Jump to content

If we give up a draft pick for Kendrys Morales I will hammer a railroad spike through my head


SrMeowMeow

Recommended Posts

It wouldn't be the loss of a pick that's an issue, it would be the entrance of another exhibit into evidence that the organization doesn't seem to have a coherent proactive approach to building a roster.

I knew I loved you for a reason. Despite the alliteration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 247
  • Created
  • Last Reply
How so? For the sake of argument, if the O's identify a FA who fills a need at a reasonable financial cost, and who also costs a draft pick, wouldn't adding such a player make sense if he furthers the cause of reaching the postseason during what many seem to consider a closing window?

The O's haven't exactly been major players in FA over the last...lots of years...so I don't see how making a calculated departure from that history for a particular player indicates that the O's organizational philosophy lacks coherence.

Can an organization with a coherent plan not invest in both the FA market and the draft?

You think adding one player, say Morales, is the missing link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How so? For the sake of argument, if the O's identify a FA who fills a need at a reasonable financial cost, and who also costs a draft pick, wouldn't adding such a player make sense if he furthers the cause of reaching the postseason during what many seem to consider a closing window?

The O's haven't exactly been major players in FA over the last...lots of years...so I don't see how making a calculated departure from that history for a particular player indicates that the O's organizational philosophy lacks coherence.

Can an organization with a coherent plan not invest in both the FA market and the draft?

http://www.sportingnews.com/mlb/story/2013-12-30/the-screwball-why-kendrys-morales-is-a-better-investment-than-nelson-cruz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kendrys Morales OPS in 2013 was .780 against RHP, .794 against LHP.

Xavier Paul's OPS in 2013 was .775 against RHP.

Steve Pearce's OPS in 2013 was .802 against LHP.

Factoring in park effects, I'll concede that Kendrys Morales would likely outproduce a platoon of Xavier Paul and Steve Pearce in 2014. But will the difference be so great to justify losing a first round pick?

One thing I know for sure--this team needs to upgrade its pitching more than it needs to upgrade its lineup. Once this team signs Bronson Arroyo and a decent closer, then I can ponder whether it's worth sacrificing a bit of the future to sign Morales. The worst outcome would be signing Morales and having to go with "internal options" for the bullpen and rotation due to lack of funds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think adding one player, say Morales, is the missing link?

No, but I also don't swing to the opposite pole and conclude that his signing would signal continued the continued inability of the O's to form an organizational plan. It just seemed like a pretty strong statement, so I was wondering what lies beneath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kendrys Morales OPS in 2013 was .780 against RHP, .794 against LHP.

Xavier Paul's OPS in 2013 was .775 against RHP.

Steve Pearce's OPS in 2013 was .802 against LHP.

Factoring in park effects, I'll concede that Kendrys Morales would likely outproduce a platoon of Xavier Paul and Steve Pearce in 2014. But will the difference be so great to justify losing a first round pick?

One thing I know for sure--this team needs to upgrade its pitching more than it needs to upgrade its lineup. Once this team signs Bronson Arroyo and a decent closer, then I can ponder whether it's worth sacrificing a bit of the future to sign Morales. The worst outcome would be signing Morales and having to go with "internal options" for the bullpen and rotation due to lack of funds.

It's all about the pitching.

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/138193-Tanaka-To-Be-Posted/page13

http://forum.orioleshangout.com/forums/showthread.php/137981-Orioles-Met-with-Burnett-s-Agent/page9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, but I also don't swing to the opposite pole and conclude that his signing would signal continued the continued inability of the O's to form an organizational plan. It just seemed like a pretty strong statement, so I was wondering what lies beneath.

With their lack of an organizational plan I don't think one signing suddenly changes that, or is even the right move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year our OPS+ was 99 and our ERA+ was 100. Too many people overate the offense and underrate the pitching imo. They both need to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With their lack of an organizational plan I don't think one signing suddenly changes that, or is even the right move.

Let there be a new plan. A glorious plan. A plan filled with Morales and Garza and Jimenez. Let the rest of MLB stand in awe of the new plan.

And then someone get a towel for SrMeowMeow. Because, you know...the spike thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, basically this, that Westburg's underlying numbers (EV, barrel %, xwOBA) seem to point at this being pretty real, or at least that there's nothing 'undeserved / lucky' about this hot streak, if it's just that. 
    • The problem with a Cowser/Kjerstad/Stowers/Bradfield outfield roster is there are no right handers to handle LHP. I don't think and completely left handed outfield is the destination for an organization the values versatility.
    • Looks maybe concussion related. 
    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...