Jump to content

The negativity has got to stop!!! (MAJOR RANT)


orioleslist

Recommended Posts

Just to add to my original post, I don't mind people being critical when there's a reason to be critical--AJ with half a baseball IQ would be a truly amazing player, and JJ's blown saves have hurt us tremendously, etc... That's merely stating the obvious... But when people start to refer to the O's as a complete joke, ignore the fact that we gained a game on TB this weekend (even though it wasn't the way we were hoping to do it), and start calling for Buck's head... that for me is totally over the top.

You don't have to agree with what I'm saying (writing, actually), but go back to today's game thread and you'll see that the negativity coming from some members is beyond disturbing. Maybe they're trolls or maybe they're not--but they're not contributing anything substantial to the discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Posters that jump on people for saying anything negative at all are just as bad. Specifically in the game thread. Not everything that happens during the game is positive, and its not terrible to post something negative. Usually the posts go as the team goes. Hence frustration the past few weeks, as this is an ORIOLES message board and the ORIOLES have not played well. It seems like some posters choose to take out their frustrations with the team on posters saying negative things, instead of just posting something themselves.

Also, this site is awesome and is the best team forum I have ever seen, but some posters attack others no matter what they post. Or quote posters every time they say something negative and troll them, but ignore their posts that are positive and useful and pretend they were never there.

But the bottom line for me is if you wanna see the site not have much negativity, the Orioles will simply need to play better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posters that jump on people for saying anything negative at all are just as bad. Specifically in the game thread. Not everything that happens during the game is positive, and its not terrible to post something negative. Usually the posts go as the team goes. Hence frustration the past few weeks, as this is an ORIOLES message board and the ORIOLES have not played well. It seems like some posters choose to take out their frustrations with the team on posters saying negative things, instead of just posting something themselves.

Also, this site is awesome and is the best team forum I have ever seen, but some posters attack others no matter what they post. Or quote posters every time they say something negative and troll them, but ignore their posts that are positive and useful and pretend they were never there.

But the bottom line for me is if you wanna see the site not have much negativity, the Orioles will simply need to play better.

Excellent post. And so true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can, but unless the result is a World Series title, this team will not have performed adequately IMO. I believe they have the core roster of a World Series team so that is my expectation. Competitive is not good enough, nor should it be for a team that has spent the past 30 years without a World Series appearance.

Then you see no difference between performance and result. If the Orioles go to the seventh game of the world series, and in the bottom of the ninth, down by a run with two outs and and a runner on base, Adam Jones smashes a shot that goes over the fence, but the center fielder makes a spectacular leap and barely pulls it in on the edge of his webbing for an out, then you would not be satisfied with the performance, but if the ball goes one inch to the side and goes for a winning home run, then you would be satisfied with the performance? So your satisfaction with the Orioles performance for the entire season would come down to the last play and whether the ball goes one inch to the side as it goes over the wall? I'd be satisfied with the performance either way, just not the result if the ball is caught. To differentiate the performance because the ball is one inch to the side and gets caught is an emotional response, not an analytical one. To use your own words, because of that one inch difference, the Orioles would not have "performed adequately."

You can also be satisfied with a team's overall performance, just not a specific one, such as when they won 109 games (their most ever) but lost the world series in 1969. Judging a team by how they do in the post season (i.e. not being satisfied with performance unless they win the world series) is mostly silly since once a team makes the playoffs it's statistically mostly random. The "better" teams are only slight favorites over the "weaker" playoff teams since at this point they are mostly all within ten wins of each other out of a 162 game season.

If the Orioles do not win the world series, I will not be satisfied. But that doesn't mean I'm not satisfied with their performance if they are in it until the end - with the nuance that if they don't win the world series, the top priority is to maximize the chances of winning the world series the next year, which mostly means doing what it takes to maximize their performance the next year. The best team does not always win the world series - see 1969.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posters that jump on people for saying anything negative at all are just as bad. Specifically in the game thread. Not everything that happens during the game is positive, and its not terrible to post something negative. Usually the posts go as the team goes. Hence frustration the past few weeks, as this is an ORIOLES message board and the ORIOLES have not played well. It seems like some posters choose to take out their frustrations with the team on posters saying negative things, instead of just posting something themselves.

