Jump to content

What kind of punishment are you expecting for Hammel?


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

Idiot. Push your agenda all you want. You're wrong. Diametrically opposed to being CLOSE to right.

No reason to call him a Idiot. Even if he is wrong he's at least trying to explain his thoughts on the matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-on-baseball/22338595/jason-hammel-gives-up-three-straight-homers-plunks-next-guy-gets-tossed

This article explains it well.

"My own conspiracy theory is that pitchers do this -- "this" being go to the off-speed stuff -- precisely for purposes of plausible deniability. After all, Hammel's slider checks in at 84.5 miles per hour, which means it's fully capable of leaving a mark."

You can get your frustration out of your system while also being able to deny you meant to hit him. Throwing a fastball is basically admitting you're trying to hurt the guy and asking for a suspension.

Okay, so your argument is that Hammel targeted his head with a slider?

If that's what you honestly believe, fine. I don't think anyone will agree with you because that is very atypical for numerous reasons.

1) How many people target with a slider?

2) What's more believable: Hammel's excellent command of his slider targeted the head or Hammel's erratic command caused the pitch to land near the head?

3) Hammel's prior history with regards to targeting

4) Orioles prior history with regards to targeting (with Buck in command)

Sorry, but your argument has way too many holes in it. To think he then warrants a suspension is totally off-base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No reason to call him a Idiot. Even if he is wrong he's at least trying to explain his thoughts on the matter

Fair enough. Sorries to AlbionHero. I'm still fired up.

He's still the opposite of correct. And should think about what he posts before he hits "send". Noise on this fine messageboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so your argument is that Hammel targeted his head with a slider?

If that's what you honestly believe, fine. I don't think anyone will agree with you because that is very atypical for numerous reasons.

1) How many people target with a slider?

2) What's more believable: Hammel's excellent command of his slider targeted the head or Hammel's erratic command caused the pitch to land near the head?

3) Hammel's prior history with regards to targeting

4) Orioles prior history with regards to targeting (with Buck in command)

Sorry, but your argument has way too many holes in it. To think he then warrants a suspension is totally off-base.

I understand the control issues. He wasn't anywhere near perfect today, and he threw quite a few pitches no where near where he meant to throw them. But like I said earlier... What do you realistically think the chances are that in a situation like this, he hits a guy near the head by mistake? Nobody ever responded to my post about it being around 0.3%... which, while an estimate, is probably about the chance someone hits a guy in the shoulder/head area with a pitch. Everyone is giving the benefit of the doubt and thinking that this very rare thing happened in this specific situation which means he's innocent.

Even considering his wildness, lets say its a 5% chance he hits a guy in that area given his command today. Thats still a 95% chance it was intentional. You talk about holes in my argument... how do you respond to there being very very little chance of actually hitting a guy in that situation by accident?

Its possible it was unintentional. But its also much more likely it wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's an awesome breakdown. Do you have a blog where I can read more of your insights?

Which Hammel is he. The one that saved the pitching staff last week. Or the one who wrecked it this week. Which Verlander was it. The one who pitched today or the one who gave up eight last week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade Hammel- this guy is a complete headcase joke- like all of our pitchers.

DO NOT resign Weiters. Guy can't call a game/hit for anything. Subtraction of these two = more wins.

PERIOD.

:rofl:

Thanks for the laugh! Too easy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade Hammel- this guy is a complete headcase joke- like all of our pitchers.

DO NOT resign Weiters. Guy can't call a game/hit for anything. Subtraction of these two = more wins.

PERIOD.

And just what do you think your going to get for a starter sporting a 5+ ERA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • You don’t downgrade Mayo because of the defense? Or do you think that the plus arm will allow him to play in RF?
    • I'd handicap it differently, even though Austin hit the ball more solidly the last week. After his 10-day stint on IL, I think there is perhaps a 85% chance he goes on rehab with the residual chance due to a gaping hole in the Orioles lineup/bench which has been exposed. Assuming he goes on some form of rehab assignment, there are at least 3 groups I'd offer as qualitatively different outcomes: 1. He goes on rehab for 5 days or less and either a hole/spot develops or he starts hitting right away 2. He goes on rehab for between 6 and 20 days (max rehab time for a position player) and the Orioles use much more, if not all of the shot clock before making a decision.  It could be a matter of Hays not hitting particularly well in the minors or the Orioles playing well with everyone healthy. 3. The club reaches the end of 20 days and uses the remaining option on Hays to leave him there because the O's don't have room given the set of quality OF/DH/1B they have and don't have an easy roster move to make.  The Orioles may be forced to trade him if this occurs, but I would not be shocked if he returns when an injury opens up a spot. Please let me know if you can think of any other possibilities that are not subsets of these 3 outcomes. If I am handicapping the 3 options, I'd say it's: Return to the big leagues immediately after 10 days: 15% Short rehab assignment (option 1): 50% Long rehab assignment (option 2): 25% Optioned after rehab (option 3): 10% Effectively, the Orioles will have already optioned Hays to the minors for a reset with option 2, but under the guise of the injury.   I'd like to hear from as many other posters as would care to handicap these 4 outcomes.  Simply post your percentages for each of the 4.     
    • I don’t know what Friedman or Stearns make. But I’m sure that will be the comp used by his agent. And whatever that number is I’m sure Rubenstein will work off of that to ensure that he stays running the Orioles for a long time.
    • That was fun to watch. Seems like some hitters whiff on fastballs up in the zone because they can't help themselves. Trout watches fastballs up in the zone because he knows he can't hit it. It's the perfect pitch to Trout, but the margin for error is razor-thin.
    • The 2 most overall talented players in the org are Holliday and Gunnar. Adley is the most important. You can argue that Basallo has the highest ceiling. Mayo is right there with them.     This is no shot at Cowser, HK or anyone else.  These guys are just that good.  
    • Kjerstad Norfolk splits (2023-2024) Vs lefties wOBA = .347 xwOBA = .336 K% = 21.5% BB% = 5.6% Whiff = 28.7% Hard hit = 41.0%   Vs righties  wOBA = .426 xwOBA = .377 K% = 20.5% BB% = 9.9% Whiff = 24.3% Hard hit = 47.2%
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...