Jump to content

Buck just told us what he thinks of Jim Johnson


eddie83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So Eddie, I didn't here Buck but it looks like you and Frobby have two totally different takes on what he actually said. Did you get it wrong? Make it up? Or has Frobby completely lost it?
Maybe I have lost it:) It has a been a tough 10 days of baseball. I certainly didn't make it up.

I did hear what Frobby said later in the presser.

Your account is more or less correct. The stuff I quoted was at the end of the interview in response to a direct question about whether Buck had thought about using JJ to start the 9th. Earlier on he praised MacFarland for saving the rest of the bullpen by pitching multiple innings and said, "Jimmy was the only [other] guy who had the rest. He almost needed to pitch tonight."

But I don't see those statements as contradictory. They're consistent.

I would have relieved MacFarland after he gave up the second straight hit of the inning. You could tell they were catching up to him. I posted in the game thread that I thought Mac should be pulled, right before he allowed the double.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should be ashamed of yourself for this post. JJ has had a poor year but that happens in sports and is nothing to be ashamed of when you are giving your best effort. Besides that, I guarantee you that nobody on this team thinks Jim Johnson is the sole reason they are where they are.

Thank you again for being the voice of reason.

Signed,

Long suffering O's fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On needing to score more than one run in the seventh after loading the bases with no outs:

"We'd like to. Got back within one run there. Mac (T.J. McFarland) was great there. It got away from him a little bit in the last inning, but we were short down in the 'pen and he gave us some much-needed innings. Puts us in a better position to get some of our guys back physically. Jimmy (Johnson) was the only guy who really had the rest. He kind of almost needed to pitch tonight. The rest of them were a little short. Two or three guys there I was trying to stay away from unless we were at a winning cause."

source - Roch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm missing something. Were Hunter and O'Day fried, and totally unavailable. When was the last time they pitched?

I think he wanted to stay away from them. I do believe that to be the case. Definitely with Hunter. O'Day pitched last Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he wanted to stay away from them. I do believe that to be the case. Definitely with Hunter. O'Day pitched last Sunday.
When do relievers need more than a day's rest. In many cases they pitch 2-3 days in a row. We needed his game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When do relievers need more than a day's rest. In many cases they pitch 2-3 days in a row. We needed his game.

Look I wanted JJ there. I didn't get it at all. He had him up and yet he pulled the trigger after the damage was done. He was either going to bring him in with runners on or with runners on and runs already in. O'Day has pitched 6 times since the 10th, I can see wanting to give him 2 days off in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't it last week when someone was telling me that JJ has been pitching like he did last year?

FACT!

I think you can make that argument depending on how you look at it. His xFIP is only 0.20 higher this year. His BABIP is WAY up, like 70 points. But that is being driven by a higher LD% of over 20 vs. last year's slightly over 16.

The short of it, while the improved K rate and unimproved BB rate and HR rate are basically cancelled out, he is being hit harder in general. That is what the numbers are saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Hard to say hiw Manny would have been as a SS if he’d played it right from the start in the majors.  Due to Hardy’s presence, he essentially played 3B for 5.3 seasons before ever getting a shot as full time SS.   By that time he’d lost some speed and range and was rusty at the ins and outs of SS. If 2012-14 Hardy was on this team, Gunnar would be at 3B, watching Hardy win his three Gold Gloves.  
    • The Orioles are not going to re-sign Burnes and they prob shouldn't based on what he's going to ask for. Answer is Gunnar and it's not even really close.  Give the man whatever he wants and keep him indefinitely.  
    • Gunnar. He will add an All Star nod this year and is on an MVP pace. Higher WAR in fewer PA. 
    • Still a lot of things to shake out this year that IMO affects this decision.   1. Is Silent J the heir apparent to RF? 2. Is Beavers taking the next step and showing as a viable starting OF? 3. Is Fabian taking the next step to be a legit 4th OF who can play all 3 positions?   I will be very surprised if Taters is on the team next year. Honestly I think that if he is it will be due to failure of the young guys to show out. Good thing for us is we have enough of them that I don’t think that will happen.
    • He said after the game that he has five pitches, and if any three of them are working on a given night, he can mix them up enough to get batters out.  
    • He’s had quite the turnaround vs. LHP on this road trip.  Hopefully it continues all year!
    • Gunnar's definitely looking like the MVP of the Orioles and looks like priority #1 to me to get an extension. Burnes age works against him, because the O's maybe don't want to go longer than 5-6 years at most, but I could be wrong there. The Witt extension kind of set the parameters of what Gunnar will probably want at minimum. 2025 25 Kansas City Royals $8,111,111     2026 26 Kansas City Royals $14,111,111     2027 27 Kansas City Royals $20,111,111     2028 28 Kansas City Royals $31,111,111     2029 29 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2030 30 Kansas City Royals $36,111,111     2031 31 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2032 32 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2033 33 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2034 34 Kansas City Royals *$35,000,000   $35M Player Option 2035 35 Kansas City Royals *$33,000,000   $33M Team Option 2036 36 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team Option 2037 37 Kansas City Royals *$28,000,000   $28M Team
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...