Jump to content

Team believes that Wieters will forego long-term deal


jabba72

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm not really sure how much I care. His bat just doesn't seem like it's ever going to play outside of catcher, his body is large, so how long will he be a good defensive catcher... that bat just isn't developing for some reason.

But I think it could be one of those things where he leaves and even .250 with 20 home runs seems like a luxury we wish we had back again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say I really understand that, but I guess I don't think like Scott Boras. I'd be looking to get myself locked up for 5 or 6 years at a decent deal while my defense is still top notch and there's still hope for my offense. A 30 year old .250 hitter with modest power and slower than molasses who might wind up at 1B/DH within a couple years isn't exactly going to command the kind of 7 to 10 year deal Boras dreams about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say I really understand that, but I guess I don't think like Scott Boras. I'd be looking to get myself locked up for 5 or 6 years at a decent deal while my defense is still top notch and there's still hope for my offense. A 30 year old .250 hitter with modest power and slower than molasses who might wind up at 1B/DH within a couple years isn't exactly going to command the kind of 7 to 10 year deal Boras dreams about.

It could be as simple as the money not being right.

My guess is that the plan isn't for Wieters to hit the FA market at 31-32 years old which is what an extension with the O's is going to cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We still have two more years, which will likely be the middle of his peak. Im also fine letting someone else have the back end, while they pay for the production we received.

Shame though something reasonable cant be ironed out to make him a life long Oriole. But we shall see. I dont hold any weight to any reporters' comments anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may have had to let Wieters go anyway with what Davis will command and Machado (who they will lock-up early if they're smart). They may have to make a splash for a FA starting pitcher as well at some point. Can't pay everybody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieters value is as low as it is going to be right now, it is no surprise he doesn't want to sign a long term deal when his offense is at a career low point.

You think the deal offered now won't be there in 2 years regardless of what he does with the bat in between now and then? Of course it will, so what exactly is the point of signing now when you can hope the offense improves over the next 2 years?

The offense stays the same....he still gets more money in 2 years that he gets now. His offense improves, he might DOUBLE the money he is being offered now. It is a win/win situation for him any way you look at it by playing it out.

If he wasn't in a huge offensive slump it might be a different story, the timing just isn't right for anything to happen right now.

And that might not be a bad thing for the Orioles if this is what he is offensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wieters value is as low as it is going to be right now, it is no surprise he doesn't want to sign a long term deal when his offense is at a career low point.

That whole post...100%. There's zero incentive for Wieters to sign long term. He's at the absolute low of his value right now. The contract he'd get now, he'll get then, barring injury. For Matt, it just makes sense to wait and see if he can up his offensive game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Orioles drafted four catchers in the first ten rounds this year for a reason. Hoping to have a replacement for Wieters when he leaves in in two years.

I think we are wise to only offer him a six years. Wieters wont age gracefully.

I would bet we draft catcher pretty heavy next year also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...