Jump to content

MLBTRADERUMORS: Nick Markakis Stock Watch


weams

Recommended Posts

Nick is a guy who with the exception of the second half last year has been pretty dang good from a OBP perspective.

That gives him versatility in were you can use him in a lineup. Add in the fact he is still a solid fielder gives him some additional value IMO.

If a team needs a solid OF option to contend then you could do worse than Nick. On a 3-4 yrs deal you could reasonably expect him to be contributing in the final year of that type of deal. I expect him to get 3/40 or 4/50-55

Solid to me indicates someone who is an asset in the field.

I don't think that is Nick anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nick is a guy who with the exception of the second half last year has been pretty dang good from a OBP perspective.

That gives him versatility in were you can use him in a lineup. Add in the fact he is still a solid fielder gives him some additional value IMO.

If a team needs a solid OF option to contend then you could do worse than Nick. On a 3-4 yrs deal you could reasonably expect him to be contributing in the final year of that type of deal. I expect him to get 3/40 or 4/50-55

I doubt Nick gets that much. Nick Swisher got 4/$56 mm after posting an .850 OPS over four years with the Yankees. Nick hasn't had a single season of .850 OPS since 2008. Brett Gardner got 4/$52 mm after posting a .745 OPS the last four years, but he also steals bases and covers much more ground in the OF than Nick. Mike Cuddyer got 3/$31.5 mm in Colorado and I think that is more Nick's range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Nick gets that much. Nick Swisher got 4/$56 mm after posting an .850 OPS over four years with the Yankees. Nick hasn't had a single season of .850 OPS since 2008. Brett Gardner got 4/$52 mm after posting a .745 OPS the last four years, but he also steals bases and covers much more ground in the OF than Nick. Mike Cuddyer got 3/$31.5 mm in Colorado and I think that is more Nick's range.

Astros, for 3/30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick retires an Oriole. He's ours to be had IF DD offers anything reasonable. I think 3/30 4/40 gets it done. Nick doesn't seem like the type that wants to play anywhere else. He also strikes me as the type that walks away from the game early. He's got his family and his kids are already set for life. He has nothing left to prove. He's an Oriole until he's 34-35 and walks away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick retires an Oriole. He's ours to be had IF DD offers anything reasonable. I think 3/30 4/40 gets it done. Nick doesn't seem like the type that wants to play anywhere else. He also strikes me as the type that walks away from the game early. He's got his family and his kids are already set for life. He has nothing left to prove. He's an Oriole until he's 34-35 and walks away.

But why commit even that kind of money when he has no power and is no longer a top defensive OFer and likely to decline?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loyalty.

It won't be Dan's decision if it happens.

Like I said, I think much depends on how the rest of this season goes. DD is going to have no appetite for signing a .717 OPS OF to a multi-year deal. But at .800ish it is more tempting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, I think much depends on how the rest of this season goes. DD is going to have no appetite for signing a .717 OPS OF to a multi-year deal. But at .800ish it is more tempting.

It will be interesting to see.

Problem remains if you let Nick walk who plays LF and RF for the team? There is not a single reliably projectable prospect IMO that looks to be an everyday corner OF next year for us. None.

Cruz will be a FA and is more of a DH IMO than a LF.

I get not wanting to to overpay for a so-so player but what do you do about LF and RF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Astros, for 3/30.

If it's only for this much then we sign him. And I don't mean only because I like it, but it's cheap enough that the loyalty factor comes into play. Not sure that Nick accepts it.

Like I said, I think much depends on how the rest of this season goes. DD is going to have no appetite for signing a .717 OPS OF to a multi-year deal. But at .800ish it is more tempting.

"Markakis has upped his walk rate to 8.8 percent and is striking out a career-low 9.4 percent of his trips to the dish."

Also attractive for us since we are sorely lacking in the OBP dept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be interesting to see.

Problem remains if you let Nick walk who plays LF and RF for the team? There is not a single reliably projectable prospect IMO that looks to be an everyday corner OF next year for us. None.

Cruz will be a FA and is more of a DH IMO than a LF.

I get not wanting to to overpay for a so-so player but what do you do about LF and RF

Play Lombardozzi instead of Nick. Get one of the DH/Outfielders for the other position. One that is undervalued. There are always

plenty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Play Lombardozzi instead of Nick. Get one of the DH/Outfielders for the other position. One that is undervalued. There are always

plenty.

Lombardozzi ???? Sounds like a championship OF there....Pearce/Jones/Lombardozzi (not even considering Cruz, Markakis is far more feasible to resign)

I agree that Nick is not optimal as corner OF but Lombardozzi? I love the kid as utility guy who could slide to LF or RF to spell a starter but if the idea is to get better ...Lombardozzi is not the answer

Honestly with Bundy, E-Rod, Gausman and Harvey among others in this organization it might be time to move one of them or a current starter to get a guy who can play corner OF for the next few years .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lombardozzi ???? Sounds like a championship OF there....Pearce/Jones/Lombardozzi (not even considering Cruz, Markakis is far more feasible to resign)

I agree that Nick is not optimal as corner OF but Lombardozzi? I love the kid as utility guy who could slide to LF or RF to spell a starter but if the idea is to get better ...Lombardozzi is not the answer

Honestly with Bundy, E-Rod, Gausman and Harvey among others in this organization it might be time to move one of them or a current starter to get a guy who can play corner OF for the next few years .

It was just a response to those who day we need to Keep Nick because we have no one. Lombardozzi is not much different over the last two years. And probably more athletic. I just think that we can find that production elsewhere. For less than 30 million dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple question. What is the optimal solution next year at LF and RF in terms of bang for your buck. Lombardozzi?. Maybe. if you are into one bang for 50 cents.

There are always cheap flawed leftovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
    • Wait, since when is money no object? It remains to be seen what the budget constraints are going to be with the new ownership, but if Santander is projected to put up 3.0 WAR for $20 million and his replacement (Kjerstad/Cowser/Stowers...) can put up 2.5 WAR for less than a million then that will be factored in.  The goal will never be about being better than the other 29 teams in a payroll vacuum.
    • I think you have a good understanding and I assume you’ve read Ted Williams Science of Hitting.  It’s all about lining up planes of pitch and bat.  Historically with sinkers and low strikes a higher attack angle played and was more in alignment with pitch plane.  In today’s game of spin and high zone fastball an uppercut swing gives you minimal chance and results in top spin grounders and swing & miss. 
    • I'll bow to your expertise even if it seems unlikely to my laymen understanding. 
    • Actually it will.  As you noted.  MLB pitch plane is like 2-3 degrees.  The more your attack angle increased the more you’re hitting a top spin tennis return.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...