Jump to content

Orioles, Rays and Mets all talking to Mariners about Nick Franklin


Greg

Recommended Posts

Don't want him.

I'd rather keep our pitching prospects and continue grooming schoop.

Is franklin really a can't miss/sure thing?

Because if there's any doubt, let's just stick with schoop and flaherty.

As others in this thread have said, he is basically about as good a prospect as Schoop; but he's about a half-season ahead on the experience/development curve. So, for the next 4 years would you rather see:

2B Flaherty/Schoop

SS Hardy

3B Machado

or

2B Franklin

SS Machado

3B Flaherty/Schoop

There are a lot of factors in that equation. Is Franklin better or worse defensively at 2B than Schoop? How good defensively is Manny at SS? How good is Schoop defensively at 3B? How much will Hardy decline at ages 31-34 and what will he cost? Will Franklin outhit Hardy as he matures and Hardy ages? If the O's sign Hardy will that prevent them from retaining other valued players?

I think the first alignment is highly likely to be better in 2014; after that, it's unclear. And of course, if Hardy is here for 2014 you'd keep Manny at 3B for the year, keep Schoop in the minors a bit longer to get more time at 3B and use Franklin/Flaherty at 2B this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I can't imagine DD giving up a top pitching prospect for a player

that plays a position where we are already relatively

deep. Probably only interested if they can get him

for some combination that includes players out of options

and lower level prospects, which of course means we won't

get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't want him.

I'd rather keep our pitching prospects and continue grooming schoop.

Is franklin really a can't miss/sure thing?

Because if there's any doubt, let's just stick with schoop and flaherty.

My question is this. If this were a true thing would the M's have spent what they did on Cano or would they have used that money in an area of greater need?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why give up ERod for someone like Schoop? Sorry, but

trade would make no sense to me. IMO

There does not appear to be a lot of difference between the value of ERod, Schoop and Franklin in the eyes of scouts.

Franklin: Ranked 79 by BA prior to 2013, 72 by BP, 47 by MLB.com

Schoop: Ranked 82 by BP prior to 2014, was ranked 82 by BA prior to 2012

ERod: Ranked 65 by BA prior to 2014, 61 by BP, 85 by MLB.com

I mean, ERod might be considered a smidge higher, but the difference isn't drastic. And Franklin is major league ready while ERod is at least a year away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My question is this. If this were a true thing would the M's have spent what they did on Cano or would they have used that money in an area of greater need?

Cano is a legit superstar, I don't think we should read too much into this. It's not as if this guy was a Manny Machado-level prospect within the M's system. I don't think he's can't miss or a sure thing. He's still a legit prospect (or was a legit prospect) with potential, though, but now he's blocked and he hasn't been amazing in his rookie season. Maybe that means we can get him for a bit less than we would have otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be ideal if we could get Franklin from the M's for a few guys who are out of options, something like a package of Britton and whoever loses the battle between Pearce, Young, Reimold and Peguero, but I think obtaining a top prospect for discarded scraps is unlikely.

Then again, we have a history of fleecing the Mariners when it comes to trades...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guess what's twice as good as having one high end infield prospect?

TWO high end infield prospects!

I do not know what to trade for him, but this is a great guy to get in the system if we match up trade wise.

I do not think trading for him has any immediate impact on Hardy. Weeks and Flaherty maybe and he gives Schoop some competition, but acquiring Franklin is a long term gain more then a 2014 gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be ideal if we could get Franklin from the M's for a few guys who are out of options, something like a package of Britton and whoever loses the battle between Pearce, Young, Reimold and Peguero, but I think obtaining a top prospect for discarded scraps is unlikely.

Then again, we have a history of fleecing the Mariners when it comes to trades...

Britton is a great starting point. He might be enough to keep EdRod. Who is next on a pitching prospect list? Berry?

Is Britton and Berry too much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EdRod has more upside than Franklin, Franklin is major league ready and likely has a much higher floor. They're roughly equivalent in overall trade value and it just depends on your taste for those qualities in prospects.

If we can get Franklin for anything less than EdRod I would be ecstatic. There's a chance we could, but I wouldn't count on it. The best prospect below the EdRod/Harvey tier is probably Wright, and he just went down with the dreaded elbow /forearm tendonitis that sounds like TJS in the making. I don't think we have the chips to get Franklin without parting with EdRod, unless the Mariners are really interested in Norris, Britton, or Matusz in addition with some lower level prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A month ago I would have traded Britton for a bag of peanuts, but after seeing him this spring, I would think very, very carefully before trading him.

I'd love for Britton to make the team but he doesn't have any options so trading him for something useful now may be smarter then losing him to waivers later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is a move for the future and to provide protection in case they can't or decide not to come to an agreement with Hardy on an extension, Franklin has at least one option remaining and could play 2B with Schoop at 3B in Norfolk. From what I've ready, Franklin is average at SS with the potential to be solid at 2B as well. Just has less experience there prior to last year. If we could do this for Britton or Matusz I'd be fine with it. The other lefty would be available for the pen with De La Cruz and eventually Patton, if they decide not to cut bait with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I know this isn’t the question that you asked, but my recollection is that you worked on the business side for the Orioles at some point, so I think you might be able to weigh in on this idea: do you think there are business reasons to extend a Gunnar or an Adley? I know you’re view is generally that extensions are overrated by the fanbase, but that largely seems related to the idea that you are paying for past-peak years (if I’m off base here, it wasn’t intentional—just my recollection). I tend to think that from a business standpoint, an extension for a young player would not make a material difference concerning the amount of tickets sold, revenue generated, etc. and would really just make some people on X happy, but I don’t really have anything to support that opinion.
    • The way he is pitching that's like throwing gas on a fire.
    • I don't think Elias will seriously entertain bringing back Santander.
    • Left the game with 1 run in and 2 on ,2 outs in the 6th and Akin gave up both runs. Bad luck tonight in my opinion but I'm sure there are many on here will say he sucks and should be replaced. 
    • Yeah, we're kind of getting off track here since this is a Jackson Holliday thread, but I will say I don't see how Mountcastle gets traded -- and even if he did it would be to unblock Mayo and not Kjerstad.  Both Mounty and Mayo are righties, and it doesn't look like Mayo will play third base anytime soon.  I think two of the prospects need to get traded -- maybe in the offseason or next season -- unless Hays, O'Hearn or Mounty are dealt.  I think there's a chance the O's bring back Santander, but that's a big wildcard too.
    • I was in favor of trading one of Mountcastle/Hays/Santander after last year to make room for prospects like Kjerstad. I see the main issue with trading one of the above or O'Hearn is those players will deliver more value in an Orioles uniform over the return in any trade. I'm leaning towards Elias taking a calculated risk and creating at bats for Kjerstad.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...