Jump to content

Tommy Hunter AGAIN!


isestrex

Recommended Posts

Hunter bailed out again. Of course, he did force the team to burn two extra relief arms and sit through a 55 minute rain delay.

But I'm sure that won't impact tomorrow's game.

#saverule

Eh, Houston had to throw more innings too.

Still undefeated when Tommy Boy pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Buck and Hunter lucked out again. Anyone noticing the comments coming from the pitchers and media people commenting about Clevenger and Joseph catching behind the plate? If DD is convinced he can't sign Wieters as he has alluded to is before the All-Star break and trade deadline the time to move him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hunter bailed out again. Of course, he did force the team to burn two extra relief arms and sit through a 55 minute rain delay.

But I'm sure that won't impact tomorrow's game.

#saverule

It isn't about tomorrow's game, it's about the next two series with no off day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't watch tonight's game. All I can say was his k/9 was 13.50, gb% was 50%, BABIP was .750, and FIP and xFIP were both 0.08 (!!!!). His FIP is now 3.08 and xFIP is 3.34. His BABIP is .422. I know it is hard to see, very hard right now, but Hunter could be very successful, and according to all of his peripheals, should be right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck is amazing. "We have to do a better job of not creating so many save situations." Drives me crazy. Save situations mean you're at least winning. You just don't have to use the same guy every freaking time. Especially when he's not the best option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck is amazing. "We have to do a better job of not creating so many save situations." Drives me crazy. Save situations mean you're at least winning. You just don't have to use the same guy every freaking time. Especially when he's not the best option.

I don't disagree with him, and I don't think anybody fundamentally would disagree with him on that statement. The last two years we've had far too many save opportunities, and I'm sure it was partly to take the heat off Tommy. But, there's no getting around the fact he has been shaky and flirting with disaster almost every outing. About the best thing you can say is tonight he got the leadoff batter out, and through all of this he doesn't look like he's lost his confidence. Buck is right that we need not create so many save situations, but it doesn't excuse Hunter's struggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't watch tonight's game. All I can say was his k/9 was 13.50, gb% was 50%, BABIP was .750, and FIP and xFIP were both 0.08 (!!!!). His FIP is now 3.08 and xFIP is 3.34. His BABIP is .422. I know it is hard to see, very hard right now, but Hunter could be very successful, and according to all of his peripheals, should be right now.

He's getting clobbered. BABIP has no bearing when he's getting crushed. Last 5 appearances:

May 2nd: 1 IP, 1 H, 2 SO, 26 pitches thrown

May 6th: 1 IP, 1 H, 2 BB, 1 SO, 22 pitches thrown

May 7th: 1 IP, 3 H, 1 SO, 21 pitches thrown

May 9th: 1 IP, 1 H, 1 BB, 1 SO, 13 pitches thrown

May 10th: 2/3 IP, 3 H, 1 SO, 23 pitches thrown

Altogether? That's 4 2/3 IP, 9 H, 3 BB, 6 SO, 105 pitches. Those numbers translate to:

17.4 H/9

5.8 BB/9

2.575 WHIP

11.6 SO/9

21 pitches per game

Outside of the strikeouts, those are all very alarming. A lot of baserunners. A lot of pitches thrown. And if it wasn't for some poor baserunning and some luck, his numbers would actually be a lot worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't watch tonight's game. All I can say was his k/9 was 13.50, gb% was 50%, BABIP was .750, and FIP and xFIP were both 0.08 (!!!!). His FIP is now 3.08 and xFIP is 3.34. His BABIP is .422. I know it is hard to see, very hard right now, but Hunter could be very successful, and according to all of his peripheals, should be right now.

Can't edit. Just wanted to add that his LD% is 29% which is very high. But a .422 BABIP is absurd. Bottom line, I think he can be a good closer, but I wouldn't be upset if we tried Britton or O'Day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's getting clobbered. BABIP has no bearing when he's getting crushed. Last 5 appearances:

May 2nd: 1 IP, 1 H, 2 SO, 26 pitches thrown

May 6th: 1 IP, 1 H, 2 BB, 1 SO, 22 pitches thrown

May 7th: 1 IP, 3 H, 1 SO, 21 pitches thrown

May 9th: 1 IP, 1 H, 1 BB, 1 SO, 13 pitches thrown

May 10th: 2/3 IP, 3 H, 1 SO, 23 pitches thrown

Altogether? That's 4 2/3 IP, 9 H, 3 BB, 6 SO, 105 pitches. Those numbers translate to:

17.4 H/9

5.8 BB/9

2.575 WHIP

11.6 SO/9

21 pitches per game

Outside of the strikeouts, those are all very alarming. A lot of baserunners. A lot of pitches thrown. And if it wasn't for some poor baserunning and some luck, his numbers would actually be a lot worse.

