Jump to content

Orioles "Appear to be the Leading team of interest" to Get Samardzija


SticksandStones

Recommended Posts

I did, there aren't any compelling arguments. He's pitching in the NL. Prior to this year he had an ERA > 4. His ERA+ was 97. Yes, his peripherals are good (SO, BB) but overall he's nothing special. We'd be acquiring another middle tier pitcher...unless you buy into the idea that he's a TOR based on 11 starts.

Since 2012 17th best xFIP

26th best FIP

23rd most IP

10th best K/9

22nd best fWAR

Yeah he's nothing special, just another guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 335
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I did, there aren't any compelling arguments. He's pitching in the NL. Prior to this year he had an ERA > 4. His ERA+ was 97. Yes, his peripherals are good (SO, BB) but overall he's nothing special. We'd be acquiring another middle tier pitcher...unless you buy into the idea that he's a TOR based on 11 starts.

There's a huge number of degrees separating "nothing special" from "TOR" that you seem to not be considering at all. He can still be "very, very good" without being a TOR. Or "very good." Or just plain, old "good." If he's in the top third/top quarter/top ten in several important categories......odds are that he's closer to "TOR" on the spectrum than he is to "nothing special."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why the rebuilding Cubs would be interested in Norris.

As a rule, I think if someone needs to ask, tentatively, "could XYZ package work?" when the names that've been tossed around prior are top prospects...then the answer is always "no."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think if this trade happens, someone from the Big team is going back in the deal.

Why/who? The Cubs are done. They know it and why would we give up someone that is helping us. Maybe they might want Clevenger back I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could a package of Norris and ERod work?

Why would you give up your best pitcher (and a top prospect) for another pitcher? Samardjiza would be an upgrade over Norris but giving up norris to replace him would be a very marginal upgrade overall to the rotation. You would basically be giving up erod for someone like tj mcfarland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you give up your best pitcher (and a top prospect) for another pitcher? Samardjiza would be an upgrade over Norris but giving up norris to replace him would be a very marginal upgrade overall to the rotation. You would basically be giving up erod for someone like tj mcfarland.

Tell me how again this is a "very marginal upgrade".

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=pit&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2014&month=0&season1=2014&ind=0&team=0&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=3254%2c9492

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why/who? The Cubs are done. They know it and why would we give up someone that is helping us. Maybe they might want Clevenger back I suppose.

By the time this deal is made I imagine that Johan Santana is going to be up, and if he is I gotta think that bumps Gonzalez or Chen to the pen. If Samardzija if acquired, then Chen or Gonzalez would be the other one bumped. I can't see both Chen and Gonzalez in the pen.

Maybe they aren't traded in the Cubs deal, but I think that one of them will be traded if he is acquired.

Just a hunch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Still with a chance to do this for the first time since 1982-83. Would be one more nice accomplishment for this organization. 
    • The weird thing about our bullpen is that they rarely blow leads.   They have a 69% save rate, 4th highest in baseball.  They make it scary, but generally, when they have the lead, they get the job done.   Where they are really bad is keeping games close when we’re down a run or two, last night being a classic example of that.   This year’s team has 32 comeback wins, compared to 48 last year.   Why is that?   Part of it is obviously on the offense, but part of it is that the bullpen doesn’t keep us in striking distance when we’re behind.   One way you can tell this is by the W/L records of the starters and the bullpen.  Last year, the starters were 57-40, this year they’re 60-49.   The starter got the decision 12 more times this year than last year, including 9 more losses (with 3 games to play).   That tells you that when the team is losing when the starter is pulled, they keep losing.  Meanwhile, the relievers were 44-21 last year, 28-22 now. They’re not picking up wins because they don’t give the offense a chance to catch up and get the win for the bullpen guy.    
    • I do not disagree with above posts.  Also I am pretty sure that this time last season, the Texas Rangers Hangout was saying the exact same things as the Rangers Pen.  Point being, you never know until you know.  The pen is shaky, but is capable of putting together a solid run from time to time.  
    • Roster Resource thinks it has tonight's lineup and Kjerstad on bench again. He is 7 AB shy of 130 MLB regular season AB with 3 games left, and if he ends up short some prospect list makers may still label him one.    If still with the Orioles, he will be 26 years old by Sarasota. I think the OP has its answer as it has been Cole and Lopez these two nights and the team is preparing for that intensity.
    • I care I bet the over on 88 wins, looked like a lock now not so much, come on O’s, daddy needs some new shoes
    • I’d have brought up Young immediately after DFAing Kimbrel. Baker has no place on this club this year. Would have been nice to see Young up here.
    • Yeah, but they could've brought him up a month ago and seen what they might have...And Im not "pining" for Brandon Young, just wondering if he's any better than some we have in the pen..
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...