Jump to content

CSN: The five worst contracts in Orioles history


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Albert Belle wasn't a bad signing. He gets a bad wrap for his personality, but given the insurance, his contract wasn't a problem. Until Tejada showed up, he was the only chance we had at an MVP player between 96 and 2004 (those years are guesses?).

For me, the worst was the BRob extension. I said at the time it was moronic, and it didn't take long for it to be proven. Some people thought it was good because he was a fan favorite, or maybe because we "owed" it to him because he was the lone bright spot on some bad teams, but those people are dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Jay Payton is a sensible one. $9.5M over 2 years to a 34-year-old corner OF on a theoretically rebuilding franchise. He produced 0.8 WAR total.

I thought Garrett Atkins was a reasonable guy to take a flyer on. $4M was too much, though. And he undeniably sucked.

I have trouble seeing Albert Belle's deal as that bad. He didn't have an extensive injury history, and the deal covered ages 32-36. There's always some risk associated with players over 30, but that's what insurance is for, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worst signing: Reggie. Worst trade, arguably, as well. The Orioles should have let him sit out the entire year instead of paying him, what was at that time, a king's ransom for part of a season.

After the (1976) season ended, both Jackson and Baylor signed long-term, free-agent contracts with the Yankees and the Angels, respectively. Jackson got $2.96 Million for 5 years from the Yankees, which made him the highest player in baseball history at the time.

In the end, we essentially replaced Don Baylor with Reggie Jackson for that one season. Baylor, like Jackson, had eyes on getting much more money than either Hank Peters or Charlie O. Finley would have been willing to dish out for 1977, so ultimately, Baylor for Jackson was essentially an even swap for players that had similar years in 1976.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, can't blame Belle or the Os for a degenerative condition. Also, not sure of the relevance of Belle denouncing a reporter to whether the contract was bad or not - seems like Dubroff is twisting the very knife he is critical of Belle for using.

I think the bad contracts that were DOA upon signing were Erickson, Ponson, Gibbons, Segui and the second Mora contract.

Now, the Os could have dealt Erickson at the deadline before his last season and Thrift wanted prospects instead of just dumping Erickson (per Peter Gammons) who got hurt again in his last year.

I've always hated the second Mora contract. AM should have let Mora go or trade him. Mora produced 12 WAR for a little over $10M in the three years of his prior contract, but then Mora went directly to the owner and was paid $23.5M to produce 4 WAR.

Jay Payton was never going to justify his contract as soon as it was signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This list of contracts that were bad for the Orioles only includes Albert Belle because he was an ass and because he did not play for so much of the contract. The O's insurance and his production when he was on the field do not in any way warrant this contract in the top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the (1976) season ended, both Jackson and Baylor signed long-term, free-agent contracts with the Yankees and the Angels, respectively. Jackson got $2.96 Million for 5 years from the Yankees, which made him the highest player in baseball history at the time.

In the end, we essentially replaced Don Baylor with Reggie Jackson for that one season. Baylor, like Jackson, had eyes on getting much more money than either Hank Peters or Charlie O. Finley would have been willing to dish out for 1977, so ultimately, Baylor for Jackson was essentially an even swap for players that had similar years in 1976.

Baylor CRIED when he was traded. He would have signed with the Orioles to stay in the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the (1976) season ended, both Jackson and Baylor signed long-term, free-agent contracts with the Yankees and the Angels, respectively. Jackson got $2.96 Million for 5 years from the Yankees, which made him the highest player in baseball history at the time.

In the end, we essentially replaced Don Baylor with Reggie Jackson for that one season. Baylor, like Jackson, had eyes on getting much more money than either Hank Peters or Charlie O. Finley would have been willing to dish out for 1977, so ultimately, Baylor for Jackson was essentially an even swap for players that had similar years in 1976.

Baylor CRIED when he was traded. He would have signed with the Orioles to stay in the organization.

As a completely unrestricted free agent, Baylor could have signed with any team in the majors in 1977, including the Orioles. He chose the Angels, who were offering (and gave him) considerably more money. If he was that upset over being an ex-Oriole, he could have have come back. He didn't. Those are the facts, and anything else is just speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who gives a EFF about 'surly' (Besides megalomaniacal sportswriters).

Some fans (like me, although not to the extent of CindylovesBrady) form emotional attachments to players on their teams. I don't want to being trying to like a player like Belle. I had less of a problem with Albert Pujols, but I didn't like the surly side of his nature either.

For you, Belle's attempt to run over pranksters in his Cleveland neighborhood may have been irrelevant. It wasn't for me. I disliked the signing at the time and I haven't changed my opinion. However, Belle's hip problems didn't make that worse; on the contrary, the engendered a certain amount of sympathy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we count hiring (and keeping) Syd Thrift as director of baseball operations?

Good deal. For as bad as Angelos was at that time, I truly don't think people comprehend how bad Thrift was and how much his decision making set this team back years. The 2000 fire sale practically torpedoed the franchise in and of itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good deal. For as bad as Angelos was at that time, I truly don't think people comprehend how bad Thrift was and how much his decision making set this team back years. The 2000 fire sale practically torpedoed the franchise in and of itself.

While Beane was inventing Moneyball Syd was calling teams to inquire about players they'd traded a year ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yes. That’s less than 25 million a season on average. Even though the years are a bit long. That’s the going rate for these type of superstar players.  Maybe you can go more AAV in exchange for say a 12 year deal? But at age 22, even at 14 years he’s here until he’s what 37/38? In 10 years 25 mill per won’t be the valued at nearly the same dollar amount in terms of “paying an older possibly declining player”. That contract length also ensures that he is an Oriole for life basically. If Rubenstien’s goal is to restore the franchise’s glory instead of simply making it a competitive franchise. You cannot minimize the value of having these type of franchise cornerstone players/homegrown superstars. We basically haven’t had one (and retained) since Ripken. (Yes I know Machado was one but we let him walk and basically the same with Mussina.)
    • I was looking at the O’s stat page and noticing how high all the OPS+ numbers are.  For example, Cedric Mullins has a .736 OPS but that’s good for a 116 OPS+ right now.  So, I looked around.  Right now, the MLB average OPS is .698.  That’s down from .734 last year, and (for those thinking of a “cold weather” explanation) from .726 last April.    The O’s, on the other hand, have a .780 OPS, compared to .742 last year.  That’s 3rd in MLB and good for an MLB-leading 130 OPS+, compared to 107 last year.    I’m not sure if the hot hitting will continue, but the team has had one heck of a start offensively, in a year where the league has been pretty cold.    
    • I didn’t see Angel Hernandez listed in any of the box scores from yesterday so he may have been the replay official. That would actually be hilarious. 
    • @Tony-OH   It’s early but is Forret possibly a better prospect than DeLeon?  A year younger.  Sounds like velo is similar.  Better control?
    • I wouldn’t hesitate to give him the Witt deal. I would like to get 3 FA years.  That’s my best case scenario and after that, the opt outs start.
    • At this point Gunnar is the most valuable asset in baseball right? I guess you could argue Witt Jr or De La Cruz. I sure as heck wouldn’t trade him for anybody.
    • @Tony-OHhave you had a chance to see or hear anything about Cam Weston yet? Is there real upside or is this an older guy who's maybe more advanced than his league?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...