Jump to content

Price tag for Santana & Jimenez has come down to 14.1 -14.6 $mill per season for 3/4 year deals


xian4

Recommended Posts

I think even if that worked it would only benefit in the st. I'm guessing every other team would refuse to ever deal with the os again were they to do that.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why? Because the O's thought out of the box and they didn't? It would open the door for other teams to do the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply
And then there's the union. No way they let that happen.

Why not? Like I said, the contract could be negotiated so that the player would get his money. Everyone is happy, the O's get their pitcher and keep the pick, the player gets his money, the agent get his cut and the players union gets a new member and more union dues. Only one that wouldn't be happy is Bud Selig, and as far as I'm concerned, he can pound sand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Because the O's thought out of the box and they didn't? It would open the door for other teams to do the same thing.

Well I can't find the MLB source for the actual rule, but this appears to be an excerpt.

It would appear that signing a player to a minor league deal in order to avoid giving up the draft pick is explicitly forbidden.

If a Qualified Player signs a Major League contract with a new club after the MLB Rule 4 Draft, or if a Qualified Player signs a minor league contract with a new club and either remains in the minor leagues or is later added to the new club's MLB 40-man roster, the player's new club does NOT forfeit a Rule 4 Draft pick, and the player's former club does NOT receive Rule 4 Draft pick compensation. However, MLB clubs are not permitted to sign a Qualified Player to a minor league contract just to avoid losing a draft pick.

http://www.thecubreporter.com/book/export/html/3512

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>BREAKING: Ryan Dempster will not pitch for <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23RedSox&src=hash">#RedSox</a> in 2014 due to physical reasons and his desire to spend more time with his kids.</p>— Ken Rosenthal (@Ken_Rosenthal) <a href="

">February 16, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Another player?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be surprised if the Yankees' efforts to land Ervin Santana intensify in the coming weeks. Even after landing Masahiro Tanaka, the Bombers could use one more solid starter to round out their starting five.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/02/cafardo-on-cabrera-dodgers-santana-hardy.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

The O's go from landing a starting pitcher like Ervin possibly, to having the Yankees grab him and use him against the O's.

Would not sit well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Bump...interesting topic to revisit.     These two were considered pretty equivalent as of the 2013-14 offseason and both were late signs that winter.   Ubaldo signed for 4/$50 mm and has gone 27-33 with a 4.93 ERA.   Santana signed a one-year deal for $14.1 mm, then got a 4/$55 mm deal.   He's gone 34-28 with a 3.56 ERA and missed half of 2016 with a PED suspension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was and still am a Means defender.   Velocity is not John's game.   In 2019 his average 4 seamer was 91.7 mph.   But his changeup was 80.9 mph and his curve was 77 mph according to Statcast.  John went 12-11 with a 3.60 ERA that year.   Its the different in the speeds of the pitches that makes John effective. According to the information I found about a Texas pitcher in 2022 come off TJ surgery the O's can and I think probably will apply to MLB for another month of rehab in 10 day increments.   John's comeback story is far from over IMO.
    • Count me in I was there, see above post.
    • We stole two of the three games against KC when they came to Baltimore two weeks ago, and everybody knows it. My guess is they'll have a chip on their shoulder about that. They out-hit us and out-homered us in our own park, and an unlucky bounce here or there and we could have been swept. I know the Brewers blew us out two of three, but IMO the Royals are the best team we've face so far. I'm expecting to lose a couple in KC but wouldn't be surprised if we lost all three.  
    • Different times. The Champion 1894 Orioles averaged about 165-170 pounds a man, and Big Dan Brouthers weighed in at 207. At least according to bb-ref.
    • Copying and pasting from my phone which isn’t ideal.      Speed is the name of the game. Just as major-league teams are working on models that can help them make decisions faster, so do public analysts trying to help people beat the line, win that overall prize, or at least beat their college friends in that fantasy league. In the effort to make better decisions faster, we have a few statistics that can aid our efforts: • Fastball velocity stabilizes quickly — three starts should reliably predict the rest of the season. • Relatedly, Stuff+ becomes meaningful after as little as one start, at least when it comes to fastballs and sliders. • Strikeout-minus-walk rate is one of the most powerful small-sample tools.   —————-   Burnes:   Stuff+ told us before the season that Burnes had a great curveball that he could feature more, so it shouldn't be a surprise that he's done exactly that in Baltimore. He's also seen his fastball velocity return to 2022 levels. The result has been vintage Burnes, at a time when it seems like all the aces are falling around him. Long-term park factors are funky in Baltimore — with the new dimensions, Burnes should easily put up a low-threes ERA with plenty of strikeouts.   —————— G-Rod:   Like with this teammate Burnes, you can expect Rodriguez to beat this ERA projection. He now has two fastballs and two secondaries that are elite in terms of physical characteristics, so it's a full arsenal. Even using last year's data to improve the sample size, he's shown above-average command of four pitches, too. The only question mark is the fact that he lacks a slider. The cutter isn't great — overuse of that pitch early last season is what got him in trouble — and he hasn't consistently thrown a hard breaking ball. Otherwise, he's golden Grayson.        
    • I tried to do some @Just Regularkinda writing in the opener
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...