Jump to content

Possible Interest in Scott Kazmir


orioles4lyfe

Recommended Posts

Doesn't that just mean the owners will take more profit? I don't see salary caps translating into lower ticket prices, free cable tv, or anything else that would be good for fans.

Good points, but I think a reasonable level playing field is quite a perk to fans. Heck, accept for the Jags, anyone could have made the playoffs this year. Even they are in a weak division, anything can happen in the NFL. Not so much in MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Tampa has more budget limitations than the Orioles, so you really can't use them as a comparison for not spending.

I am not saying that Tampa's payroll should match the O's.

I am saying Tampa is probably going to pocket the extra 25 million from the new TV deal.

Not sure what their budget limitations have to do with that. The O's are not likely to jump to 116 million and the Rays are not likely to jump to 82 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allot of people are stunned that his contract went for $22!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It seems pretty crazy for a guy who was pitching in the Atlantic League in 2012. He had a solid year last year and I would have been happy to see him sign with the O's but I don't know about that contract. At least it's a short deal in case it backfires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Salary caps will come soon too. It's getting crazy. 300M for a 31 year old Cano? 100M for Ervin Santana. Players are asking for wayyy too much

I don't know... I could see the MLBPA going for a knock down DRRRRAAAG out strike over that. I don't see how either side would want that to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know... I could see the MLBPA going for a knock down DRRRRAAAG out strike over that. I don't see how either side would want that to happen.

Caps include floors, I can think of a couple owners that would be upset at a floor.

In the NFL players get 48% of the revenue, in the NBA 51.15.

Are we sure the MLB owners would want that? The Rockies owner just said his team was under 50% last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caps include floors, I can think of a couple owners that would be upset at a floor.

In the NFL players get 48% of the revenue, in the NBA 51.15.

Are we sure the MLB owners would want that? The Rockies owner just said his team was under 50% last season.

I don't know about the floor. I could see a growing cap, like inflation adjusted. And generously so growing. But theyr'e ALL making tons of money, players, owners, and MLB itself. Raking it in hand over fist. Why would any side push to change that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about the floor. I could see a growing cap, like inflation adjusted. And generously so growing. But theyr'e ALL making tons of money, players, owners, and MLB itself. Raking it in hand over fist. Why would any side push to change that?

They won't. Why do you think there hasn't been any strife in labor negotiations recently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They won't. Why do you think there hasn't been any strife in labor negotiations recently?

Exactly that! They're all making money. Basically have had labor peace for 20 years now. All that bad will after the 1994 strike is still melting away more and more every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I did it again!   9/9, all played for the Orioles.   36 points.  
    • He's at -.2 right now so yea, he'd need to exceed three wins the rest of the way.  Seems a bit too optimistic for me right now. Pretty fair cutoff point.
    • Sure, but would they add him to their 26 man roster and let him stink/rehab in the majors?   I doubt it.    
    • I imagine that if the team has another great season AND they resign any of the young star(s) or a big time FA or retain Burnes to a big contract, attendance will go up again next year regardless of opponent. That’s how this thing goes with competent ownership and a bunch of young star players. I know some people believe that the public/fans will just show up. But we are in an age where people are more informed than ever because of access to information through the internet. The difference between now and the last time the O’s were good 12- 16 is two things IMO. 1) That all felt temporary. And as a fanbase we carried a large degree of anxiety worrying when the other shoe would drop and it would all be over. 2) This time feels like the org has much more of a plan/vision/competence. Last time felt accidental to a degree. Now it very much feels that we have a great foundation that is sustainable for long term success. Maybe even a dynasty? Because baseball is at the end of the day an entertainment business, people are going to invest/spend money/show up at the games based on how it makes them feel. If they feel good, hopeful and believe they will keep coming. If they are worried and it’s an anxious experience when they think this will all be over soon, they are not going to be as apt to invest in that thing (whatever it may be).
    • Nothing stopping the O's from Non-tendering him in the offseason so no difference in job security. I get where you are coming from, to me it seems like additional risk without additional reward.
    • Zippy chance Hays goes anywhere. One, it’s SSS.  You just can’t cut guys during slumps.  You’re never going to have all 9 guys tearing it up at the same time. Everyone is over Urias because Holliday is up. Holliday is struggling. What’s next move onto whatever player is in a slump?  Mountcastle has cooled off. He better get it together 😢
    • I voted over. Bat to ball skills are elite. He will hit. He has defensive value that will show as he gets more comfortable at 2B. His speed and base running also add value. He's at least a 3 fWAR player.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...