Jump to content

Zach Britton = Mariano Rivera?


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Never extend a pitcher with 4.26 career ERA working on a season mark of 0.74.

In any case, he'd probably want a deal buying out his three arb years plus another year or two. You'd be paying him for roughly 70 x 5 = 350 innings, based mostly on his performance in his last 36.

Well said. And yet real live MLB teams keep falling for the same trap again and again because the agents don't want to let them in on this little secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2012 JJ had a K/9 rate of 5.4, out of the pen. That is nearly the complete opposite of unhittable.

Let's amend that then.

Jim Johnson has a 95-96mph sinker no one could hit out of the infield. Only he stunk fielding his position and that hurt us. Then he lost it...

Statistically, he was Mariano Rivera. And then he wasn't. What made Mariano himself was that he did it for like 27 years. Not 2. Or 2 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's amend that then.

Statistically, he was Mariano Rivera. And then he wasn't. What made Mariano himself was that he did it for like 27 years. Not 2. Or 2 months.

Having a fistful of rings is also part of it. If Rivera had been a Padre his entire career...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many planets, moons, and minor and/or dwarf planets lack any substantial atmosphere, reducing drag to almost zero, and allowing pitchers to throw baseballs at a higher velocity than you can on Earth.

Must spread rep. I was hoping someone would say that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even Rivera threw other pitches. If he really only threw the cutter 100% of the time it would have been less effective. If he only threw the cutter every time he depended on the next pitch it would have been less effective.

It's like the argument with Adam Jones - why does anyone ever throw him a strike? Well, if all the pitchers only threw him balls it would take about two games for him to catch on and walk every plate appearance, and they'd go back to mixing in balls and strikes. (Cue the jokes about Jones never learning and still swinging even if every pitch went to the backstop...)

Again, no. He threw a fastball and a cut fastball. That was it. If you want to split hairs and say the fastball is not the cut fastball, ok, but he threw the cutter over 90 percent of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...