Jump to content

PBT ranks baseballs worst off-seasons


sambowen

Recommended Posts

I don't understand the "offseason isn't over yet" comments. What's wrong with judging things up until a certain point? We do that anyway during the season. If we were 20 games under .500 at the halfway point I guarantee you there wouldn't be many posters on here saying "Well it's not over yet!" Nope, we'd be all whining about what a horrible season it's been.

Well, it's not quite the same. Early season games actually count in the standings. Winning some games late in the season won't rescue your season if you lost too many games early on. In contrast, having a successful offseason only depends on who you sign/acquire, not when you acquired them. In theory, the O's could still put themselves in position to contend in 2014--for instance, they could sign Arroyo, Rodney and Cruz (not that I'd agree with signing Cruz, but he'd certainly improve the O's lineup in the short term).

It's not too soon to say that good options are dwindling, and it's not too soon to say that what we've seen and heard so far doesn't inspire much confidence for the rest of the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The offseason is over when pitchers and catchers report. By then, most free agents have found a team.

True. Most hitters of any consequence have found a home by now though. There is some starting pitching available but we've announced we're not competing for Tanaka and the 3 other most attractive starters will cost us our 1st round pick which combined with the $ almost certain to be involved makes them a less attractive option.

We could make a trade anytime but again, as teams meet their needs and fill their rosters, trades become more complicated.

We'll see how it ends but I think most of us believe we'll add a reliever and maybe a 2nd rate starter and be left to cross our fingers and toes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. Most hitters of any consequence have found a home by now though. There is some starting pitching available but we've announced we're not competing for Tanaka and the 3 other most attractive starters will cost us our 1st round pick which combined with the $ almost certain to be involved makes them a less attractive option.

We could make a trade anytime but again, as teams meet their needs and fill their rosters, trades become more complicated.

We'll see how it ends but I think most of us believe we'll add a reliever and maybe a 2nd rate starter and be left to cross our fingers and toes.

Garza, Arroyo, Burnett and Hammel won't cost a pick.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious question - when do you consider the offseason "over?"

Late February or when most of the talented players are off the marketplace?

I always feel that the offseason is over once there's no one left who can enhance the club's chances at a championship run.

Right now, I don't believe the door is shut, but we're like 85% of the way there.

MSK

I do think some good options have been foreclosed, but there are a number of players we could acquire who would significantly change how our offseason is judged, so I prefer to wait before handing out a grade. Let's revisit this thread right before ST begins and review what changed, if anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think some good options have been foreclosed, but there are a number of players we could acquire who would significantly change how our offseason is judged, so I prefer to wait before handing out a grade. Let's revisit this thread right before ST begins and review what changed, if anything.
Just curious, what options do you think have been foreclosed? I would have liked Morrison or Hart, Balfour, possibly Beltran.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles won 85 games last season. They did that after finishing with a losing record in August and September (26-28), a losing record on the road (39-42), a losing record against the American League East (36-40) and a losing record in one-run games (20-31).

The 2013 Orioles finished 10th in the American League in team ERA and 12th in starting pitcher ERA. That team's closer suffered nine blown saves, the O's had a late six-game losing streak and they didn't hit much at all during the last month.

They still won 85 games.

Keep that in mind before you predict 72 wins for the coming season.

http://www.masnsports.com/steve_melewski/2014/01/are-dire-predictions-going-to-come-true-for-the-orioles.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Steve phoned this one in, do you think he had a hangover or not?

I'd guess not because when I'm hungover I don't go around looking for silver linings or write too-cute-by-half columns trying to gloss over the fact that the inaction coming from the Warehouse at this point is simply impossible to ignore or successfully spin.

Fed up with ownership? No not me, not at all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When Steve phoned this one in, do you think he had a hangover or not?

I'd guess not because when I'm hungover I don't go around looking for silver linings or write too-cute-by-half columns trying to gloss over the fact that the inaction coming from the Warehouse at this point is simply impossible to ignore or successfully spin.

Fed up with ownership? No not me, not at all...

[video=youtube;5vIIZydXDqg]

:noidea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garza, Arroyo, Burnett and Hammel won't cost a pick.

I said I could see us add a 2nd rate starter and Arroyo and Hammel both fit that description for me. There has been nothing to suggest we'd pay Garza's price tag.

I suppose Burnett could decide he wants to play and could decide to give us a shot and we could decide to meet his price and he could be good back in the AL East where he wasn't so good the last time around.

Right, I'm fairly comfortable rating our offseason assuming some 2nd rate starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said I could see us add a 2nd rate starter and Arroyo and Hammel both fit that description for me. There has been nothing to suggest we'd pay Garza's price tag.

I suppose Burnett could decide he wants to play and could decide to give us a shot and we could decide to meet his price and he could be good back in the AL East where he wasn't so good the last time around.

Right, I'm fairly comfortable rating our offseason assuming some 2nd rate starter.

