Jump to content

With yesterday's HR, is there ANY chance Chris Davis could get MVP?


markakis8

Recommended Posts

While the above post may be sarcasm, using it as an opportunity to show some key areas of the game where Trout has a huge advantage.

Double Plays:

Cabrera has grounded into 9 more double plays this year than Trout

Extra bases/baserunning:

Trout takes an extra base 57% of the time while Cabrera is at 29%.

Trout has reached third 23 times out of 39 chances when on 1B when a single is hit, compared to 6 out of 48 for Cabrera.

Trout has scored from 2nd on a single 15 out of 20 times, compared to 10 out of 19 for Cabrera.

Trout has 26 net steals (SB - CS) compared to 3 for Cabrera.

Trout has been caught stealing 7 times Cabrera zero times. I think getting caught 7 times in 40 attempts makes that a neutral stat at best. Trout has also been picked off 3 times that are not included in his caught stealing stats. Cabrera has not been picked off this year. I would say stealing goes to Cabrera.

Also Cabrera has been out on the base path 3 times to Trouts 5 times. And Cabrera has advanced 23 times due to fly balls, passed balls, wild pitched to Trouts 20 times.

The first to third stats do seem to favor Trout significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Trout has been caught stealing 7 times Cabrera zero times. I think getting caught 7 times in 40 attempts makes that a neutral stat at best. Trout has also been picked off 3 times that are not included in his caught stealing stats. Cabrera has not been picked off this year. I would say stealing goes to Cabrera.

Also Cabrera has been out on the base path 3 times to Trouts 5 times. And Cabrera has advanced 23 times due to fly balls, passed balls, wild pitched to Trouts 20 times.

The first to third stats do seem to favor Trout significantly.

This post is absolutely ridiculous. An 85 % SB rate is very good. Just a simple question for you, there are three major aspects to a players game: Fielding, batting, and base running right? Bhat percent of value would you give to each. It would seem that it is 80% Batting, 15 % fielding and 5% base running for you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post is absolutely ridiculous. An 85 % SB rate is very good. Just a simple question for you, there are three major aspects to a players game: Fielding, batting, and base running right? Bhat percent of value would you give to each. It would seem that it is 80% Batting, 15 % fielding and 5% base running for you.

He doesn't have 80 percent rate. He has 33 steals. He was picked off 3 times and caught stealing 7 times. That is 76 percent rate. I believe that is close to the break even rate for steals being helpful to your team. He was also thrown out on the bases 15 times in total. I am guessing that would lead the Orioles.

I would say that fielding is 50 percent. But Trout is rated below average when he plays centerfield. He gets the high offensive WAR when he plays centerfield. I think people are overrating Trout. His baserunning isn't stellar. He gets thrown out a lot. 15 times on the bases to Cabreras 3 times. Cabrera isn't a terrible third baseman in the games I have seen him play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I found this article that states that the break even rate on stolen bases depends on the guys home run rates behind you and it states that with nobody out Mike Trouts break even rate with no outs is 76.2% and with one out it is 74.9%.

Here is the link http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2013/2/20/3980504/individual-stolen-base-break-even-rates

So it appears his rate is just about neutral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't have 80 percent rate. He has 33 steals. He was picked off 3 times and caught stealing 7 times. That is 76 percent rate. I believe that is close to the break even rate for steals being helpful to your team. He was also thrown out on the bases 15 times in total. I am guessing that would lead the Orioles.

I would say that fielding is 50 percent. But Trout is rated below average when he plays centerfield. He gets the high offensive WAR when he plays centerfield. I think people are overrating Trout. His baserunning isn't stellar. He gets thrown out a lot. 15 times on the bases to Cabreras 3 times. Cabrera isn't a terrible third baseman in the games I have seen him play.

That's why you have frameworks like WAR that take break-even rates on various events into account and apply them consistently to all players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't have 80 percent rate. He has 33 steals. He was picked off 3 times and caught stealing 7 times. That is 76 percent rate. I believe that is close to the break even rate for steals being helpful to your team. He was also thrown out on the bases 15 times in total. I am guessing that would lead the Orioles.

