Jump to content

Orioles Want Pie Added


hardrock75

Recommended Posts

Here's a blog from the CST from a few days ago that describes the deal of Gallagher, Marshall and Cedeno for Roberts as a steal for the Cubbies.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/fullcourtpress/2008/01/chicago_baseball_rumor_mill.html

So clearly there are perspectives from even the Cubs camp that acknowledge this is not a good deal for the O's.

It is a steal for the Cubs because Marshall stinks, Cedeno is not in their plans, and although Gallagher might be one of the Cubs top five prospects, their system is not that deep with Major League ready teams.

The O's are rebuilding, but if this is the best they can do, they should retain Roberts and let the market improve for him. A team needing a spark or with a hole at 2B in the spring or even June/July will put a better deal on the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 162
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It is a steal for the Cubs because Marshall stinks, Cedeno is not in their plans, and although Gallagher might be one of the Cubs top five prospects, their system is not that deep with Major League ready teams.

The O's are rebuilding, but if this is the best they can do, they should retain Roberts and let the market improve for him. A team needing a spark or with a hole at 2B in the spring or even June/July will put a better deal on the table.

I agree, but it then becomes imperative that we trade Bedard. Not dealing at least one of them for top prospects would set our rebuilding plan back years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should deal then both!

I dont like Pie.

I would give them a choice if I were AM

Gallagher, Colvin, Marshall & Cedeno

or

Gallagher, Colvin, Murton

I like this deal the best. To me, the best player we are getting from the Cubs is Gallagher. We need the starting pitching depth.

Colvin will be nice if we can use him as a sweetener if we are trying to land Jones AND Clement plus others from Seattle. Maybe a deal of Bedard/Colvin could get us back a Jones, Clement, Tillman, and Chen type deal. I don't know why, but I don't see Seattle trading Triunfel at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys,I'm a Cubs fan and I would rather not have Pie in any deals with any teams,Colvin on the other hand,I'd be all for trading in a heartbeat.

I'd also be for adding Fuld in a deal for Roberts.

I don't think the cubs should give up on Tyler Colvin this quickly...Colvin has had one season in the sysytem where he faired OK, but take a look at what he did in his senior year in college, posting a .359 BA, give him some time. Pie on the other hand, i am through saying "1 more year"...his offense is SLOWLY developing and he lacks pllate discipline, while i understand Colvin does too, i think Tyler has more upside than Pie...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys,I'm a Cubs fan and I would rather not have Pie in any deals with any teams,Colvin on the other hand,I'd be all for trading in a heartbeat.

I'd also be for adding Fuld in a deal for Roberts.

I would be looking to move Colvin if I were the Cubs...he is going to be a bust IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the cubs should give up on Tyler Colvin this quickly...Colvin has had one season in the sysytem where he faired OK, but take a look at what he did in his senior year in college, posting a .359 BA, give him some time. Pie on the other hand, i am through saying "1 more year"...his offense is SLOWLY developing and he lacks pllate discipline, while i understand Colvin does too, i think Tyler has more upside than Pie...

You're being quite a hypocrit on these two

Same age, Pie is better offensively, better defensively, and has better plate discipline than Colvin

You may think Colvin attains his upside and you may think Pie doesn't, but Colvin does not have more upside than Pie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're being quite a hypocrit on these two

Same age, Pie is better offensively, better defensively, and has better plate discipline than Colvin

You may think Colvin attains his upside and you may think Pie doesn't, but Colvin does not have more upside than Pie

it's just an opinion, no need to jump on me...and how am i being a hypocrite?I think ive been on the side of Tyler Colvin the whole time this matter has been up in the air?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's just an opinion, no need to jump on me...and how am i being a hypocrite?I think ive been on the side of Tyler Colvin the whole time this matter has been up in the air?

Saying Pie lacks plate discipline as a negative thing-when his is better than Colvin

Pie's shown more power (SLG-wise, not HR) as Colvin

Pie is superior defensively

There is really nothing outside of a bias that says Colvin will be better, and nothing that says he has more upside...it could be your opinion, but I could say Sam Fuld has more upside than both-that doesn't mean it's true

Opinion's aren't immunity to being told you're wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saying Pie lacks plate discipline as a negative thing-when his is better than Colvin

Pie's shown more power (SLG-wise, not HR) as Colvin

Pie is superior defensively

There is really nothing outside of a bias that says Colvin will be better, and nothing that says he has more upside...it could be your opinion, but I could say Sam Fuld has more upside than both-that doesn't mean it's true

Opinion's aren't immunity to being told you're wrong

Im not looking for it to be animmunity to myself being wrong, im saying that no one here at OH actually knows who is going to turn out the better player, im stating my opinion in the fact that i like Colvin more, big deal. And the fact that Pie is superior defensively is understood, i have never once brought defense into the discussion, i understand this. But still Colvin has 1 season that you are judging him on. He has had about 190 games to adjust to the pitching. By this year he should have made the correct adjustments. in Colvin's almost 200 game minor league career he has slugged .486, while Pie's

minor league career SLG is .469. And their are other facts besides bias that show Colvin will catch up with and pass Pie offensively. His average increased every year in college while he got accustomed to the game...in '06

Colvin had an OPS of 1.028 in 69 games, a full college season, all im saying is if you give Colvin time to develop, he will become a solid player.

Heres the links:

Pie: http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=11427

Colvin: http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/C/tyler-colvin.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not looking for it to be animmunity to myself being wrong, im saying that no one here at OH actually knows who is going to turn out the better player, im stating my opinion in the fact that i like Colvin more, big deal. And the fact that Pie is superior defensively is understood, i have never once brought defense into the discussion, i understand this. But still Colvin has 1 season that you are judging him on. He has had about 190 games to adjust to the pitching. By this year he should have made the correct adjustments. in Colvin's almost 200 game minor league career he has slugged .486, while Pie's

minor league career SLG is .469. And their are other facts besides bias that show Colvin will catch up with and pass Pie offensively. His average increased every year in college while he got accustomed to the game...in '06

Colvin had an OPS of 1.028 in 69 games, a full college season, all im saying is if you give Colvin time to develop, he will become a solid player.

Heres the links:

Pie: http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=11427

Colvin: http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/C/tyler-colvin.shtml

You're comparing Pie's .469 SLG% from when he was 17-22 combined to Colvin's SLG at only ages 21-22

Compare their ages similarly

And while Colvin was putting up a 1.028 OPS in college ball, Pie was putting up a .903 OPS in AA-which is more impressive

I've said before, I'm willing to give Colvin a year, but he has to severely develop some patience or he needs to be ditched before everyone else realizes just how overrated he is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're comparing Pie's .469 SLG% from when he was 17-22 combined to Colvin's SLG at only ages 21-22

Compare their ages similarly

And while Colvin was putting up a 1.028 OPS in college ball, Pie was putting up a .903 OPS in AA-which is more impressive

I've said before, I'm willing to give Colvin a year, but he has to severely develop some patience or he needs to be ditched before everyone else realizes just how overrated he is

Ok, i say we agree to disagree because i don think that either of us are willing to budge!:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...