So he's gotten 14 outs in that time span, 6 by strike out, and you are calling him lucky? That's a BABIP of well over .500. And he's lucky? How many guys strike out 12 per 9 innings and give up that many hits? They don't.

He hasn't been great but he hasn't been this bad. He has been extremely unlucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he's gotten 14 outs in that time span, 6 by strike out, and you are calling him lucky? That's a BABIP of well over .500. And he's lucky? How many guys strike out 12 per 9 innings and give up that many hits? They don't.

He hasn't been great but he hasn't been this bad. He has been extremely unlucky.

His swinging strike rate has been terrible. His k rate is insane for a guy who doesn't miss bats. If he's been unlucky in some areas, he's been just as lucky in others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Hunter: "They are hitting fastballs, they are hitting curveballs, they are hitting everything I throw right now. So, it?s not just 1 pitch..</p>— Brittany Ghiroli (@Britt_Ghiroli) <a href="

">May 11, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck basically said Hunter needs to improve. That's promising. At least he isn't wearing the JJ blinders, maybe he learned from last year.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He might have said something similar about JJ last year. Maybe not, because JJ was a veteran with hundreds of saves for the O's, but the more important thing is that Buck himself needs to improve his management the team's closer and overall bullpen.

I hate how he uses that phrase "I believe in the win rule." He's completely going against the implications of that statement by acting solely in response to the save rule. He's suggesting that all that matters is getting a win, and that a win is more important than getting a save, but his actions fly in the face of that; all he's doing in using one pitcher to get almost every single save.

Buck very rarely uses his closers/late relievers in ways that will maximize his chances of getting a win when his closer is struggling. Unless his closer has pitched 3 days in a row, he uses the same guy every time a save situation comes up, regardless of how his closer has been pitching, regardless of how overused that closer might be, and regardless of game conditions. Tonight, Britton should have kept pitching until he allowed a baserunner in the ninth, at the very least.

Buck is too loyal to his players and he's a slave to the save rule. He pigeonholes whoever his closer is and fails to adapt to how his relievers have been performing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • There’s a good chance McCann starts game one with Burnes. Big roster. We can always move Adley from DH to C late in the game. Lose the DH, but have a big enough bench to just pinch hit and double switch to hide the pitcher’s spot coming up.  So really we’d only be sacrificing 2 ABs from O’Hearn/Mounty/Kjerstad but we get Burnes throwing to his boy every pitch. 
    • We would have lost last night regardless due to zero runs scored by the offense. It is worrisome that Cano looked awful in back to back games. After talk about arm soreness. He has been the one reliable guy. Once we fell behind I don't really care how bad Bowman and Baker are. Hopefully they don't even make the roster for the playoffs. 
    • Don’t sleep on Povich getting a chance to eliminate the team that traded him away. That kind of stuff matters. The little extra…
    • I do worry about the McCann start although he has been hitting lately, so maybe you can justify it.
    • It’s the 7th inning with Burnes or Eflin on the bump. A tough lefty is coming up. Who you bringing in?  Perez or Coloumbe?  
    • My thoughts: - I agree that the Achilles heel is the bullpen and not the offense (especially with Westburg, Mountcastle, Urias, and Kjerstad back). - I also agree that Perez is overused in high leverage situations. This is going to come down to the degree you expect his “clutch” performance to be predictive going forward.  - I second the notion that most good bullpens are built with some degree of dumpster diving.  If you go back to offseason threads, there were not many desired bullpen FA targets (outside of unrealistic ones like Hader) that would have worked out well.  Maybe we haven’t “dumpster dived” well enough as evidenced by the success of Kaleb Ort in Houston. - Jacob Webb hasn’t been sharp since returning from the IL and Bowman has looked shaky his last few times out. - We don’t have a true closer, only a group of mostly effective set-up men in Dominguez, Cano, and Coulombe. - Part of me wishes they would be more aggressive with G-Rod and the Mountain. While we expect the team to continue to contend, you never really know how many times you’ll be back in the playoffs. However, I know in my head they are probably making the right decision. - I also feel like they should be auditioning McDermot, Selby, Young, or Strowd (who has been very good since August after rough Norfolk start). They could option Baker who I think is unlikely to have a path to trusted status after last year’s ALDS performance. This feeling may be mostly driven by dissatisfaction with the current state and wanting something better.  It might be unrealistic to expect options unproven at the MLB level to suddenly step in and be key playoff pieces.
    • Oh if we’re talking about what they will do, I can see it being something stupid like McCann at C and Adley at DH. I do think Mullins has enough veteranosity to outweigh Hyde’s obsession with L/R matchups. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...