Jump to content

Orioles have agreed to terms with OF Tyler Colvin


Greg

Recommended Posts

That sounds like what you can disclose about a player already under contract on your team.

Why would that matter? The player would have to sign a release for pre employment physical anyway. Anecodotally, both the Cubs and Red Sox discussed Dan Haren's hip when he wasn't under their control.

Keep in mind that players injuries are very public by there nature. The employment- related phase deals with what type of injuries can be discussed i.e. TJ is okay while diabetes isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 508
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It seems you are implying that the O's have killed 2 out of 2 deals this offseason due to physicals. If so, you are so ridiculously wrong as to be full of it.

Peguero

Webb

Casilla

DeJesus

Lough

Brach

Escalona

De La Cruz

Hendriks

Monell

Weeks

Young

Aceves

All passed physicals and were added to the 40 man or signed to minor league contracts with invitations to ST.

C'mon Man. Never let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of those guys are on minor league contracts. Is it standard procedure to fly those guys into Baltimore and give them physicals? I don't know but I don't think so. I bet those guys are just given physicals when they report to ST.

I think that may be correct or reports exchanged electronically? Good question there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW in an interview recently on XM MLB, Gutherie said he didn't think the O's physical was any different than ones he has taken with other clubs. It is how the results are evaluated.

I miss Guts...seems like a real class act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to an interview with Buck on XM MLB this morning, he mentioned having 10 OF coming to ST, then corrected himself and said "it's 11 now" Could they have finally cleared Colvin's physical? Who are the OF expected in camp this spring? AJ,Nick, Lough, Peguero, Reimold, Pearce, Urrutia, Young, Berry, who else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to an interview with Buck on XM MLB this morning, he mentioned having 10 OF coming to ST, then corrected himself and said "it's 11 now" Could they have finally cleared Colvin's physical? Who are the OF expected in camp this spring? AJ,Nick, Lough, Peguero, Reimold, Pearce, Urrutia, Young, Berry, who else?

Xavier Paul would be 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listening to an interview with Buck on XM MLB this morning, he mentioned having 10 OF coming to ST, then corrected himself and said "it's 11 now" Could they have finally cleared Colvin's physical? Who are the OF expected in camp this spring? AJ,Nick, Lough, Peguero, Reimold, Pearce, Urrutia, Young, Berry, who else?

Paul is the 10th. But Colvin could still be the 11th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of those guys are on minor league contracts. Is it standard procedure to fly those guys into Baltimore and give them physicals? I don't know but I don't think so. I bet those guys are just given physicals when they report to ST.

Brach, De La Cruz, Escalona, Hendriks, Webb, Monell, Weeks, Lough and Peguero are all on major league contracts and the 40-man roster. Every one of them would have had to pass a physical to complete the trade or free agent contract. That's 9 new players on 40 man contracts. One that failed his physical and still hasn't signed. One that has issues that have yet to be resolved.

Failure to spend what it takes to win it all, not just 81+ games is a major failure by ownership. Due diligence and refusing to throw away money on injured players is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for the 2nd part, we still haven't seen everything. If no other moves are made, it certainly looks like a cost saving winter. Does anyone really know "spend what it takes to win it all" amounts to?

A good question. I'm not sure who on the market this winter - or last winter, for that matter - would have made that difference. Toronto spent a ton to win it all and failed miserably. So, simply spending money on the highest priced free agents is not the sure answer. Maybe DD is a genius and Gausman is the starter we're waiting for; maybe Peguero, Lough, Urrutia and Reimold can solve our problems in LF and at DH; maybe Aceves and Webb will bolster our bullpen someone here now will step seamlessly into the closer role. It's just a lot of maybe's and they haven't acquired anyone that you could look at the track record for that player and say, yeah, he's a plus major league player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to think we are going to hear an announcement that he's been signed soon or that another team has signed him about 2 weeks from now. It doesn't look like we are going to get any details about what's going on in between.
They have had plenty of time to come to a decision on his medicals. So unless they are holding the roster spot open for a possible SP signing sometime after Tanaka Friday, I think they have passed on him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a> agreed to terms with Colvin last week pending a physical, sources said. Could this be Grant Balfour redux?</p>— Jerry Crasnick (@jcrasnick) <a href="

