Jump to content

Lottery 2014


Recommended Posts

It's a good thing that eligibility for the lottery is based on market size (which teams can't control) rather than revenue (which teams can control to some extent). Ideally you want to compensate teams that are in smaller markets while preserving incentives for teams to field strong teams and to market themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply
No they don't.

If they did Oakland would have a pick.

How can you say that Oakland would have a pick? Do you understand what a lottery is?

According to the article in the Sun, there are two groups of ten teams. One group is based on revenue and the other on market size. There is a lottery for each group and the six lottery winners get an extra pick after the first round. The lottery losers get an extra pick after the second round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good thing that eligibility for the lottery is based on market size (which teams can't control) rather than revenue (which teams can control to some extent). Ideally you want to compensate teams that are in smaller markets while preserving incentives for teams to field strong teams and to market themselves.

Lottery eligibility is based on the 10 smallest markets AND the 10 lowest revenues. There are a few overlaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you say that Oakland would have a pick? Do you understand what a lottery is?

According to the article in the Sun, there are two groups of ten teams. One group is based on revenue and the other on market size. There is a lottery for each group and the six lottery winners get an extra pick after the first round. The lottery losers get an extra pick after the second round.

http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2013/7/18/4535092/2014-mlb-draft-competitive-balance-lottery-rockies-orioles-indians

The lottery is comprised of the 10 lowest-revenue and the 10 smallest-market teams in the league. Because there is some crossover between these two groups, there were only 14 teams eligible for the lottery this year. The odds of a team getting the top pick in the lottery is determined by its winning percentage in the season prior. Since the Rockies had the lowest winning percentage among the eligible teams, they had the best shot of getting the top pick.

Now that the picks have been awarded, teams are allowed to to trade them at their heart's content, which could potentially give playoff contenders like the Orioles, D-Backs, Indians, etc. a leg up in trade talks as we near the July 31 deadline. Two picks were dealt last year following the inaugural lottery.

The only eligible teams to not receive competitive-balance picks this year were the Oakland Athletics and the Cincinnati Reds.

14 teams. 12 slots. The A's and Reds didn't get slots. They had the first and second highest winning %. Third was Orioles, which we are lucky to get the 2nd pick. Colorado had the lowest winning % among the eligible teams which is why they ended up with the number one pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2013/7/18/4535092/2014-mlb-draft-competitive-balance-lottery-rockies-orioles-indians

14 teams. 12 slots. The A's and Reds didn't get slots. They had the first and second highest winning %. Third was Orioles, which we are lucky to get the 2nd pick. Colorado had the lowest winning % among the eligible teams which is why they ended up with the number one pick.

Absolutely. It is a lottery. If more teams had not overlapped the two categories, more teams would have been shut out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Angels screwed the pooch when he allowed the Expos to move to DC. Of all the terrible things he's done in his tenure as a MLB owner that was by far the thing that will have the lasting negative impact on the team long after he's gone.

I am not sure that this is true. I may well me wrong but I thought MLB decided to put a team in DC. And while I am usually harsh on Angelo's, I believe most thought he negotiated about as well as he could. Now, if you want to talk about the Orioles seeing any of the MASN money, I'm right there with you. At least that's how I recall it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...