MrOrange82 Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 Then why get him up then? Get him up to start the 9th, or if O'Day allows a baserunner. It was 37 degrees. Getting him up after O'Day allowed a baserunner might not have been enough time, in Buck's estimation. But who knows...you and CoC are mind-reading every bit as much as I am. It makes sense to me that, in extremely cold weather, you give Hunter a long, long time to warm up, and Buck would have had Hunter ready with a three run lead if O'Day got in trouble for the 9th. Buck had Matusz warming up well in advance of the time he actually came into the game. But again, mind-reading. This isn't an argument that can be "won." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrange82 Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 I politely disagree. Buck is a pretty fervent follower of the save rule. I thought Buck favored the "win" rule? Maybe it's just one of those "Coke means soda in Georgia" kind of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 I thought Buck favored the "win" rule? Maybe it's just one of those "Coke means soda in Georgia" kind of things. Quoting Buck believing in the "win rule" has been a running joke around here since about two weeks after he made the statement. My guess is he wanted to shake things up since he had just arrived. His actions since then have proven many times over that he very much cares about the save rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waroriole Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 It was 37 degrees. Getting him up after O'Day allowed a baserunner might not have been enough time, in Buck's estimation. But who knows...you and CoC are mind-reading every bit as much as I am. It makes sense to me that, in extremely cold weather, you give Hunter a long, long time to warm up, and Buck would have had Hunter ready with a three run lead if O'Day got in trouble for the 9th. Buck had Matusz warming up well in advance of the time he actually came into the game. But again, mind-reading. This isn't an argument that can be "won." If it takes so long to get ready in the cold, why sit Hunter down when the lead becomes 4? It's not mind reading. It's looking at how Buck has managed his closer previously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrange82 Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 Quoting Buck believing in the "win rule" has been a running joke around here since about two weeks after he made the statement.My guess is he wanted to shake things up since he had just arrived. His actions since then have proven many times over that he very much cares about the save rule. (I was kidding...hence the "maybe the win rule = the save rule in Buck's mind" joke) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 If it takes so long to get ready in the cold, why sit Hunter down when the lead becomes 4?It's not mind reading. It's looking at how Buck has managed Jim Johnson previously. I do think it may be different with Tommy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waroriole Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 I do think it may be different with Tommy. I haven't seen any indication that it will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrange82 Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 If it takes so long to get ready in the cold, why sit Hunter down when the lead becomes 4?It's not mind reading. It's looking at how Buck has managed his closer previously. Because O'Day's leash gets longer with a four run lead? I mean...I really don't see how that's unreasonable. If O'Day has a wider margin for error, and you've already had Hunter up/moving around, there's no need to have Hunter continue throwing nonstop if O'Day's been given another run to work with. But at least Hunter hasn't been sitting idle for three hours in near-freezing temperatures at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waroriole Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 Because O'Day's leash gets longer with a four run lead? I mean...I really don't see how that's unreasonable. If O'Day has a wider margin for error, and you've already had Hunter up/moving around, there's no need to have Hunter continue throwing nonstop if O'Day's been given another run to work with. But at least Hunter hasn't been sitting idle for three hours in near-freezing temperatures at that point. Weird how that leash coincides exactly with the save rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 I do think it may be different with Tommy. It wasn't different with Gregg until he proved he couldn't get the job done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOrange82 Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 Weird how that leash coincides exactly with the save rule. Or maybe Buck is so beholden to the save rule that he realized with a four run lead...only O'Day was eligible for a save under those circumstances. Buck needed his save fix, and Darren gave it to him. This conspiracy's going all the way to the top... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 I haven't seen any indication that it will be. You think Tommy would be out their the fourth day after blowing three in a row? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 It wasn't different with Gregg until he proved he couldn't get the job done. I think for a closer, the definition of effectiveness is getting the job done. Tommy is the closer for the Orioles. Not a relief ace, or some nouveau match-up relief king. In the traditional sense that all successful baseball teams have. No experiments here. If he does not get the job done, I am certain Buck will get a different closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weams Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 Or maybe Buck is so beholden to the save rule that he realized with a four run lead...only O'Day was eligible for a save under those circumstances. Buck needed his save fix, and Darren gave it to him. This conspiracy's going all the way to the top... As someone said before, the players like Buck because he looks out for them. When it is not counterproductive to the Orioles over the long haul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted April 19, 2014 Share Posted April 19, 2014 I think for a closer, the definition of effectiveness is getting the job done. Tommy is the closer for the Orioles. Not a relief ace, or some nouveau match-up relief king. In the traditional sense that all successful baseball teams have. No experiments here. If he does not get the job done, I am certain Buck will get a different closer. And then that guy will get all the benefits of being a "closer" until he fails. BTW the A's don't currently have a closer and they seem to be doing OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.