">January 22, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>One source says Colvin has been hitting, throwing & working out 5 days a week in Arizona and hasn't had any problems. <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23orioles&src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Jerry Crasnick (@jcrasnick) <a href="

">January 22, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>From the "not this again'' department: Source says <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23orioles&src=hash">#orioles</a> are claiming there are issues with OF Tyler Colvin's physical.</p>— Jerry Crasnick (@jcrasnick) <a href="

">January 22, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah both Burnes and Hyde said after the game it's because Burnes is going on regular rest to start the first WC game and so he was shortened up a bit. 
    • You seem to pine for guys in AAA and then (with one notable exception) judge them very harshly if they don’t perform well instantly in the majors.  This is not the time to start experimenting with Young, and that’s no reflection on him at all IMO.
    • I agree with the part about Elias. He needs to operate with a little more humility (regarding his bullpen approach) and pivot in the offense regarding how he puts a pen together. He needs to get away from the arrogant thinking in believing that we are always "the smartest guys in the room" and can fix other teams junk/unwanted parts. That is fine to do some time (regardless of how much you spend). But you can't construct an entire pen made of castoffs and almost no guys with elite/power/strikeout stuff. Yes it worked great with Felix, Perez/Lopez in 22', Cano in 23'. But the problem is that we are in '24. And some of those lightening in the bottle guys have reverted back to what their talent says that they are - mediocre. We have a pen full of decent/league average/mediocre arms. That's not what you really want heading into October.
    • Also, since there’s another interesting discussion going on here, I think it’s time for Hyde to have an uncomfortable conversation with Adley. I hate everything I’m about to say, because Adley is my favorite Oriole. But we have to acknowledge where we are.  Over the last few months, the only sensible approach with Adley — other than the IL, which apparently he hasn’t been eligible for — has been to keep penciling him into the lineup almost everyday and hoping he figures it out. He has a track record of consistent lifelong excellence, so it’s felt like just a matter of time before he busts the slump and rights the ship.  But he hasn’t. Adley’s line over the last 3 months, almost half a season now, is so bad that it requires a double check to be sure it’s right: .186 / .274 / .278 / .552. A 61 wRC+. And -0.2 fWAR. He has been a below replacement player for 3 months now. He has been the 3rd-worst qualified hitter in baseball over that span, and the 7th-worst overall qualified player. The “qualified” part does make it a little misleading — most of the guys who’ve been this bad have long since been benched. I think you have to consider McCann, at least in Burnes’s starts. He’s been hitting a bit (114 wRC+ since the ASB), and even if he wasn’t on a bit of a heater, his normal baseline is still better than a .552 OPS. If you do continue to play him full-time, you just can’t treat him like he’s *Adley* anymore. You have to treat him like the bad backup catcher he’s been. He has to hit at the bottom of the order. The very bottom. There’s really no reasoned basis upon which you could want to have him get more ABs than guys like Mullins or Urias right now. And you have to PH for him liberally — whichever of Kjerstad/O’Hearn doesn’t start should be looking at Adley’s slot as their most likely opportunity.  As I said, I love Adley. It’s been brutal watching him. But there are 25 other guys on the team who deserve the best shot to win a ring. And that means you can’t just keep stubbornly handing all the ABs to a guy who is desperately lost, on the blind hope that he’ll suddenly find it. 
    • I didn’t post it in the game thread no, but I’m also not looking for credit. I thought it was a bad move at the time to remove Burnes in the first place, and choosing Cano at that point after he’d been bombed by those exact hitters, felt odd and off to me. The only real defense I could come up with was who if not Cano?  But taking Burnes out is essentially admitting that winning that night wasnt your top priority anyway, so why not also rest Cano, who you absolutely need in the playoffs and has pitched a lot?  I just didn’t get it in real time, and I still don’t. 
    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...