Jump to content

Matt Wieters WAR Is Officially 0.0


AJismyhero

Recommended Posts

260-280 feet to the corner, with a starting velocity of about 130 MPH (which is about as hard as you can hit a baseball)

The ball would hit the RF wall in about 2.2 seconds (assuming the ball travels about 320 feet - ball travels on a curved path). 0.5 seconds to field the ball and chuck it to the 1B. 1.8 seconds for the ball to travel from the RF to 1B. That's 4.5 seconds. A slow runner can easily take this long.

The Lombardi story was hit to left field. And he stood at the plate watching his not-quite-a-homer until it was obvious it wasn't. So the question is could the fielding of the ball, and relay from LF to first take a shorter amount of time than a guy slower than Matt Wieters takes to run to first? I think it could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I don't know how much time Wieters spends studying opposing pitchers, compared to other players on the team. Do you? I agree that Wieters has other things to study that, IMO, are more important in the scheme of things. l already said that. So why the snarky response?
I don't appreciate people putting words in my mouth. You said, "I don't think we really know that Wieters doesn't spend time studying the opposing pitchers." Please show me in my post where I said anything like that. Simple theory. He probably concentrates more on catching prep than hitting prep. You think that's a wild and crazy supposition?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lombardi story was hit to left field. And he stood at the plate watching his not-quite-a-homer until it was obvious it wasn't. So the question is could the fielding of the ball, and relay from LF to first take a shorter amount of time than a guy slower than Matt Wieters takes to run to first? I think it could.

Ok lets redo the numbers: 280 feet to the corner, flyball, so hangtime is probably around 4 seconds. However, he was lollygagging for 2.5-3 of those seconds. So it bounces off the wall, LFer fields and throws to 1B in about 2.4 seconds. So assuming a clean pick, you still come up with the same numbers - around 4.5 seconds from the time he starts running till the ball reaches 1B, which is basically Matt Wieters speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't appreciate people putting words in my mouth. You said, "I don't think we really know that Wieters doesn't spend time studying the opposing pitchers." Please show me in my post where I said anything like that. Simple theory. He probably concentrates more on catching prep than hitting prep. You think that's a wild and crazy supposition?

Jeez, I write a post that is 90% in support of your position and you complain about how I worded the other 10%. Carry on, I have better things to do than discuss this further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...