Jump to content

How do the O's push a starter with a 2.74 ERA over his last four starts out of the rotation?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

DD doesn't trade of TOR starters. He develops them. Tillman, Gausman....... That is why I say don't think you know what the O's will be in 3 months. There could be as much improvement in those guys as there has been in Davis and Manny.

So Pedro Martinez was developed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
DD doesn't trade of TOR starters. He develops them. Tillman, Gausman....... That is why I say don't think you know what the O's will be in 3 months. There could be as much improvement in those guys as there has been in Davis and Manny.
Tillman is not a TOR nor will he become one. Gausman might, but not this year or next, IMO. That leaves Bundy, who won't be even a consideration for the rotation until 2015. For me a TOR SP is 200 IP, 200 K's and a 3.00 ERA or better. We will not develop one of those in the next 5 years.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tillman is not a TOR nor will he become one. Gausman might, but not this year or next, IMO. That leaves Bundy, who won't be even a consideration for the rotation until 2015. For me a TOR SP is 200 IP, 200 K's and a 3.00 ERA or better. We will not develop one of those in the next 5 years.

How could you have any idea about that? A true ace could be drafted next year and in the majors by later that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tillman is not a TOR nor will he become one. Gausman might, but not this year or next, IMO. That leaves Bundy, who won't be even a consideration for the rotation until 2015. For me a TOR SP is 200 IP, 200 K's and a 3.00 ERA or better. We will not develop one of those in the next 5 years.

Tillman is on pace for being darn close to all 3 things you mentioned. Given his age and this being his first full season of breaking camp with the team, who's to say he doesn't become an ace? Other than your opinion, that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we need that additional (non-Strop) right-handed arm in the pen, whether it be Gausman or Hammel. I, personally, would rather see Britton sent down to Norfolk to continue starting and be ready to step right in when the next, inevitable, injury happens to one of our other starters, instead of being sent to pitch out of the bullpen.

I just have the feeling that Gausman could be a bigger help to the club, this year, working out of the pen then Britton would be. At the same time, I feel that Britton will be a bigger help to the club, this year, working as a starter.

If the O's made the surprising decision (surprising in my estimation anyway) to keep Britton in the rotation, move Hammel to the bullpen and Gausman to AAA as rotational depth, I guess I'd be okay with that. But again, I'd just probably feel more comfortable keeping Hammel in the rotation for now, Gausman in the pen, and Britton at the ready in Norfolk.

Hopefully, DD can pull off a trade for an additional right-handed relief arm and we can put Gausman back down at Norfolk and starting regularly so that he too can be ready as a starter, or reliever, if needed.

You know, I can totally envision Gausman being a potential shut-down reliever in this post-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Saunders has made 17 starts this year. In 7 of those 17 starts he has allowed 4 runs or more. In 9 of those starts he has allowed 3 ER or less. As a matter of fact, in 6 starts he has allowed 1 earned run, in 2 starts he has allowed 0 earned runs. Could he have made us better? Maybe ever so slightly, because Freddy Garcia made 11 starts for us, and in those 11 starts he allowed 2 earned runs or fewer in 6 of 11 starts. He got absolutely shelled in 4 of 11. And that 1 remaining starts was so-so (4 earned runs in 6 innings).

Long story short, Freddy Garcia was our Joe Saunders type. He was a fall back plan, and basically this club banking on Arrieta, Britton, Jurrjens, etc. to do well bit them in the butt when Chen got hurt. Either way, with Chen coming back, Britton pitching better, and Duquette making the necessary moves to help the bullpen (Strop gone) and the rotation (Feldman)...our rotation will get much better. Saunders is a fringey kind of player for the O's. Keep in mind he's pitching in a very pitcher friendly park. His home/away splits are ridiculous:

Home: 4.37 ERA, 244/283/489 - 771 OPS (that OPS really isn't that good, but anyways...)

