSP Aumont works for me. Everyone would be happy then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's Jones, Clement, Aumont, and Mickolio do you? The article just said pitching prospects, didn't say which ones, and Sherrill isn't a prospect BTW.

I would ask for Jones , Clement, Chen , & Aumont!

I honestley think Chen would be better for us than Clement. I believe it opens the door for Roberts.

Then they would have Roberts for Murton,Patterson, & Gallagher

They would have the outfield of the future locked in Markakis, Jones, Scott, & Murton.

Chen & Patterson in the middle. (they would be a 1B & 3B away from a real rebuilding pan)

Kinda gets you excited about it!

They then trade Clement for another piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which board is it? Please post the link to this.

How credible is their insider?

It was mentioned by someone on the Mariners board on Scout.com.

No idea how valid the source is or not but the idea that we are asking for that makes total sense for what has been reported, both by our insiders and nationally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherrill is icing on the cake....Bedard for Jones, Clement and Tillman is a fair offer.

No offense, but I think we have to give our front office a little more credit than this. I have never seen Tillman pitch. And I assume they have. Yes, you can go by stats, various ratings, etc... but I would hope that the Orioles are making their own evaluations of players. Maybe there is something about Tillman that they don't like--something that doesn't show up in the stats or in the various player reviews available on the internet (which even you must admit tend to be less reliable for lower level minor leaguers--people complain about their accuracy on this Board related to Oriole prospects all of the time).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense, but I think we have to give our front office a little more credit than this. I have never seen Tillman pitch. And I assume they have. Yes, you can go by stats, various ratings, etc... but I would hope that the Orioles are making their own evaluations of players. Maybe there is something about Tillman that they don't like--something that doesn't show up in the stats or in the various player reviews available on the internet (which even you must admit tend to be less reliable for lower level minor leaguers--people complain about their accuracy on this Board related to Oriole prospects all of the time).

His status as a prospect, his age, his stuff, his stats at a young age and his projectability are all enough for him to be a solid third piece to the puzzle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Regarding the overall league offensive environment, I think it’s less injuries/depth and more to do with putridness of CWS and MIA offenses, with COL not much better.  Those three are wRC+ of 62, 67, 75 respectively. Most years shake out with the worst team around 80. FYI the Os are currently 127 wRC+ only trailing the LAD 128.  Also note that Os are second in BSR, only trailing CIN, with CIN, Os, KCR significantly better than rest of league. 
    • Yeah, I was looking at our OPS numbers last night. Updated for today, we have two guys over 1.000, four guys over .900, and eight guys .736 (116 OPS+) or higher. So almost our entire lineup is above average or better with four guys producing at an elite level.  Cowser 1.139/232 Gunnar 1.022/199 Westburg .941/176 O'Hearn .938/175 Mountcastle .866/157 Rutschman .786/135 Santander .741/118 Mullins .736/116 We also have Mateo off the bench at .746/120 and McCann .667/96, slightly below average but not too shabby for a backup C.  Whenever I get the road announcers, they are always talking up our offense. Even when we are down, whenever we get a couple runners they say "here comes that Orioles offense again, they are relentless and they are never out of a game."
    • The Orioles have a wRC+ as a team of 128, which is better than the wRC+ for any single Orioles hitter last year - Adley was 127 and Gunnar 123 (although Hicks was 129 in his ~200 ABs). That’s the second best in baseball, behind only Atlanta at 128, and a good bit ahead of the Dodgers at 122, who are both riding unsustainably high BABIPs (.340 and .328; by comparison, league average is .290 and the Orioles are .294).  Despite walking at a very low rate as a team, the Orioles are doing it by being by far the best power hitting team in baseball. Their .199 ISO is far ahead of the Braves second at .184, and the league average is .143. I think power numbers usually go up as weather gets warmer too, so that should only increase. The top team wRC+ last year were the Braves at 125, and then 4 teams between 112 and 118. So the Orioles will almost certainly cool off to some degree. But I also think we could see the walk rate tick up as the scouting reports adjust - Gunnar, Westburg and Cowser in particular have been hitting for huge power at low walk rates (for Cowser, until 3 walks last night), so I could see there being a trade off of walks for less power if pitchers are more careful pitching in-zone to them going forward. 
    • But when Santander gets hot or Adley goes on a power run someone else might start slumping. Cowser is not going to have a 1.139 OPS forever, nor will Mountcastle likely end the year with a .385 OBP. I think this offense is about as good as anyone could have hoped for.
    • It's been well noted that Kimbrel isn't great at holding runners and can be run on.  Given Adell's 91% sprint speed (yes, I know stolen base technique is something else altogether) I thought letting him run wasn't a bad move. He had a hell of a jump, I was surprised that the play was as close as it was.
    • I'd like to see him promoted soon to see how his limited # of bullets perform this year against better competition.  
    • Unless we cannot sign Gunnar/Adley/Holliday whatsoever (because they are simply uninterested at any dollar amount), I don’t want to tie any significant dollar amount that could be going to them in future years on a player like Mullins (good not great).
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...