Jump to content

Per ESPN: Orioles need to make a bold statement this offseason...


MemorialStadKid

Recommended Posts

Mods may want to change the thread title. The OP link is to an ESPN insider article, not SI. It talks about the Yankees, Giants, and Orioles. Here is an excerpt from the Orioles portion of the article.

They pay people to do this stuff? Hell, 85% of the Hangouters could have written this article!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Can't be altogether serious when he suggests trading Wieters to a team that already has a 23-year-old 4+ win catcher under team control through 2019.

While we're at it we could try trading Chris Davis to the Tigers, and Jim Johnson to the Reds.

I don't know how he meant it, but the fact that no one has even bothered to pick apart the "ho hum, just trade some stuff for David Price" part of the plan tells you how unrealistic the other stuff is.

Based on the poster, I'd say HE was dead serious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade Matt W. to KC for Butler and prospects.

Go with Clevenger. Sign or promote a backup catcher.

Get Price somehow.

Make an FA bullpen signing.

We're good to go.

MSK

Stick with Cleavenger? The 3 main skills needed in baseball is to be able to catch, throw, and hit a baseball. Cleavenger only does 2 of those things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bold moves are so 1990. Ever since Moneyball the smart teams are all into italicized moves. DD has already ventured into subscripts, but that might just be another Korean misadventure.

Who would have guessed that this years' undervalued resource would have been Pitchers with broken arms, and Catchers trying to learn first base with degenerative hip conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know how he meant it, but the fact that no one has even bothered to pick apart the "ho hum, just trade some stuff for David Price" part of the plan tells you how unrealistic the other stuff is.

Next he will post a thread about how we can get Mike Stanton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What good is a statement if it doesn't help you win? See: Blue Jays, Toronto.

Did the Red Sox make statements last offseason? Not really, they just signed a bunch of solid dudes. The O's just need to put together a good team, they don't need to "make a statement".

The Red Sox dumped a lot of payroll during the season and turned around and spent the savings in the offseason, so I'd say they made a statement. 2012 starting payroll, $173M, 2013, $159M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see the Orioles extend their window past the current two year window and solidify a solid 4 player core for 2016. (Manny, Jones, Davis Extension, Traded for Player). If they can extend Wieters later at the right price then that is a solid 5 player core for 2016.

Would be nice if that core included a starting pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Per Roch:   For the Orioles Gunnar Henderson SS Jordan Westburg 2B Anthony Santander RF Colton Cowser LF Adley Rutschman C Ryan O’Hearn DH Ryan Mountcastle 1B Cedric Mullins CF Ramón Urías 3B Cade Povich LHP For the Twins Manuel Margot RF Carlos Correa SS Byron Buxton CF Carlos Santana 1B Royce Lewis 3B Kyle Farmer 2B Ryan Jeffers DH Christian Vázquez C Willi Castro LF Pablo López RHP    
    • That would be pretty cool. Just do me a favor and please don't start the magic number thread in June next season.
    • There’s another accomplishment from 1983 I’d like to match.  
    • I'm more of a Prime Number guy, I'm happy enough with 89. Round numbers are for suckers.   Pretty disheartening they haven't managed to reach that relatively meager goal in 40 years.
    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...