Also, this site is awesome and is the best team forum I have ever seen, but some posters attack others no matter what they post. Or quote posters every time they say something negative and troll them, but ignore their posts that are positive and useful and pretend they were never there.

But the bottom line for me is if you wanna see the site not have much negativity, the Orioles will simply need to play better.

Its not that its just negative. Its "the season is over" BS and all the extra crap with fire them fire this etc. There is a difference between, "Wow, Manny has not hit a slider all season." "This team stinks we lose every game the season is over". After every bad play, swing, out. That is what is insanely annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not that its just negative. Its "the season is over" BS and all the extra crap with fire them fire this etc. There is a difference between, "Wow, Manny has not hit a slider all season." "This team stinks we lose every game the season is over". After every bad play, swing, out. That is what is insanely annoying.

Yeah I know I overreact and its too much alot of the time, but I think that's what's so great about the game. It can be going very poorly like today, then they score 7 runs, and everybody's all happy. We went from getting swept and shut out 2x in a row, to getting a huge win, and I think the game thread should probably reflect that change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And King Trea is back to unite the hoards....

He really hasn't said anything bad, at least from what I can see. This is what I was talking about. People like you just pounce on anything any poster says that can help you shed a negative light on them. But then you completely ignore posts that you can't find anything bad to say about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posters that jump on people for saying anything negative at all are just as bad. Specifically in the game thread. Not everything that happens during the game is positive, and its not terrible to post something negative.

Be critical all you want, but watch the words you use--WORDS HAVE MEANING... When you say the O's are a joke, YOU are the joke... Use facts and numbers to support your argument, but don't go out and post:

Typical Orioles. Absolute BS. Bunch of losers this team has.

or proclaim:

This team is pathetic.

This team is NOT pathetic. This team is FAR from being pathetic. We are 9 games over .500, 3 games away from the playoffs. Might seem like a failure to you, who is probably too young to realize what was going on between 1998-2001, but let me assure you that most of us older fans are THRILLED to have our team in the midst or a playoff race with a month of baseball to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not that its just negative. Its "the season is over" BS and all the extra crap with fire them fire this etc. There is a difference between, "Wow, Manny has not hit a slider all season." "This team stinks we lose every game the season is over". After every bad play, swing, out. That is what is insanely annoying.

Agreed. When someone posts that we should replace Jim Johnson as closer because he's blow nine saves, or bench Markakis against lefties because he's not hitting them, that's not necessarily negative; that's analysis. The analysis may be wrong, but that's what discussion is all about. When someone says we have no chance of making the playoffs (despite only being 3 games out with 27 to go) because of our pitching, or our lack of clutch hitting, or something similar, that's just pointless negativism that doesn't add anything to a discussion. We're in a playoff race, and anyone who thinks otherwise isn'tthinking, as their postings often make clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a message board. It isn't real, it's like a mask. In my field, the theatre, when you give people a mask to work with it brings out amazing things you never saw in the person before. Not all of those things were appealing. I would be surprised if virtually every one here didn't have ulterior motives for posting, conscious or unconscious, that had little or nothing to do with the O's, myself included. It's the nature of the beast. You just have to figure out how to separate the chaff from the bran. I do find that some of the most interesting and knowledgeable posters are posting less. I certainly miss reading guys like Vateck, and Baltimoron, e.g., more often. That's a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a message board. It isn't real, it's like a mask. In my field, the theatre, when you give people a mask to work with it brings out amazing things you never saw in the person before. Not all of those things were appealing. I would be surprised if virtually every one here didn't have ulterior motives for posting, conscious or unconscious, that had little or nothing to do with the O's, myself included. It's the nature of the beast. You just have to figure out how to separate the chaff from the bran. I do find that some of the most interesting and knowledgeable posters are posting less. I certainly miss reading guys like Vateck, and Baltimoron, e.g., more often. That's a shame.

You're one of my favorites Gordo and you're right! I miss a lot of posters that now skip the GT because it's so negative. Can't hardly get a word in edgewise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where I disagree with the OP is starting a thread mainly to single certain people out. We've all vented a lot of frustration with the way the team has performed in the past six weeks. No one is an honorary crew member with Jim Hunter on the Good Ship Lollipop. However, there are people who consistently don't say much, if anything, in the game threads until the stuff hits the fan, and complain, then wait on the bench until it's time to complain again. If all you have to offer is complaints, then that's where it becomes really tedious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...