Jump to content

Manny Machado in 2014


webbrick2010

Recommended Posts

Manny Machado in 2014???

Manny?s OPS+ is now 100 (replacement level), after posting a 98 in 2012.

Worse he has posted a .240/.267/.373/.640 since Jul 2nd.

Obviously he has worn down and/or the league has made adjustments.

We need Manny to be an all star cornerstone of the franchise and yet his OPS of .750 (and sinking rapidly) does not really stack up well at 3B, where he is only 9th in the majors.

So is he a .260/.300/.400 JJ Hardy type hitter that needs to be moved to SS to be considered near the top of his position or will he have a more even offensive season and hit .290+

It really scares me that his walk rate is so low? and he seems to be trying to pull everything.

Right now batting him second is even worse than JJ Hardy was last year.

At any rate I think the O?s will hold off on any extension for at least another year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm pretty sure he will continue to swing at the bad slider! :)

Manny has definitely regressed due to adjustments/fatigue, but I still think he's going to be a .280/.320/.450 guy who plays great defense. I think he'll be better than that in a few years.

I see that as his floor. If he starts to fill out, and those flyouts and 2B turn into HR, he's going to be a superstar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure he will continue to swing at the bad slider! :)

Manny has definitely regressed due to adjustments/fatigue, but I still think he's going to be a .280/.320/.450 guy who plays great defense. I think he'll be better than that in a few years.

I am really not worried about Manny. What he does next season is not an issue to

me. I will cross that bridge when I come to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure he will continue to swing at the bad slider! :)

Manny has definitely regressed due to adjustments/fatigue, but I still think he's going to be a .280/.320/.450 guy who plays great defense. I think he'll be better than that in a few years.

Yeah, a .770 OPS in his prime will be a disappointment to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly why I said giving him a 10 year contract and breaking the bank would be absurd. Just completely moronic. Let's find out if he can actually hit.

Give teams 162 games worth of slider chasing and no plate discipline to analyze on video.

Then see what happens in 2014 and while were at it let's see what happens in 2015.

He couldn't be farther away from being a proven offensive player. That's not his fault, but his lack of service time really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly why I said giving him a 10 year contract and breaking the bank would be absurd. Just completely moronic. Let's find out if he can actually hit.

Give teams 162 games worth of slider chasing and no plate discipline to analyze on video.

Then see what happens in 2014 and while were at it let's see what happens in 2015.

He couldn't be farther away from being a proven offensive player. That's not his fault, but his lack of service time really.

The idea of giving him a 10-year contract now is so that you wouldn't break the bank, compared to what he'll likely cost if we wait and he develops as we expect. There has to be both risk and reward in any deal like that. But I certainly agree with you that Manny's struggles the last few months highlight the downside to inking a long-term deal now.

It's all a matter of money. 10 years, $30 mm? Done, and it's a no-brainer. 10 years, $100 mm? Probably not a deal you'd do right now. But somewhere between $30 mm and $100 mm, there is a 10-year deal that would make sense for both sides if the O's had an appetite for some risk and Manny had an appetite for long-term security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The kid just needs to improve his pitch recognition and hitting approach. Hopefully those things will naturally get better with age. It would be ideal for the team to sign a vet with a patient/selective approach not only to help the lineup but to able to show a different approach to young players rather than the guys that have the "want to".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

]Who leads the AL in outs made by a mile[/b]? You see any 1 stat can be thrown out there.
Good question. That would be the person with enough PA to qualify for the batting title, with the lowest OBP. Somehow I don't think .313 OBP is the lowest. It's not even the lowest on the team. Do you have any idea of what you are talking about?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...