Jump to content

Kurt Suzuki traded to the A's


Redskins Rick

Recommended Posts

So who made out better on Suzuki's round trip from Oakland to Washington and back? Last year it was Suzuki to the Nats for David Freitas, a catcher now in AAA at age 24. Now Suzuki goes back to Oakland for Dakota Bacus, a 22-year old pitcher with Oakland's high A club. I think Oakland got the better of this exchange because they made the playoffs last year without Suzuki, may make the playoffs again, and in the interim they avoided about $6 mm in salary obligations to a player who has been worth a total of 0.2 rWAR in the last two seasons combined. The Nats would have been in the playoffs last year with or without Suzuki, he's stunk this year, and they've had to pay about $6 mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yeah I was thinking this might be good for both the team and Hays. Chance for him to press the reset button if nothing else.聽
    • Actually, if you think about it, as long as there is a right handed pitcher with this lineup, once Westburg bats, there will always be 8 lefties in a row after that.聽馃
    • Sending Jackson down does nothing, there is nothing left to prove down there. He is taking good ABs, he is working counts, he looks fine in the field etc. I have used the Cowser comp, not to say he should be sent down, in the sense that Cowser looked particularly lost at times during his callup last year. Jackson is facing some professional adversity for the first time as a professional keep running him out there.聽 聽 The fortunate thing is he isn't聽hurting聽the team in a significant way right now, and when it finally does click the Orioles will be just that much better.聽
    • Actually move Westburg to 7th so there鈥檚 not so many lefties in a row.聽
    • I鈥檒l go with: Gunnar SS Adley C O鈥橦earn 1B Tony RF Westburg 3B Mullins CF Cowser LF Kjerstad DH Holliday 2B 聽
    • The question is, can he be productive playing just 1-2 times a week? We don't know because he's never really been in that role. Not everyone can stay productive in a part-time role. I think the Orioles will find a way to get him in the lineup 4-5 days a week. He can play corner outfield (except I would not play him in LF in Camden), DH and 1B. He still does not look great at 1B, but he can be serviceable if it means getting his bat into the lineup. That's a decent amount of ways to keep him and others fresh. Santander probably is at risk to sit a bit more than usual, but this also gives the Orioles an opportunity to have a very left-handed heavy lineup against righties at times, with Mountcastle sitting. The Orioles left-handed heavy lineup could be: 1. Henderson - SS 2. Rutschman - C 3. O'Hearn - 1B 4. Santander - RF 5. Cowser - LF 6. Mullins - CF 7. Westburg - 3B (R) 8. Kjerstad - DH 9. Holliday - 2B Imagine having to face that lineup and then have Mountcastle, McCann, Urias and Mateo for pinch running as a bench. Now don't get me wrong, Mountcastle is not going to be benched all that much, but Kjerstad could give Santander, Cowser, Mullins (with Cowser moving to CF), O'Hearn, Mountcastle, and Rutschman when he DHing a day off.聽 That's a lot of ways to keep him fresh and get his bat in the lineup. 聽
    • If so, probably just for 2 days or so. 聽
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...