Jump to content

Claudecat's Place: Was Johnson the Best Ever?


weams

Recommended Posts

http://claudecat17.tumblr.com/

"On August 2, 1907, I encountered the most threatening sight I ever saw in the ball field. He was a rookie, and we licked our lips as we warmed up for the first game of a doubleheader in Washington. Evidently, manager Pongo Joe Cantillon of the Nats had picked a rube out of the cornfields of the deepest bushes to pitch against us. ? He was a tall, shambling galoot of about twenty, with arms so long they hung far out of his sleeves, and with a sidearm delivery that looked unimpressive at first glance. ? One of the Tigers imitated a cow mooing, and we hollered at Cantillon: ?Get the pitchfork ready, Joe?your hayseed?s on his way back to the barn.? ? The first time I faced him, I watched him take that easy windup. And then something went past me that made me flinch. The thing just hissed with danger. We couldn?t touch him. ? every one of us knew we?d met the most powerful arm ever turned loose in a ball park."
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't know who that is. The best I ever saw was

1. Pedro

2. Johnson

3. Santana

4. Kershaw

5. Lincecum

I'm only going by the dominance I saw in their prime and I left off Maddux because in the mid 90s I saw him, but too young to appreciate his pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know who that is. The best I ever saw was

1. Pedro

2. Johnson

3. Santana

4. Kershaw

5. Lincecum

I'm only going by the dominance I saw in their prime and I left off Maddux because in the mid 90s I saw him, but too young to appreciate his pitching.

Bob Gibson

Pedro

Koufax

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More often than not historians start their list with the Big Train. After him you get the following pitchers in some order:

Pete Alexander

Roger Clemens*

Lefty Grove

Christy Matthewson

Greg Maddux

Tom Seaver

Cy Young

The next group give-or-take looks like:

Bob Gibson

Randy Johnson

Kid Nichols

Satchel Paige

Warren Spahn

Koufax and Martinez would show up after that, typically because of their shorter careers. Bob Feller and Smoky Joe Williams find spots too. Steve Carlton often makes the top 20.

Sadly, Jim Palmer seems to be getting worse as the years go on, dropping easily to the 20s and sometimes the 30s on the all time list. People are penalizing him for the great defenses he had behind him (aka he takes a big hit in FIP). Whitey Ford's stock is also dropping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know who that is. The best I ever saw was

1. Pedro

2. Johnson

3. Santana

4. Kershaw

5. Lincecum

I'm only going by the dominance I saw in their prime and I left off Maddux because in the mid 90s I saw him, but too young to appreciate his pitching.

You don't know who Walter Johnson was? Wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know who that is. The best I ever saw was

1. Pedro

2. Johnson

3. Santana

4. Kershaw

5. Lincecum

I'm only going by the dominance I saw in their prime and I left off Maddux because in the mid 90s I saw him, but too young to appreciate his pitching.

[video=youtube;imwUHeuVqME]

Like Corn said, BEST of his time. Hard to compare eras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[video=youtube;imwUHeuVqME]

Like Corn said, BEST of his time. Hard to compare eras.

Deadball pitchers are the hardest to compare. Johnson usually faced lineups that were all-white, mostly under 6' and 175 lbs, used soggy baseballs, and played in many parks with 450 and 500-ft fences. It's well documented that pitchers of his era threw at 75% effort most of the game. 180 degrees out from the MLB of today. He might have still been good in a different way today. Maybe not. Certainly would have thrown about half as many innings, if he was even a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea... that was my thought. Especially in this area. Johnson isn't just the best Washington player, he's best by 10 miles. Original class of the Hall. 2nd in all time wins. I thought even most casual fans knew of him.

That statue of him out in CF at Nats Park is an abomination.

Statues are statues. Which means they STAND STILL. Trying to simulate motion just makes him look like some sort of space alien with multiple arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That statue of him out in CF at Nats Park is an abomination.

Statues are statues. Which means they STAND STILL. Trying to simulate motion just makes him look like some sort of space alien with multiple arms.

If he really was a space alien then maybe the apocryphal stories of him consistently throwing 100 mph (sidearm!) for 450 innings a year weren't so apocryphal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • That’s a lot cheaper than the alternatives.  Matz has kind of been up and down and has never been an innings eater.   He finished real strong his last six starts but a lat strain ended his season.  In some ways he has Oriole written all over him.   The fact that he’s 32 and his career high in IP is 160 makes me question if he really is their kind of guy.
    • If the team decided that Wells had just reached his innings limit and we just shut him down last year then I think the opinion of Wells’ 2023 season as a SP would be much different.  We need a SP and a high leverage reliever for next year. What role is Wells in 2023?  What’s best for Wells and the team long term?  Is this decision going to be about Wells, or more based on what FA takes our offer?  Whether that be a reliever or SP. People just write off Wells as a #5, but at the ASB you could make an argument for Wells, or Bradish, as who was our best SP. Wells was leading the AL in WHIP. Wells showed last year that he can be at least a #3 type of SP. Everyone has known since we took him in the Rule 5 draft that it was going to take some time to build him up to even 150-160 IP. Ok, so big deal… that didn’t happen in year two, and his first year starting full time. I don’t think the org just gives up on him as a SP like a lot have. I think he could be an All Star Closer. He would be our 3rd closer in a row to do that. That’s a very valuable role for us. But give me the SP that only gave up more than 3 ER three times in his first 18 starts. 
    • Matz is owed 2yr/$25 million. There’s no way that we’re paying that let alone trading for it. Trading isn’t a bad idea and I think it’s on the table for us if need be. 
    • Mathematically this makes no sense. Holiday is under team controls for at least 6 years and probably more because he hasn't played a single At Bat in the Majors yet.  So if you get 3 years of league minimum vs the $10M AAV, that's $27,840,000 MORE we are paying him in those 3 years. Let's add another $5M (assuming a $5M salary) in year4 / Arb1. Then another $3M (assuming a $7M salary) in year 5 Arb2.  Then let's assume he hits payday and gets $15M arbitration bucks in year 6. Subtract $5. Assuming the next 2 years would be free agent money of $25 per, we can Subtract $30M.   I was being generous with the arbitration guesses. And even then, the net result is that you're paying nearly an extra million dollars that you didn't have to, assuming all goes according to plan and he can play out the length of entire contract healthy. And assuming he's good. 
    • For me personally - this is my only source of information on the minor leagues and international players.   The reports and first hand accounts from posters and contributors on this board are a godsend for me.   I don't live anywhere near Baltimore, or the east coast for that matter, so I love to hear about the farm system.   This board is awesome.  Thanks to all who contribute and put me in my place when I'm wrong. 
    • I thoroughly enjoyed the too 30, especially the international players that are hard to get information on. I appreciate the hard work. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...