I would say that fielding is 50 percent. But Trout is rated below average when he plays centerfield. He gets the high offensive WAR when he plays centerfield. I think people are overrating Trout. His baserunning isn't stellar. He gets thrown out a lot. 15 times on the bases to Cabreras 3 times. Cabrera isn't a terrible third baseman in the games I have seen him play.

I give up, you're hopeless. You attempt, albeit clumsily, to use metrics to prove Trout is a poor base runner/defender, but you claim Cabrera to be a OK fielder based on what you've seen? BTW his SB rate is 82.5% break even is 79% IIRC. Being picked off doesn't factor in to his SB rate. The fact is Trout is a good base runner, good OF, and a very good hitter. Cabrera is an excellent hitter, poor base runner, and one of the poorest fielding 3B in the game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give up, you're hopeless. You attempt, albeit clumsily, to use metrics to prove Trout is a poor base runner/defender, but you claim Cabrera to be a OK fielder based on what you've seen? BTW his SB rate is 82.5% break even is 79% IIRC. Being picked off doesn't factor in to his SB rate. The fact is Trout is a good base runner, good OF, and a very good hitter. Cabrera is an excellent hitter, poor base runner, and one of the poorest fielding 3B in the game.

If you are picked off it is usually because you are trying to get a big lead so you can steal. I put in the caught stealing rate. You can ignore it and pick stats to make a blayer look better than he is. Cabrera is not a poor base runner. He doesn't get picked off he doesn't thrown out on the base paths. He might not be fast but that does not make him a poor base runner. Nothing clumsy about the stats. I showed the real stats and gave you links to back it up. Whatever you obvioulsy don't care about stats.

As for Cabrera he moved to third to help the team. He plays a decent first base but the team signed Fielder and he didn't complain. I don't know why you are defending Trout so ilogically. Are you an Angels fan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I found this article that states that the break even rate on stolen bases depends on the guys home run rates behind you and it states that with nobody out Mike Trouts break even rate with no outs is 76.2% and with one out it is 74.9%.

Here is the link http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2013/2/20/3980504/individual-stolen-base-break-even-rates

So it appears his rate is just about neutral.

For what it's worth, Baseball Prospectus has a stat called "baserunning runs" that measures all the effects of players on the bases. Trout is at +3.0, Cabrera at -2.1. Of Trout's 3.0 total, 0.99 comes from stolen bases.

Also, if you look at the compenents of rWAR, Trout is worth +6 baserunning runs, Cabrera is at 0. So, using either measure, Trout is worth 5-6 more runs (.5-.6 wins) based on his baserunning. It is not a huge component of his rWAR total.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are picked off it is usually because you are trying to get a big lead so you can steal. I put in the caught stealing rate. You can ignore it and pick stats to make a blayer look better than he is. Cabrera is not a poor base runner. He doesn't get picked off he doesn't thrown out on the base paths. He might not be fast but that does not make him a poor base runner. Nothing clumsy about the stats. I showed the real stats and gave you links to back it up. Whatever you obvioulsy don't care about stats.

As for Cabrera he moved to third to help the team. He plays a decent first base but the team signed Fielder and he didn't complain. I don't know why you are defending Trout so ilogically. Are you an Angels fan?

What do you mean by illogically? By what systematic, logical method or framework is Cabrera better than Trout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis is now tied with Cabrera in Runs and RBIs. All the fancier composite stats aside, I feel like those two stats are the most important for determining the value a player has brought to his team on offense. If Davis ends up ahead of Cabrera in Runs, RBIs, 2bs & HRs and the O's make the playoffs, I think Davis should get legitimate consideration for MVP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis is now tied with Cabrera in Runs and RBIs. All the fancier composite stats aside, I feel like those two stats are the most important for determining the value a player has brought to his team on offense. If Davis ends up ahead of Cabrera in Runs, RBIs, 2bs & HRs and the O's make the playoffs, I think Davis should get legitimate consideration for MVP.

In the minds of many MVP voters, yes. In reality, not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...