Jump to content

You Mean To Tell Me That We Can't Do Better Than Flaherty?


WNY Orioles Fan

Recommended Posts

Dude is totally useless. Last year it was a struggle just to get above 200 and this year he's hitting 220? I'm being totally serious, we have to have someone in our farm system that can do a little better than that. Can't we at least make some sort of a

trade?

PLEASE, GET THIS BUM OFF THE TEAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Unfortunately all of our better options (about three of them in Norfolk) are second basemen. Flaherty is the backup SS. The simple option of moving Manny over to short on days where Hardy needs a rest would allow us to send him down. But Buck refuses to do this for some reason.

I agree, Flaherty is utterly worthless with the bat. For the third year in a row now. And he's 27, or is it 28 now? Development time is over. He's not going to get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately all of our better options (about three of them in Norfolk) are second basemen. Flaherty is the backup SS. The simple option of moving Manny over to short on days where Hardy needs a rest would allow us to send him down. But Buck refuses to do this for some reason.

I agree, Flaherty is utterly worthless with the bat. For the third year in a row now. And he's 27, or is it 28 now? Development time is over. He's not going to get better.

He's a Buck guy. He's going no where.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a Buck guy. He's going no where.

Sadly, you might be right. But it really makes no sense to keep all three of Flaherty, Schoop and Lough even more so with Wieters out and Joseph and Hundley are here. Young looks like he's going to get more playing time, and since he's the only pinch "hitter" who can hit, we might get more of the same until Buck wakes up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing totally worthless are the posts saying Flaherty is totally worthless. You are just pissed because he hit into a DP to end the game tonight. And you've obviously already forgotten that just 3 weeks ago, Flaherty's 3-run HR beat the Red Sox. The reality is, Flaherty is the consummate utility player, capable of playing every infield position, and the corner OF positions in an emergency. Plus, he has some power - 10 HR in only 246 AB's last year, including a walk-off 3-run HR against the Blue Jays. He is capable of getting key hits, but like most utility players, he won't hit for average.

And, the Orioles have no one anywhere near as versatile at Norfolk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing totally worthless are the posts saying Flaherty is totally worthless. You are just pissed because he hit into a DP to end the game tonight. And you've obviously already forgotten that just 3 weeks ago, Flaherty's 3-run HR beat the Red Sox. The reality is, Flaherty is the consummate utility player, capable of playing every infield position, and the corner OF positions in an emergency. Plus, he has some power - 10 HR in only 246 AB's last year, including a walk-off 3-run HR against the Blue Jays. He is capable of getting key hits, but like most utility players, he won't hit for average.

And, the Orioles have no one anywhere near as versatile at Norfolk.

A post that makes sense in a thread fraught with hyperbolic knee jerk-ism. I'd maybe have let Caleb bat, but Flaherty is nowhere near as bad a hitter as his penchant for starting seasons with huge 0-fer streaks makes him appear. Flaherty hit .274 and slugged over .480 during the final four months of last season, and if you remove the 0-17 season start from his numbers this year, he's around .260. How's Schoop looking in comparison to that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing totally worthless are the posts saying Flaherty is totally worthless. You are just pissed because he hit into a DP to end the game tonight. And you've obviously already forgotten that just 3 weeks ago, Flaherty's 3-run HR beat the Red Sox. The reality is, Flaherty is the consummate utility player, capable of playing every infield position, and the corner OF positions in an emergency. Plus, he has some power - 10 HR in only 246 AB's last year, including a walk-off 3-run HR against the Blue Jays. He is capable of getting key hits, but like most utility players, he won't hit for average.

And, the Orioles have no one anywhere near as versatile at Norfolk.

This post is totally futile, it requires a modicum of baseball intelligence to understand, and there fore does not belong in this thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post is totally futile, it requires a modicum of baseball intelligence to understand, and there fore does not belong in this thread.

Really? So there's no case at all to be made that we could and should do better than Ryan flaherty?

The guy is apparently a jack of all trades, master of none or more precisely, sufficient at none.

If we don't have any better options in the organization, it's time to make a trade.