Anyone who can give you 200 IP in 8 out of the last 9 seasons is hardly second rate in my book. And we have no idea what Garza's price would be yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So they brought back their first baseman on a team friendly deal and added Heath Bell, who it is rumored they may flip, and Ryan Hanigan and his 58 OPS+. What a coup :cool:

It's not about coups, or big splashes, or whatever. It's about maximum return for your available resources. This quote from that article basically sums up what makes a good offseason:

"The Rays adequately addressed all of their needs and didn?t get bogged down by a big, expensive contract as is their habit. A pretty standard, productive off-season for them."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • I would go Bradish game 1, no question. He's earned it Means game 2 because it's in Camden Yards. Teams will put righties up to face him and we have Waltimore to help protect against the long ball Grayson game 3 on the road Tough choice between Gibson or Kremer for game 4, but I bet Hyde gives the vet the nod. I think that means Bradish is available for game 5
    • I understand your point, but 40 HRs with a solid OBP won’t be a waste no matter where he plays.
    • Adley -  Had pretty much the same results as last year while playing 39 more games which are simply outstanding for a catcher. Handled the pitching staff as a leader, controlled the running game and hit well - 810 OPS. But his offense was very different this year.   In 2002 he hit righties - 889 OPS vs lefties - 552 OPS.  In 2023 he flipped that righties -778 OPS vs lefties  - 895 OPS.   He hits much better as a DH (874 OPS) vs C (786 OPS).  He is an on base machine 374 OBP.   He leads the team and the winning culture with his attitude and hugs. Grade A McCann - Agree Mountcastle - In an injury plagued year that cost him 132 at bats his biggest improvement was to his OBP at 328 compared to 309 in 2021 and 305 in 2022.   He seemed to adjust to the wall that has cost him power by hitting more up the middle.  While sharing 1B with O'Hearn instead of Mancini and DH with Adley he killed lefties with a 1052 OPS but fell off vs righties with a 640 OPS.  He seem like a platoon player at times.    He hit better as a DH (900 OPS) vs 1B (754). None of this is consistent on a year over year basis.  Some years he hits rights better, some years lefties, some years better as a 1B and some as a DH.    Grade  C+ while noting his improved OBP which is major IMO. O'Hearn - Agree Frazier - Agree Gunnar -  He has come so far so fast.  Deserves MVO.  Took over SS.  Much better SS than 3B at this point IMO.   Offensive weapon.  Grade A+ Urias -  Fell off in power from 16 HR to 4 HR and drop in  defense may have cost him his spot on the roster.  Grade D+ Mateo - Began the season as a potential starting SS but became a Backup SS.  As a utility player his speed on the base path and ability to steal (32 steals) is a weapon.    A game changer in close games which the O's play a lot.   Defense at SS dropped from elite to be roughly compared to Gunnar which is still a very high level.  Can't hit.  Grade as a utility player is a B-. Hays -  Has become a first half player over the last two years.  All-Star first half followed by a beat up body that costs him offensively in the 2nd half.  He plays hard.  Defensive standout in spite of losing speed as the year goes on due to injuries he plays through.  Wall has cost him some power but like Mountcastle the improved OBP to 325 is a impressive.  Agree with B- grade. Mullins - Agree.  Injuries cost him greatly.  Amazing he can play defense at such a high level even with the injuries. Grade C+ but an All Star when healthy. Santander - Agree Hicks - Wow.  Where did that come from.  Showed up at just the right time with Mullins injury and was a solid performer.   Unexpected.   Not the best backup centerfielder because his speed is average but can catch what he gets to.  Fine in the corners. Grade B- McKenna  - Agree Westburg -  Better that expected at 2B.  Rangy.  Solid.  Not as good at 3B.  SS only in emergencies.   Nice break in to the majors.  Future looks bright.  Grade B looks good.
    • If you play  Texas, they are excellent Vs righties or lefties. OPaCY is much tougher on lefties (and righties) than Globe Field is. So, you may go with GRod in game 2 because the lefties are going to struggle to hit more in OPACY anyway but at the end of the day, it may not make of a difference. They also may just want the rookie pitching at home. Kyle Gibson is intriguing. He has a high OPS against the Rangers but he pitched for them in 2021 And he has a sub 3 ErA at home that year. In its first full year, Globe had a 97 park effect. This year it’s 106.  So that’s a factor too.  
    • Thanks for a great detailed report @Frobby. I'm not sure I understand how the stats for Rutschman and McCann warrant identical B- grades. Sure... Adley missed high expectations and McCann was better than last year's backups, but for me their "test scores" would not each receive the same grade. 
    • Personally I’d rather see Means start a game at Camden than on the road.
    • Texas has more guys hitting from the left side overall, a 50/50 split this year hitting as righties or lefties. Tampa Bay had only 38% of their ABs as lefties. But I think we can beat either team. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...