Jump to content

Toronto Series - Immature Humor


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I hope our pitching staff can throw their balls in there hard and hit the spot, then they won't get yanked prematurely. Staff should get great satisfaction with their performance. No need to be embarrassed by having somebody perform the job that they weren't capable of handling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not looking past the game today, but looking at the schedule, I found it funny that we're facing Dickey, Wang, and Johnson. What is up with this Toronto staff?! :laughlol:

I'll be surprised if you don't earn another green pip by starting this thread. :D

What a great thread for hump day...wup, wup...hump day...oh yeah (absolutely love that Geigo commerical). :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Well, he can talk to Mandrews for some tips.
    • I just logged in and was thinking about Miller as a starter for next season, and whether he would make as much sense as Skubal does... and here you've starting a thread about the same thing.  LOL It's hard to say what it would take to get Miller, but having him an additional five seasons would be incredible.  I'd think the packages would be somewhat similar in value, but that's just a guess.
    • That’s actually really exciting cherry on top for this draft. I believe you can give 125K before it counts towards your pool.
    • Point taken, maybe on value w/r/t the draft. But Johnson isn’t in the same stratosphere as Holiday with what he has done so far in pro ball.
    • Most interesting player behind Honeycutt to me. The first 5 picks will be very interesting to see how much they are able to save. 
    • Just some observations and reflections on this year's draft and the strategy in general... In one thread I defended the emphasis on position players in high rounds, disparaging pitchers as "cannon fodder." Seeing all the pitchers taken in the lower rounds amplifies this take. To expand the analogy to a military "draft," to me this year's draft class especially looks like staffing the officers corps from the best recruits, the higher rounds. Then fill out the ranks of cannon fodder (perishable pitchers) in quantity from the lower rounds.  A post by Frobby in a thread on closers amplifies this point. How many top closers are effective for more than a few years? Same with top starting pitchers. Contrast the longer careers at the top of their game for position players. At the other end of the scale, look how many bullpens are revolving doors of low draft picks, waiver claims, reclamation projects. Sorry for not substantiating all this with researched stats: it's an impression, over many years.  Zoom in to what it's like to throw an unproven reliever out there. He might be lights out, for a few innings, a few outings or a season or two. Great! Rinse and repeat. Hello, Albert Suarez. Goodbye, Fuji. A hitter (and fielder) needs many more repetitions to get a good read on their ability (see: Jim Traber, Jackson Holliday).  So to me this year's draft is an optimum strategy overall (even tho they claim every pick is BPA). Take your few surer things first, the position guys to rely on. Then have lots of "maybe" arms in reserve, because you'll need them, to burn quantity and see what wants to stick when the time comes.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...