Jump to content

Is It Too Early to Start Talking About Nick Markakis?


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Inspired by the Wieters thread... Nick is hitting to all fields, drawing walks. His bat just looks much quicker than last year. He struggled a bit to start the season but is now up to .305/.366/.406. Since April 15, he is hitting .352/.446/.493 (that OBP is astounding even for a relatively small sample!). I don't want to focus too much on the hit streak for fear of jinxing it, but what I really like about this year so far even more is that he does not have back to back 0-for games. The OBP is just what we need for our leadoff guy.

Obviously the SLG number leaves something to be desired, but whenever he comes up in a big situation I just feel a base hit coming when last year I would have expected a groundout, and he did hit a couple of HR in the Pittsburgh series. Defense is still solid but not spectacular.

Overall his numbers look very similar to his 2010-2011 years, with less power than his peak years but plus average and OBP. Baseball Reference has him at 0.3 WAR over the first 1/4 season vs -0.3 for all of last year. On this board we were hoping going into the season that some bounce-back from Nick and Wieters would offset regression by Chris Davis. This appears to have happened at least partially (depending on what CD does when he comes back).

With Urrutia struggling in the minors, is it crazy to think that we might actually pick up Nick's $17 million option next year? Going into the season I was hoping for a decent bounce-back year and then let him walk, but now it doesn't seem so crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Overall his numbers look very similar to his 2010-2011 years, with less power than his peak years but plus average and OBP. Baseball Reference has him at 0.3 WAR over the first 1/4 season vs -0.3 for all of last year.

It's actually closer to 1/5 of the season, meaning he's on pace for a 1.5 WAR season, and if we're going strictly off that I don't think it's worth 17 million. But it doesn't/shouldn't go strictly off WAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No team in baseball would pay Nick Markakis 17 million next year. The Orioles won't either. He's hitting like he did when he went to the leadoff spot in 2012. Let's see him do it for a full season. If he does, the O's will probably offer him a 5/50 type of deal. If he wants to be a career Oriole, he'll take it. First, he has to earn it.

The O's could come close if they buy him out, give him a QO and have him accept it.

That is the only way I can see it happening.

His glove doesn't play well in the OF anymore and his bat doesn't play at first or DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how players turn it on in a contract year, no?

He's not getting 17 million next year. No way, no how.

I'm a fan and I'm glad that he's having a good year so far. The lead-off spot does seem to suit him. He's a solid player and a good teammate. Go Nick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's too early to worry about it. I'm relatively sure the O's won't pick up the option, but they might offer him a multi-year deal at a significantly lower salary than he is making now. My guess is they will review the situation at the all-star break, by which time Nick's OPS could be .840, .700, or somewhere in between like it is right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A deep dive on Nicky's stats doesn't help much in the fluke/breakout debate. His BABIP is up a bit, but not an absurd amount of his career average. He has improved his plate discipline a bit so far this season. Specifically, his Z-contact% is at a career best 96.7%. Here's hoping he keeps putting the good ones in play!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's average at best in RF and I know the stats hate him. However, I still don't feel is a liability out there. He catches everything he gets too and makes some nice catches going back to the wall.

If he is average at best now then how is he going to look from 2015-2019?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the interview the other day on MLBN. Duquette pretty much poo pooed any possible extensions with Hardy/Wieters/Davis but did hint at QO'ing Cruz as a de-facto extension. No mention if Nick though. If Nick ends up healthy and having a good year I might not mind the 1 year option and/or QO as much as some others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think they will decline his option and try to negotiate a team friendly extension. My guess is Nick would be more interested in years than AAV. If that fails then I think they will make the QO. Why not? They get Nick for one more year or they get a pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think they will decline his option and try to negotiate a team friendly extension. My guess is Nick would be more interested in years than AAV. If that fails then I think they will make the QO. Why not? They get Nick for one more year or they get a pick.

This is what I'm thinking. Plus we'd have more leverage on an extension with the QO hanging on him. Not that I'd necessarily want to extend him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To bad UZR stopped posting splits. I can't imagine anyone playing the strange RF at OPACY any better than Nick. Who ever replaces him may well play a lot better on the road, but OPACY is tricky and made for Nick's skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • As the Joker said, wait till they get a load of me.
    • Worst trade in Os history?       Joking of course.  I know we gave up little and got a lottery ticket that might pop.  Still it was a terrible outing, and he should be on the bus to Norfolk if possible. 
    • I’ll always remember that Portland team that didn’t really have any stars besides Walton but played so great as a team and beat the Sixers for the NBA title. I always enjoyed his commentary as a broadcaster.
    • He was distressed that he was buried in AAA and wasn’t mentally locked in like he should have been.  Maybe he was anxious.  Maybe he was distressed.  Maybe he just didn’t feel appreciated and wondered if it all was worth it. Once he got to the majors he got a new attitude.  I have no idea if this is true, but players are human and their emotions affect their abilities.  Admittedly, we have never heard anything from Stowers but Norby has been quite clear about his situation feeling hopeless.  I don’t know why it would be a stretch for you to believe that would affect performance.  These guys are not automatons. 
    • It’s a good question. He might sign in the 2025 pool. Players can be posted from Nov 1 to Dec 15, after which there is a 45-day posting window.  Chiba gets 25% of bonus as posting fee.  It’s believed that Sasaki has a contractual provision that allows him to get posted this year, though Chiba likely controls the date he is posted.  The current international signing period ends Dec 15 and the next one starts Jan 15.  Thus it would make sense for him to be posted either Nov 1 (for this year’s signing period) or Dec 15 (for next year’s signing period).   It would be logical to wait for next year’s signing period when more unused bonus pool will be available.  The one wrinkle there is that much of next year’s pool will have been verbally committed to top prospects - not to say a team wouldn’t renege on their commitments to sign Sasaki. Additionally, the Dodger’s only have $5 million next year and might be able to increase their pool in the current period to close to that with trades. The biggest reason why I think he might sign this period is that I don’t think the Dodger’s would have saved $3 million if they didn’t think there was a good chance that he would sign in the current period.
    • I hear where you're coming from (partly tongue in cheek) but I do think Stowers is different in the fan mind than his peers in the Norfolk pipeline--being older and already having multiple chances to prove himself or not. That said, his longtime supporters will be clamoring for what you describe, while his longtime skeptics (myself included) will keep being skeptical.  Today, we're all happy for him!
    • I'm not even sure what hyperbole is, but Stowers is leading the team in batting average at .375 😉 Lets see what he has now. Everyday, vs righties and lefties.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...