Jump to content

Jarrod Parker needs Tommy John surgery again.


Greg

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Jarrod Parker needs Tommy John surgery again.</p>— Susan Slusser (@susanslusser) <a href="

">March 17, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have some guys been overconfident in the surgery/results, then overdo it, necessitating a second surgery?

It could have to do with the overall increase in velocity the past few years.

Or maybe it is the lack of steroids and HGH.

There was a report on that very topic at last years SABR conference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have some guys been overconfident in the surgery/results, then overdo it, necessitating a second surgery?

Like Frobby said, i think that overuse probably plays a part in some way. This is one of the reasons that I agreed with the Nationals decision to limit

Strasburg's innings after his surgery acoule of years ago.. IMO, the other reason we see repeat surgeries is that most of these pitchers use the same mechanics after the initial surgery. If they are throwing 93-97 mph with touchy mechanics before the first surgery, they are most like going to use the same mechanics afterwards so that they can throw as hard if not harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like Frobby said, i think that overuse probably plays a part in some way. This is one of the reasons that I agreed with the Nationals decision to limit

Strasburg's innings after his surgery acoule of years ago.. IMO, the other reason we see repeat surgeries is that most of these pitchers use the same mechanics after the initial surgery. If they are throwing 93-97 mph with touchy mechanics before the first surgery, they are most like going to use the same mechanics afterwards so that they can throw as hard if not harder.

Which is extra short sighted when you think that while recovering from TJ is the best time to rebuild someone's delivery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is extra short sighted when you think that while recovering from TJ is the best time to rebuild someone's delivery.

I agree, but the problem is that if you rebuilt the mechanics, these guys may not come back throwing as hard. Further, it's eaiser to tweak someone's delivery rather than rebuild their delivery because of the muscle memory that is involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if economics plays a factor? Just get them through the six years of team control then who cares if the elbow blows out again? The problem is, they are not even making it through the six years.

I think that it is most likely is a factor as well.

If you get them through the six years any surgery that they may have to have may very well be another team's issue.

Several young pitchers are having issues early in their MLB careers. I'm sure that pitches thrown at the high school, college, and upper level summer leagues plays a big factor as well. The TJ surgery being almost routine is a double edged sword IMO. It's good that these guys ussually miss a season and are able to come back in pretty much peak form. It's bad that the surgery is a cure all to the underlying problems of poor mechanics, overuse, and economics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that it is most likely is a factor as well.

If you get them through the six years any surgery that they may have to have may very well be another team's issue.

Several young pitchers are having issues early in their MLB careers. I'm sure that pitches thrown at the high school, college, and upper level summer leagues plays a big factor as well. The TJ surgery being almost routine is a double edged sword IMO. It's good that these guys ussually miss a season and are able to come back in pretty much peak form. It's bad that the surgery is a cure all to the underlying problems of poor mechanics, overuse, and economics.

And the odds of a full recovery from a second surgery are no where near as good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the odds of a full recovery from a second surgery are no where near as good.

I think that this is where the economics comes into it CoC.

In the Orioles case, I'm sure the hope is that Bundy can recover and give the team at least six years of service time.

if he has to have surgery again in three or four years, that's another year of recovery and another year that he is unavailable.

In this scenario, if he is able to come back after the second surgery, he may likely leave as a free agent and benefit another club if he is able to come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that this is where the economics comes into it CoC.

In the Orioles case, I'm sure the hope is that Bundy can recover and give the team at least six years of service time.

if he has to have surgery again in three or four years, that's another year of recovery and another year that he is unavailable.

In this scenario, if he is able to come back after the second surgery, he may likely leave as a free agent and benefit another club if he is able to come back.

At least the O's only lost an option year with Bundy, not a year of team control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the need for 2nd surgery is because how long these guys are when they get the surgery.

When this first surgery came on the scene, guys were lucky to think about having six years left in the tank, after 18 months of rehab after the surgery.

Now, the guys are so much younger.

This isn't fact that I seen printed somewhere, just something I was thinking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Works for me,  as long as the first piece is a Norby type!  Only one of Ortiz/Westburg/Cowser/Kjerstad should be traded for Cease.  Let them pick one of them and a couple in the 8-15 range then a lottery pick or two if needed.  But giving up 2 of those is to pricy for the return.  I like Cease, but personally value him as a very solid #3 starter.  Sure, he COULD perform better than that,  but I wouldn't bet on it.  Maybe he reverts back to his 2022 form, but I think it more likely that what we get is what we saw from him in 2023, with an improvement in numbers due to the defense behind him. 
    • Exited about this kid and the future of our international signings. We have to remember the initial reporting don’t mean a whole lot. We’ve had success in the 100-500 k range too.
    • Downtown restaurants should like this too.  Much better for any local entertainment venues.
    • Cease is a solid MLB starting pitcher with 2 years of control  who's team has clearly made it known that he's available.  Of course there is a lot of interest.  There is a lot of interest in the Orioles' prospects, as well.  Fans of both teams are hopeful that their team will get maximum value for their assets in any trade.  I'm sure that it is sometimes difficult for GMs to reach a meeting of the minds on a player's value, in which case they need to work out a restructure of the discussed deal that may not include that player.  I think Elias' opinion on Ortiz is likely to be pretty close to what posters on this site are telling you.  If the White Sox GM views Ortiz as you do, it would seem that a deal between the two teams would most likely not have Ortiz included.  I'm sure that isn't all that unusual and the GMs just turn the page and look at working out a trade involving other players/prospects.  What confuses me is that you seem to rate Ortiz lower than we do and lower than the various sites rate him, but would like a trade of Cease for Cowser and Ortiz.  I'm against that deal because I think 2 prospects rated that highly would be an overpay.  It seems to me, you agree.  You simply rate Ortiz lower.  Seems to me that the answer in such an impasse that would make both parties happy would be to replace Ortiz with another prospect that is lower rated than Ortiz -- which would be of equal value in your mind, since you rate Ortiz lower and still think the proposed trade is a fair one.  Make sense?  Maybe replace Ortiz with Norby.
    • I would definitely do Westburg  and Cowser.
    • 100% agree with you.  Especially when you haves waves of prospects coming up behind these guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...