Jump to content

Yoon, Santana & Morales-Good Offseason?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

It's not like Santana and Jimenez are going to go unsigned this season, regardless that no team has signed them yet. Some GMs will come running - sooner than later, I'll bet.

But if we're still interested in either of them or Morales we're in a better situation than even yesterday. I think one signs with us and the other with Toronto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply
But if we're still interested in either of them or Morales we're in a better situation than even yesterday. I think one signs with us and the other with Toronto.

I am fine with that, slow news day.....any rumors/news in the Twittesphere on these two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not like Santana and Jimenez are going to go unsigned this season, regardless that no team has signed them yet. Some GMs will come running - sooner than later, I'll bet.

Kyle Lohse signed on March 25 last year. He pitched 198 innings for the Brewers with a 3.35 ERA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be fine with signing Santana to a 3-4 year deal. The guy is a workhorse. That's worth a pick. Just think if we would have addressed SP last offseason we wouldn't have to have dealt away a pick amongst other things for BUD NORRIS. It'd be worth it to sign Santana and Morales pick wise this year. Next year we could have three with our own, comp pick and jj hardy. Will we all feel better next year if we have three 215 1st round picks but only won 80-82 games? At some point teams have to make moves to "go for it". Remember the most perfect team ever traded for Matt Holliday with a ton of years and millions remaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kyle Lohse signed on March 25 last year. He pitched 198 innings for the Brewers with a 3.35 ERA.

If the O's could get Santana for close to the same 3/11 deal Lohse signed last year, they should be all over it. Lohse would have meant a big difference for this team last season (but would he have been worth giving up Hunter Harvey?).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the O's could get Santana for close to the same 3/11 deal Lohse signed last year, they should be all over it. Lohse would have meant a big difference for this team last season (but would he have been worth giving up Hunter Harvey?).

I really wanted Lohse last year. Harvey is nice but, at some point, it would be nice to have a complete MLB roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wanted Lohse last year. Harvey is nice but, at some point, it would be nice to have a complete MLB roster.

We got lucky to get Harvey where we did. Not the guy you typically get at 17 IMO. If we can get a piece to help this team get in the playoffs in the next 2-3 years the FO can't let fear of the draft pick keep them from doing it. The guy that's likely going to be there isn't going to be Harvey again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got lucky to get Harvey where we did. Not the guy you typically get at 17 IMO. If we can get a piece to help this team get in the playoffs in the next 2-3 years the FO can't let fear of the draft pick keep them from doing it. The guy that's likely going to be there isn't going to be Harvey again.

I agree. I'm on board with Santana and Morales and just punting the first two rounds this year (the sup pick is already gone but I do like Norris). Concentrate of finding talent in Rounds 3 and later, internationally, and keep the full lot of picks for 2015 (extend Hardy this year and CD in the offseason with Nick's outgoing money; Wieters can walk in two years). I feel like we'd have a roster capable of really competing this year and beyond and still have a nice set of prospects. It's just money (which is, unfortunately, like giving up organs to PA).

I mean, choose A or B:

A: Tillman/Santana/Chen/Gonzo/Norris --- Gausman/Bundy/EdRod/Harvey/Wright

B: Tillman/Chen/Gonzo/Norris/Gausman --- Bundy/EdRod/Harvey/Wright/1st Rd Pick

With a long term 2-6 lineup of: Machado-Davis-Jones-Morales-Hardy

With that lineup I'm fine if the other four spots are guys like Lough, Urrutia, Flaherty, Schoop, Young, etc.

That's not that expensive and when the pitching prospects are ready they start to replace some of the current starters, which could be traded or allowed to walk for more players/picks. Outside of likely extending Tillman, the rotation should remain good, cheap, and under long term control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got lucky to get Harvey where we did. Not the guy you typically get at 17 IMO. If we can get a piece to help this team get in the playoffs in the next 2-3 years the FO can't let fear of the draft pick keep them from doing it. The guy that's likely going to be there isn't going to be Harvey again.

I disagree. I think you could very well end up with a guy that starts a level higher than Harvey and is every bit the prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. I think you could very well end up with a guy that starts a level higher than Harvey and is every bit the prospect.

I guess I'm looking at how well he did once we got him...maybe clouding my view vs where he was projected pre draft.

I certainly defer to your judgement re prospects though.

I assume you're a NO on losing a pick then for Santana, Jimenez or or Morales?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'm looking at how well he did once we got him...maybe clouding my view vs where he was projected pre draft.

I certainly defer to your judgement re prospects though.

I assume you're a NO on losing a pick then for Santana, Jimenez or or Morales?

I could be sold on essentially punting the 2014 draft and signing all three. I think adding just one is sort of a waste.

This year just happens to have a good number of college arms, a number of which are likely to be available at pick 17. Also a lot of HS arms I'd easily put on par with Harvey as a HSer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Westburg exceeded rookie eligibility limits last year exceeding 130 at bats and more than 45 days on the active roster. On the plus side he might qualify as a super sophomore or at the very least avoid the sophomore slump. 
    • Westburg shouldn’t be, where are you seeing that?
    • So since Westburg is apparently still ROY eligible, Cowser and Westburg may project to be the best rookie combination since Fred Lynn and Jim Rice in 1975?  
    • There were several and I was one them. I'm  on record as saying I was one of his biggest Apologists . You should feel good about yourself as you were able to see that Means would be imploding before our very eyes( which was an opinion or a guess, which is what I did) as far as feeling bad for me? Dont I'm plenty good enough to know I wont be able to guess right every time 
    • Fantastic pickup by Elias and big kudos to O’Hearn for taking advantage of the resources to improve. He’s a great story. 
    • Given his injury history and what’s happening right now, Means may make more money as an Oriole next year than as a free agent. He may have to settle for league minimum as a FA but would do better than that in arbitration. Heck, unless he’s effective at least a little this year then the orioles might release him after the season to avoid paying more than league minimum. I hope Means recovers, very much so, but this scenario is possible imo.    ps. I guess I ignored the part where you said if Means thinks he is healthy. 
    • What I'd like to see in the next game Holliday plays, is for him to keep his eyes following through on the ball when he swings. In the last game I saw, he was yanking his head off the zone when he swung and couldn't see the bat to the ball. He was missing wildly and it wasn't even competitive. So, keep your eye on the ball! Follow all the way through! If your swing is so violent that it's yanking your head off the sight of the ball, then adjust your mechanics because you can't hit what you can't see!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...