At least schoop is young, he has an excuse for his struggles. Flaherty's defense is vastly overrated, so he's a back up ss, who cares, if he really needs too, manny can play SS.

Flaherty really does not bring much value to this team other than the ability to give multiple guys "off days".

If we really want to be playoff contenders, we need to upgrade second base and no, this isn't an overreaction to tonight, quite a few of us have been saying this for a while.

Rickie weeks, Daniel Murphy, brad miller, maybe chase utley.....there are quite a few available options out there better than flaherty/schoop.

We have an array of young arms that can't all pitch at the major league level, is be fine with flipping someone like E-rod+ another lesser prospect for a second baseman from the above list.

Heck give up a little more if we can get utley or Murphy. But a playoff team can't afford a light hitting catcher, a struggling SS and a black hole at second base.

A .500 or worse team can, but a legitimate playoff contender has to upgrade that position, especially with wieters out for the season, hardy and Davis struggling and no guarantee manny rounds back into form.

Time to take an HONEST look in the mirror, flaherty and lough aren't good enough role players for this team if we want to catch the blue jays and stay ahead of the Yankees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post is totally futile, it requires a modicum of baseball intelligence to understand, and there fore does not belong in this thread.

Flaherty has 20 ABs as a pinch hitter in his career. He's 4-for-20 in those ABs (which may or may not include last night's appearance...not sure if BBref and fangraphs have updated yet) with 0 extra base hits, 0 walks, and 0 RBI.

Y'all insist on maintaining your love affair with Flaherty for his "versatility," despite the evidence that he's no better than average at even his best position (2B), fine. At this point, there's obviously no stopping you. But Flaherty shouldn't be starting games, and he shouldn't be a pinch hitting option. Versatility does absolutely nothing for a .214 BA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaherty has 20 ABs as a pinch hitter in his career. He's 4-for-20 in those ABs (which may or may not include last night's appearance...not sure if BBref and fangraphs have updated yet) with 0 extra base hits, 0 walks, and 0 RBI.

Y'all insist on maintaining your love affair with Flaherty for his "versatility," despite the evidence that he's no better than average at even his best position (2B), fine. At this point, there's obviously no stopping you. But Flaherty shouldn't be starting games, and he shouldn't be a pinch hitting option. Versatility does absolutely nothing for a .214 BA.

This would be wrong. He has almost 800 innings at second base. Both DRS and UZR show him as above average to date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? So there's no case at all to be made that we could and should do better than Ryan flaherty?

The guy is apparently a jack of all trades, master of none or more precisely, sufficient at none.

If we don't have any better options in the organization, it's time to make a trade.

At least schoop is young, he has an excuse for his struggles. Flaherty's defense is vastly overrated, so he's a back up ss, who cares, if he really needs too, manny can play SS.

Flaherty really does not bring much value to this team other than the ability to give multiple guys "off days".

If we really want to be playoff contenders, we need to upgrade second base and no, this isn't an overreaction to tonight, quite a few of us have been saying this for a while.

Rickie weeks, Daniel Murphy, brad miller, maybe chase utley.....there are quite a few available options out there better than flaherty/schoop.

We have an array of young arms that can't all pitch at the major league level, is be fine with flipping someone like E-rod+ another lesser prospect for a second baseman from the above list.

Heck give up a little more if we can get utley or Murphy. But a playoff team can't afford a light hitting catcher, a struggling SS and a black hole at second base.

A .500 or worse team can, but a legitimate playoff contender has to upgrade that position, especially with wieters out for the season, hardy and Davis struggling and no guarantee manny rounds back into form.

Time to take an HONEST look in the mirror, flaherty and lough aren't good enough role players for this team if we want to catch the blue jays and stay ahead of the Yankees.

Saw your name, knew exactly what was coming. :2yay-thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are the stats, specifically?

