Jump to content

Weaver Ejected, I mean Buck Ejected


BillySmith

Recommended Posts

I agree with most of what you are saying, but disagree with the bolded. He did call foul and kilkled the play. The ball is dead by rule -- that part of it is not judgment. Right or wrong on the judgment call, the ball is dead once called foul. That can be protested, since the crew unbelievable allowed a dead ball to become live. All four umps should be seriously reprimanded. I can't believe that not one of them said to the others during their conference, "Guys, it doesn't matter if Angel got the call wrong. The play is dead once he called it foul. We need to move on."

Unfortunately fair/foul (or in this case, foul/swing through) falls under what they consider an umpires judgment call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Unfortunately fair/foul (or in this case, foul/swing through) falls under what they consider an umpires judgment call.

But the stoppage of a play is not a judgement. Once it is stopped, it's stopped. Angel was wrong, his judgement was wrong. And they know that Buck caught them and is trying to take them down. Angel is on double secret probation anyway. For your theory to be right, a random fan has to be selected to throw the ball away from Arencibia while Davis races down the first base line, to "recreate" the stopped action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the stoppage of a play is not a judgement. Angel was wrong, his judgement was wrong. And they know that Buck caught them and is trying to take them down. Angel is on double secret probation anyway.

That, I agree with. But I guess what I was saying is that it becomes murky enough at that point that a protest would just have been thrown out out of convenience, I think.

There does need to be a culling of the ranks. I shudder to think how many good umps working Triple A crews are stuck because some of these turds have some seriously undeserved job security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That, I agree with. But I guess what I was saying is that it becomes murky enough at that point that a protest would just have been thrown out out of convenience, I think.

There does need to be a culling of the ranks. I shudder to think how many good umps working Triple A crews are stuck because some of these turds have some seriously undeserved job security.

They shouldn't have taken any of them back after the mass resignation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck caught them in a big screwup, but they're not man enough to take it and fix it. Like a lot judges I know: show them wrong, they'll get you next time.

Yeah, I can't imagine that particular crew of umps not eventually screwing Buck over for ejecting *them* from the game. No way they weren't going to "teach him a lesson" about that, unfortunately. I still can't get over the Bautista home run derby at-bat, after calling Machado out on an obvious ball. Manny's long-held facial expression was priceless (even that had a seasoned veteran's look to it!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I can't imagine that particular crew of umps not eventually screwing Buck over for ejecting *them* from the game. No way they weren't going to "teach him a lesson" about that, unfortunately. I still can't get over the Bautista home run derby at-bat, after calling Machado out on an obvious ball. Manny's long-held facial expression was priceless (even that had a seasoned veteran's look to it!).

The whole crew is going to be punished again. And they know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately fair/foul (or in this case, foul/swing through) falls under what they consider an umpires judgment call.

Yes, his original call is a judgment call, but the rule that once a ball is called foul and is made dead is not a judgment call -- it is an absolute. The Orioles' beef is not with the judgment call -- it is with the obvious incorrect reversal which made a dead ball live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I think you're basically right, probability-wise.  That said, almost no one thought Kjerstad coming up today was the move they were going to make. So... you never really know with Mike and roster moves. But I agree, it's tough to figure out how he stays if Mounty is healthy when Hays comes back. 
    • But he's 82nd percentile in barrel percentage and 92nd percentile in Whiff. I saw some some high EVs that were hit at 60 degree angles or more which were pop ups. I'm not saying he's a long term piece. I'd need to see it for longer than two starts, but I like the stuff overall, especially if he can get his curveball over more often to give another look to the change and cutter.
    • The rookie is a #2 overall selection, now 25 years old, who battled back from missing significant time with non-baseball related illness, was called up last season but had mostly sit behind a mediocre performing veteran (Hays), and is performing better at the minor league levels than Hays ever did. But, I guess he hasn’t paid his dues and is just temporarily holding a spot for the guy who was fortunate enough to come up when he was much younger and the organization was in bad shape.
    • Simmer down...  Just because you've got it all figured out doesn't mean I do.
    • by all means bet the house and the student loans
    • Jumping on to make sure everyone here knows about the Orioles history project I've started this season. It's called the Bird Tapes . When I wrote my oral history book about the team a quarter-century ago, I interviewed all the major figures in franchise history and kept the microcassette tapes that I used while recording those interviews. They sat in a shoebox in my closet for years but now I've had them digitized and I'm going to be rolling them out in weekly posts along with some new writing that connects the Orioles' past to the present. The Bird Tapes is housed on the Substack media platform. The web address is birdtapes.substack.com. It's a subscription-based model and subscribers gain access to the vintage interviews for a small monthly fee. So far I have posted my quarter-century-old interviews with Brooks Robinson, Earl Weaver and Ernie Harwell, the legendary broadcaster who was the Orioles' first play-by-play man. Next up: Paul Blair. I've written articles about Mark Belanger and Brooks, and much, much more is coming. The response to the rollout of the Bird Tapes has been great so far. Please subscribe if interested at birdtapes.substack.com.  
    • We drafted him for his elite speed and defense. If the bat plays - he could be a star. If not, he could still be a useful piece. You don't see the same projections from Cowser, Westburg or Kjerstad because those were bat-first players. There's a reason we're having trouble finding space for guys like Kjerstad and Norby.  Also you're going to say it might be his first draft flop after 13 games at A+? Wild. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...