Jump to content

8th Round Pick - Trey Mancini - 1B - Notre Dame (IN)


Recommended Posts

From his profile:

"AT NOTRE DAME: Two-year monogram winner enters his junior season with a .320 career batting average, 21 home runs and 79 RBI ..."

MONOGRAM winner? Get over yourself, Notre Dame. It's a damned letter.

That said, hope this kid (and all of the other Oriole draftees) works out.

They don't call them letters at Notre Dame because you don't earn a/one "Letter". You earn two letters (ND). Two letters used as a symbol is by definition a monogram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Steve Melewski ‏@masnSteve 24s

Orioles have come to terms with 3 draft picks: 1B Trey Mancini (round 8), C Austin Wynns (round 10) & OF Mike Yastrzemski (round 14).

Steve Melewski ‏@masnSteve 42s

Mancini and Wynns are headed to Aberdeen. The younger Yaz too but he won't be there until about a few days into the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have seen a lot of Mancini. Bat doesn't stay in the zone long, but big raw power. Bat speed adequate. Power really his only carrying tool -- needs to hit a bunch to have value. Stats inflated some by mid-week performance, but a solid college kid. Solid value for the round, for sure.

Why the lack of strikeouts? Was the wid-week and out of conference schedule that weak? I keep hear about miss in his bat but his stats don't show it. A solid 8th round pick either way though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Why the lack of strikeouts? Was the wid-week and out of conference schedule that weak? I keep hear about miss in his bat but his stats don't show it. A solid 8th round pick either way though.

Swing/bat speed wouldn't seem to translate to wood/advanced pitching. We shall see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has gotten off to a good pro start.

Not that I'd extrapolate much from 9 games, but striking out about 21% of the time, walking just 3% of the time, and an XBH once every three games or so. Obviously these are areas he'll need to improve as a bat-only prospect, but we won't even know if these are real issues until he's in full season ball next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that I'd extrapolate much from 9 games, but striking out about 21% of the time, walking just 3% of the time, and an XBH once every three games or so. Obviously these are areas he'll need to improve as a bat-only prospect, but we won't even know if these are real issues until he's in full season ball next year.

Sure. Thanks for the followup. I appreciate your insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Swing/bat speed wouldn't seem to translate to wood/advanced pitching. We shall see...

Thanks. He's an interesting case for statistical analysis for college players now that the bats have been toned down significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. He's an interesting case for statistical analysis for college players now that the bats have been toned down significantly.

Agreed. Teams trying to incorporate college stat analysis (from my understanding) are still a year or two from feeling more comfortable, since we only have three years of the new bats, and they want a deeper pool of stats to form baselines for comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Teams trying to incorporate college stat analysis (from my understanding) are still a year or two from feeling more comfortable, since we only have three years of the new bats, and they want a deeper pool of stats to form baselines for comparison.

Yep. K-BB ratio, K/PA and BB/PA are fairly decent indicators for me with negative stats in these categories as huge red flags. With the new bats, the power numbers have significantly dropped and that is giving us a better idea of true power potential rather than the trumped up stats in year's past. Still, as you are well aware, there are many indicators that have to be taken into consideration.

I never saw Mancini obviously and could only go by the video I saw and his statistics, but the stats belied the fact that some reports said he had a lot of miss. This is what makes him an interesting case to study through his professional career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this guy will be our right handed Adam Dunn.

Talk about unreasonable expectations. Mancini doesn't have Dunn's frame, first of all. Second of all, Adam Dunn is an incredibly unusual player and to even throw his name around with an 8th round pick based on nothing more than that that pick hits for some power makes no sense.

Mancini is a fine player, but he's not "right handed Adam Dunn" and we shouldn't even think that's a possibility for him right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about unreasonable expectations. Mancini doesn't have Dunn's frame, first of all. Second of all, Adam Dunn is an incredibly unusual player and to even throw his name around with an 8th round pick based on nothing more than that that pick hits for some power makes no sense.

Mancini is a fine player, but he's not "right handed Adam Dunn" and we shouldn't even think that's a possibility for him right now.

Plus Dunn is a pretty awful player. Worse than replacement level past 3 years. Strikes out a ton, hits to a low average and can't field a lick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Saw Mancini tonight, hes a physical specimen. Had a deep sac fly, and another deep fly ball out to center field. He wasn't playing 1B, he was DH'ing I think. I couldn't find him on the field at least. Got fooled on some breaking pitches in all the AB's I saw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • That is good news, as we have plenty of offensive potential to trade for pitching!
    • If that number is the barometer then the answer is yes. Absolutely yes!  If the goal is to one build a longer term multiple World Series winning team, then you don’t let elite/irreplaceable talent walk. Look around the game, nobody is really doing that anymore. At least not without retaining at least one franchise player to market/build around. If the other goal is to grow the franchise’s viability/relevance/fanbase/revenues within this market, you have to have superstar m/face of the franchise players that people want to see and corporations want to invest as dollars in.
    • Baseball America 10. Moises Chace, RHP, Orioles Chace’s stuff across the board is getting more swing-and-miss than it did a year ago. A 20-year-old righthander with High-A Abderdeen, Chace is throwing slightly harder than he did in 2023, sitting at 93-95 mph and reaching 96 mph with a riding fastball. He’s getting a high amount of whiffs both with a changeup that has good fade and separation off his fastball as well as a high-spin slider (2,700-2,900 rpm) that has sharp sweep across the zone. It’s a starter’s repertoire, though after recording a 15-to-2 strikeout-to-walk ratio in his first two starts, Chace walked six in four innings in his last outing. Control has been an issue for Chace before—he walked 53 in 68 innings last year—so while he has the stuff to start, location will be key for him to stick in that role.
    • Baseball America  4. Michael Forret, RHP, Orioles Forret was a 14th-round pick from State JC of Florida last year who signed with the Orioles for $450,000. He pitched in the low 90s, touched 94 mph and showed the strength projection in his 6-foot-3, 190-pound frame to think there could be more in the tank. The 20-year-old righthander has added a few ticks to his fastball already this year in Low-A Delmarva, sitting 93-95 mph and touching 97. His plus slider has been a major weapon in the low-to-mid 80s, giving him a sharp breaking ball that snaps off with late bite to miss bats. Overall, Forret has a 3.46 ERA with 19 strikeouts and three walks in 13 innings, making him one of the more intriguing sleeper prospects in the lower levels.
    • What's the run scored per game average in MLB now compared to this point last year?
    • I picked Adley simply because he was here first, he seems like the most realistic shot at an extension, and he’s the heart and soul of the team. Gunnar is the more elite talent, for sure, but are they going to top BWJ’s deal? Of course there is no real frame of reference for how the new ownership group will spend, but I’d be floored if they topped 11/288. Burnes has made it pretty clear that he wants to hit FA and it ultimately feels like he’ll end up back on the west coast. 
    • I don’t know how you are assessing value? Is it to express who is being paid the least for the most productivity? Is it age vs production? Is it who is the best player right now? 5 tool talent? Something else?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...