Actually, never mind. I looked for myself. DRS has him at +3. According to fangraphs, "0" is average and "+5" is above average. So we can split hairs over that one if you want, but it's not crystal clear that he falls comfortably into either category. UZR does put him into the above average category at 2B, so I'll concede that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Does it matter if they get drafted and developed vs. traded for and developed? Hell, the O's starting rotation was a strength this year. Here's a breakdown of how it was constructed: Burnes - traded for (Elias) Suarez - free agent (Elias) Kremer - traded for (Duquette) Eflin - traded for (Elias) Grayson - drafted (Duquette) Bradish - traded for (Elias) Povich - traded for (Elias) Irvin - traded for (Elias) Tyler Wells - Rule V (Elias) Rogers - traded for (Elias) McDermott - traded for (Elias) Means - drafted (Duquette) I'm excluding Bowman being an opener and getting a starting credit.  But that said, out of all of the starters that the O's used this year, none were drafted by Elias, and only 2 were drafted by the O's (GRod, Means). 8 were acquired via trade (7 by Elias, 1 by Duquette), and 2 via FA or Rule V.  I don't necessarily think that Elias needs to draft starters to build a rotation, but it would be nice to see a couple make it before being traded, TBH.  That said, I don't think the above is sustainable, but the strategy would be sustainable if you have free agency play a bigger part. Look at the Royals. Their best 3 starters weren't drafted by them (Ragans - traded for, Wacha - FA, Lugo - FA). 
    • Unfortunately, it's looking like there is a lot of truth in that statement.  I believe Steve Bisciotti (Ravens owner) once said, he wanted to have a good team every year, get into the playoffs enough, eventually things go your way and win the Super Bowl.  This was in response to playing salary cap games for a few seasons and then eventually having to pay the piper with the dead money and being uncompetitive for a few years. Hopefully the O's can be consistently good and get hot at the end of the season and make a run through the playoffs.  Go back to June 1st and the five best teams in the league were the Orioles, Yankees, Guardians, Phillies and Dodgers.  Two are already out, Guardians fading fast with the Yankees and Dodgers still alive.   A Tigers - Mets World Series would be quite fitting.
    • Elias has a history (albeit as an AGM) of extending core players. He did it with the Astros. The main question: did he not do it here because of John Angelos wanting to keep the books clean for a sale...or as some fundamental shift in GM strategy. I think it's more a function of ownership, because outside of Chris Davis and Adam Jones, when is the last time you saw a longish term contract for a position player? I think Peter Angelos and Duquette screwed the pooch on not extending Machado, and I think Duquette set this organization back years with an incredibly poor trade deadline return for so many players.  All that said, players I'd look to extend in terms of priority: Gunnar Henderson Jordan Westburg Adley Rutschman I'm on record as thinking that Adley's second half woes were a function of nagging injury (wrist, back). I think he bounces back next year. But we absolutely need to get Gunnar locked up long term. I don't want to hear any nonsense any longer from GMs or ownership about taking two to tango. If the Braves, Astros, hell the freaking *ROYALS* can do it, we can do it.  You cannot repeat the sins of letting Machado go. He's been a near 24 bWAR player for the Padres in 6 years. I'm not talking about his recent contract extension, but rather his original 10 year, $300m contract back in 2019 when he was only 26 years old.  Get it done, Elias. Rubenstein, step up to the plate. 
    • I would too…but again, Bradish and GRod could be that. The point in bringing up Burnes is we “lucked” into that guy for 2024. It didn’t work out in terms of winning in October. Lots of teams with high level starters don’t make the playoffs or see those starters fail in the postseason.  
    • I don't think we have Burnes here anymore, but we'll see. These guys all get hurt.  That wasn't the point, really...but we all hope that they have good pitchers that can stay healthy, an increasingly unlikely scenario in MLB as we head into 2025. Skubal has had injury issues, yes.  But I'd still like for Elias to have a guy like that come through the system.
    • He already looks a step slow in the outfield.  Trout has definitely been disproportionately hit by injuries going by age, but perhaps not if you go by games played. He has put a lot of miles on his legs.  True, the median outcome for productive age is probably somewhere in between Trout and Nelson Cruz.
    • Losing record against winning clubs, get to face the White Sox 13 times a year (10-3). they did do well against the East, but a 32 game sample outside division against the East vs. in division, which they had a losing record against everybody not named the White Sox, speaks volumes.  I do they think they're a very good team from a pitching standpoint. I think their offense is pretty mid, but excellent pitching, defense can hold up a so-so offense. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...