Jump to content

Curious to see how much time 53 homers buys


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

Ugh, that last statement isn't fun to read. It's sad to think about players approaching the game with a personal agenda and money being the driving force but it's all too common in this era of the game. I don't endorse Davis becoming a small ball player but there are times where they are basically giving him first base with that shift. I feel like to keep a team on their toes you've got to do the unexpected. It will result in much more dynamic player...right now we've got CD the strike out king, he can hit it out but he probably won't.

Works for some guys. Nelson Cruz is very much on a mission this year, after getting spurned by just about everyone during the offseason. Had to take a one-year deal in hopes of proving himself... and he's certainly seemed quite motivated to do so, thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Watching his AB it looks to me he is being pitched low and away, down and in, and up and in. Hard to hit a lot of FB that way.

He missed some FBs over the plate yesterday...but they were upper 90's. I wasn't overly concerned with Davis before seeing some of the stats in this thread. Now I'm even more optimistic that he'll rebound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to give OH'ers a lot of credit for their continued patience on Davis. The old oblique routine doesn't fly too well with me. He is taking some mighty swings and misses without any note of discomfort. His head is flying out and at the present shows zero signs of being near what he was for the first half of last year. For all the love he gets for his OBP he is still a major disappointment. Pitchers are still pitching around him for no apparent reason. When they don't fear him anymore let's see what happens to his OBP. But if people are content with a first baseman, on pace for less that 10 HR's so be it. I hope he turns it around and I'll be patient, but skeptical at the same time.

I co-sign this post. 100% spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been back from the DL one week. I'd give him a bit longer since he did hit 53 HR last year.

The DL excuse is pretty weak. He wasn't on it that long and it wasn't like he was killing the ball prior to the oblique issue. He did however have a rocket HR on Saturday. He is certainly worth being patient with. My problem is that the O's had a very good record when he was on the DL, and since he is back, not so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis isn't the only one. Manny hasn't done much of anything since he got back either. Sort of disheartening to see the big hitters struggle like they are. The way Nick has been hitting, if Manny and Davis could do a little of what they did last year, this team would be scoring some runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Certainly hard to sit O'Hearn with the way he's been hitting against righties. But Kjerstad doesn't have major split issues so he may be able to take some of those lefty PAs.
    • This team is good enough to win with Holliday, Norby, or Urias at 2B. I think the thought of staying with Holliday is that he has the highest ceiling by far of the 3. And if you can get him going so that by the end of the season he is ready for "take off", he gives you that one additional weapon that Norby nor Urias are. IMO, there are several issues with turning to Norby to replace Holliday now.  1) He has no long term place on this team. So you are in effect starting his Major League clock unnecessarily, when he most likely has more value to another org if he stays at AAA and can start his MLB clock on their choosing. 2) What if he struggles? Then what? Do you turn back to Holliday? If he struggles, it may damage his trade value. 3) What if Holliday regains his stroke at AAA? What do you do then even if Norby has managed to do a decent job or even a good job? Do you keep Holliday for the rest of the year? 4) And to me this is the biggest - What is the best use of his value? To be a bench player here long term? Or to be part of a trade that brings the Major League team something that it needs (in the pitching department)?
    • Agree with you that Mayo is special, and that if I were going to be on one of our players being an impact, middle of the order bat, it's him (though if Cowser and Westburg continue to hit anything like this we'll have a few of them! And I'm a big believer in Kjerstad's bat too). I don't think it's really that complicated, though, no? Santander will leave next season and Kjerstad takes that place. Trade Mountcastle and that's Mayo's spot. Basallo is still a ways off and things will probably work themselves out with injury or what not by then. Norby, Stowers, and Ortiz were always going to be the three that it was going to really be a struggle to find a spot for, and the Ortiz trade solved the Ortiz issue, and now I think you're in a situation where, barring injury, Stowers probably ought to be trade bait and Norby could become a really valuable 12th hitter off the bench next season. 
    • I'm pretty much in agreement with SG on this one. I don't know if he should be sent down, but as SG said, “That's where I trust Elias.” I disagree a little bit on the “hurting his confidence” issue. I think hitting a baseball successfully is a lot like hitting a golf ball successfully… a lot of what impacts your success is what you have going on between your ears. While there's a danger in hurting his confidence by sending him out there every day while he's in a sustained slump, there's also a danger in sending him down to Norfolk. But, once again, I have to trust Elias and management on making that call. 
    • I was dead wrong on this -- i thought for sure it would be McKenna. Kjerstad is obviously deserving of it and happy for the kid. If Hyde is gonna try and get him in the line up regularly its gonna come at the expense of someone else. Who is that? Maybe Mountcastle's knee is worse than they are telling us. Either way, what happens when Hays gets healthy? I'm sure they are operating on the "things always work themselves out" theory. Long term, this org really needs to develop or trade for a power hitting RH bat that plays the OF/1B. Looking forward to see how this works out.
    • Yeah, I agree. It makes sense for them to do now while Hays is injured and they can figure it out, especially since Mountcastle is dealing with his knee injury. When Hays comes back though, I don’t know what they’ll do if there’s no other injuries. Somebody has to be the odd one out and I don’t see them DFA’ing Urias or Mateo. Possibly that could be their excuse to send down Holliday for a reset/service time if they think his chance at ROY is shot, but the bench composition works a lot better with the additional infielder. Anyway I hope Kjerstad rakes in the opportunities he gets now and makes it interesting. 
    • I didn't realize Heston had gotten to 10 home runs already this season.  That's wild stuff. I think this spells a little more bench time for Mounty, deserved or not.  VS RHP we'll see a little more O'hearn at 1B w/ Heston at DH.  If they want Mount in there then they'll sit Tony Taters every once in a while and either Heston or O'hearn can play RF.  Imagine Santander's switch hitting bat on the bench late - quite a weapon! All the talk about who gets starts where, but what this really does is makes the bench a true weapon that managers will have to think about when making pitching changes.  You sure you want to bring in that LHP in the 7th to face O'hearn?  OK, here's Mountcastle to take his place at 1B seamlessly and mash.   You sure you to want to bring in a RHP to face McCann?  OK we can bring in Heston and still have O'hearn for later, or vice-versa.  Its wild, its versatile, and it packs a real punch late in games.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...