Jump to content

Yankee Fan Suing ESPN/Yankees for $10M


notyourbuddy

Recommended Posts

A baseball fan who dozed off during a Yankee-Red Sox game sued the Yankees, ESPN and its announcers for defamation, claiming they broadcast photos of him asleep in his chair, calling him "fatty, unintelligent, [and] stupid.

The false statements include but are not limited to:

  • "Plaintiff is unintelligent and stupid individual."
  • "Plaintiff is not worthy to be fan of the New York Yankee."
  • "Plaintiff is a fatty cow that need two seats at all time and represent symbol of failure."
  • "Plaintiff is a confused disgusted and socially bankrupt individual."
  • "Plaintiff is confused individual that neither understands nor knows anything about history and the meaning of rivalry between Red Sox and New York Yankee."
  • "Plaintiff is so stupid that he cannot differentiate between his house and public place by snoozing throughout the fourth inning of the Yankee game."

Full Article: http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/07/07/69299.htm

<iframe src='http://mlb.mlb.com/shared/video/embed/embed.html?content_id=32071463&width=400&height=224&property=mlb' width='400' height='224' frameborder='0'>Your browser does not support iframes.</iframe>

I wonder how these things work. Will the League/ESPN give this lawsuit the finger or attempt to buy him out with a small settlement + tickets to future games just to make him go away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're giving his lawyers far too much credit.

I believe this is the very definition of the word frivolous. My question is, where did his lawyers get the phrase "fatty cow" from in this particular instance?

It's beyond frivolous. Rector's attorney, Mr. Valentine Okwara, must have quit school after the 3d grade based on the grammar and spelling in the filed complaint. And the "derogatory" comments cited in the complaint were not made by ESPN, their announcers, MLB or the Yankees organization. They were comments posted on the MLB.com site by folks who read the posted article and viewed the video clip. Rector became a side line story and his case stands no chance in court if a judge even agrees to hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Just one add on IP.  Just looked, Kirby only pitched 67 innings last season, over 15 starts.  Seems likely limited, he missed a month due to a shoulder injury in 2021?  I'd see this as a similar use case as GRod.  He's at 152 IP this year.
    • Sorry, Denoyer wasn't part of that 5, but in my mind he was. The top 4, plus Denoyer and Mav is what I meant
    • He pitched 103 last year.  So an ideal season would have him at 125-140 this year.  Understand he didn't get there, but wouldn't you like to try to get 150 out of him next year so he's still there for stretch run/postseason assuming that's needed?  How do you make that feasible?
    • Pitchers to cut/leavingFA Anthony Castro Chris Ellis - 60 Day IL Logan Gillaspie Louis Head Jordan Lyles Jake Reed Beau Susler Chris Vallimont Spenser Watkins Cathers, IF Cut/LeavingFA Robinson Chirinos Cam Gallagher Tyler Nevin  Rougned Odor Jesus Aguilar I am going to give a spot to Diaz, its AAA Depth and we can always cut him after ST. With Means coming of the 60 Day, I think that puts us at 12 Open Spots I'm probably only protecting 6 MILB guys, so I would go into my offseason with 6 open spots and start crushing the Waiver Wire (the 5 listed in the original post plus Maverick (I know its slim, but we really have almost no catching depth in the milb and we have to protect it even if its a 1% chance hes selected in the Rule V) There's a part of me that wants to keep a couple of the pitchers listed above, but I believe many would pass through waivers and those that don't can easily be replaced on the waiver wire. That's probably where we could find some more catcher depth too, but I'd use most of those spots on more waiver wire pitching like last year.      
    • This is a huge winter for Mateo.  he should have confidence enough to put in the work to get better for next year.  The Orioles gave him a chance.  He took it.   Now put in the work Mr. Mateo.
    • Well, if you miss on 4th down, you assume they get it at the 2.  The idea that they got it on the 20 changes everything. I don’t mind the decision, after reading more and hearing more explanations.  I still think he should have taken the points but ultimately, I think at best they go into OT if they took the points and more than likely lose in regular time.
    • I mean, I can see being upset that they didn’t play well and blew the playoff chance.  I just don’t get why it matters that it was to division teams.  I’m more upset that they lost to Detroit and Oakland, teams that were far inferior.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...