AWay: 8.50 ERA, 359/400/654 - 1.054 OPS

Problem with the away is that he's only started 4 games away. And if you by his last 28 days, he's pitched to an 8.59 ERA. That's abysmal. Do you really want that on this club? I don't. This isn't last year...as evidenced by Hammel's poor numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tillman is not a TOR nor will he become one. Gausman might, but not this year or next, IMO. That leaves Bundy, who won't be even a consideration for the rotation until 2015. For me a TOR SP is 200 IP, 200 K's and a 3.00 ERA or better. We will not develop one of those in the next 5 years.

Why so certain? Tillman certainly has TOR stuff and he's right at the TOR's front door. If Tillman throws less pitches and reduce the hr's, he's arrived. The hr's seems to be a strange quirk considering the low era, so that should go down naturally. But we agree on the IP needs to improve, and it should. It's not like Tillman has been a major league starter for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why so certain? Tillman certainly has TOR stuff and he's right at the TOR's front door. If Tillman throws less pitches and reduce the hr's, he's arrived. The hr's seems to be a strange quirk considering the low era, so that should go down naturally. But we agree on the IP needs to improve, and it should. It's not like Tillman has been a major league starter for a long time.

Tillman is a fly ball guy. He will give up some home runs, the key is to make sure they are solo shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to the second half last year, Tillman is 19-5 with a low 3's ERA. Those are pretty credible TOR numbers. He has some issues but it is certainly conceivable that he can be an elite starter.
Not by my criteria. 200 IP, 200 K's 3.00 ERA or under. That's not Tillman. Don't kid yourself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • This is probably as close to clicking on all cylinders as most teams get.  In any given 24-game period, some guys will be up and others down.  We have 9 players with an OPS+ of 116 or higher.  The four guys you mentioned will have hotter periods, and someone else will be cold then.  That’s baseball.  But the ratio of hot players to cold ones is really good right now. 
    • I don’t see it.  Project guy.  Good upside but can’t see that in the first round. I think they go corner with the first pick unless someone unexpectedly drops. The assumption has been Oline but I think the draft is so deep and so many teams will be taking tackles that the Ravens will elect to wait until later in the draft to get Oline and WR help. Its not a deep corner draft, so getting one early makes sense. If they trade up, I wouldn’t think they trade anything higher than a 4th..could move up 3-6 spots. Trade back will likely get them a pick for next year.
    • Gunnar is our Kyle Tucker but at a more premium position.  
    • I said Gunnar earlier. Before this season, I could have seen a case for Adley.  And I love Adley, great hitter (I don't think he's ever going to be a big power guy, but plate approach, contact, key hits, he's great) leader, heart and soul, etc.   But it's clearly Gunnar.  I didn't expect him to be this good, this fast.  He's separating himself from the rest of the pack, not only on this team but throughout the league. Whether or not an extension can happen is a different story altogether.  But Gunnar's the guy I'd go with first.
    • It is early, but the O's have some clear holes that will prevent a World Series run this season. And it looks like there are some teams playing there way out of contention already, barring a massive improvement in performance, making them likely sellers. At a quick glance, here are the teams that already could be looking to sell at the deadline. Some teams on the list made some offseason moves that signaled they are looking to compete. But early returns aren't looking good, and now they have an old team with pieces someone may find helpful, and without much talent in the pipeline. Tier 1 Losers Rockies White Sox Marlins Tier 2  - Not Looking Good Oakland Giants Angels Astros Cardinals Nationals I haven't really taken much look at the rosters to see what pieces could help us. So, who is selling? And Which of their pitchers have a chance to be on the market?  
    • I still feel like our offense isn't clicking on all cylinders yet. Santander has been down, Adley hasn't found alot of extra base power, Holliday has been a black hole so far, Hays was bad and now injured, Urias hasn't hit well.
    • It should be noted that it was the 8-9 hitters up at the time of that call.  So while it was the wrong call, its not like the Angels definitely tie it if he's called safe.  There is a very good chance Rengifo makes an out a pitch or two later anyway. So yes, bad call, but we didn't steal the game away because of that one call.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...