Jump to content

Trade proposal: Bundy and Jimenez for Cole Hamels


isestrex

Recommended Posts

I posted this to a bunch of Philly fans first just to gauge their response. I'll tell you what it was after we get the initial reaction from the OH.

Basically this is the Phillies swallowing the bad Jimenez contract in order to acquire Bundy. Hamels, meanwhile is signed through 2018 (with a 2019 option) with at least $112.5M left on his contract (that's $22.5M/year).

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I posted this to a bunch of Philly fans first just to gauge their response. I'll tell you what it was after we get the initial reaction from the OH.

Basically this is the Phillies swallowing the bad Jimenez contract in order to acquire Bundy. Hamels, meanwhile is signed through 2018 (with a 2019 option) with at least $112.5M left on his contract (that's $22.5M/year).

What say you?

UMMM, no!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this to a bunch of Philly fans first just to gauge their response. I'll tell you what it was after we get the initial reaction from the OH.

Basically this is the Phillies swallowing the bad Jimenez contract in order to acquire Bundy. Hamels, meanwhile is signed through 2018 (with a 2019 option) with at least $112.5M left on his contract (that's $22.5M/year).

What say you?

No thank you. I doubt Philly would even listen to this anyway. If they trade Hammel they can get back a haul similar to what the Cubs got without eating any money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this to a bunch of Philly fans first just to gauge their response. I'll tell you what it was after we get the initial reaction from the OH.

Basically this is the Phillies swallowing the bad Jimenez contract in order to acquire Bundy. Hamels, meanwhile is signed through 2018 (with a 2019 option) with at least $112.5M left on his contract (that's $22.5M/year).

What say you?

That's worse than when I said trade Bundy for Samardzja.

I mean im for trading Bundy and another minor prospect or two for a vet pitcher. But I don't see how trading possibly two rotation guys next year for one aging one would help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this to a bunch of Philly fans first just to gauge their response. I'll tell you what it was after we get the initial reaction from the OH.

Basically this is the Phillies swallowing the bad Jimenez contract in order to acquire Bundy. Hamels, meanwhile is signed through 2018 (with a 2019 option) with at least $112.5M left on his contract (that's $22.5M/year).

What say you?

No thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this to a bunch of Philly fans first just to gauge their response. I'll tell you what it was after we get the initial reaction from the OH.

Basically this is the Phillies swallowing the bad Jimenez contract in order to acquire Bundy. Hamels, meanwhile is signed through 2018 (with a 2019 option) with at least $112.5M left on his contract (that's $22.5M/year).

What say you?

I really don't mean offense by this, but I'd say that if you're willing to call a 4/50 contract for Ubaldo "bad" after 3.5 months, then you're not mentally prepared to take on a contract that will pay Hamels $22.5 million annually through 2018. And I'd wager the O's aren't, either.

As rocky as he's been, Ubaldo actually doesn't have to improve all that much to be "worth" his contract. Hamels, on the other hand, can't be less than stellar in order to make his remaining contract years worthwhile. The "surplus value" period is over in Hamels' case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this to a bunch of Philly fans first just to gauge their response. I'll tell you what it was after we get the initial reaction from the OH.

Basically this is the Phillies swallowing the bad Jimenez contract in order to acquire Bundy. Hamels, meanwhile is signed through 2018 (with a 2019 option) with at least $112.5M left on his contract (that's $22.5M/year).

What say you?

Where were the Phillies fans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'd give it to Burnes.  Great performance after the rough patch he went through.    
    • How can you even type the letters that spell that name?  If he were to become the coach, the entire team would participate in mandatory satanic rituals that include sacrificing children and the mutilation of newborn puppies. I heard from a reliable source that him, who we should not name, once bit the head off a baby kitten nun before going to bat and then mouth kissed the umpire who gave him an automatic home run. 
    • That's not true in the case of Chourio whatsoever, and using him as an example actually supports the point that those of us are making that are advocating for Mayo to get more playing time - that elite prospects need to play every day to get comfortable, and their teams need to let them struggle if need be. Chourio had a .558 OPS in April in 85 at bats, and he had .542 OPS in May in 65 at bats. He struggled mightily, but the Brewers gave him regular playing time and let him play through it. The precise thing the Orioles have failed to do with Mayo, Kjerstad, Norby, Cowser, Westburg, Ortiz, and Stowers. 
    • By the time Rutschman had 180 PA, his   OPS was well over .700.   Ditto Cowser.   Holliday at .524 is struggling way more than those two did.  He’s also several years younger, so maybe a longer adjustment period is to be expected.   But it’s still pretty disappointing that he’s not making much progress right now, after looking a little better when his second call-up started.   I don’t consider Mayo comparable.  He hasn’t even had 40 PA yet, and his playing time has been way more sporadic than Holliday’s.  He’s had a bad start but not enough PT to wonder why he hasn’t shown improvement yet.     
    • Mid 80s.   The problem was that I had no idea where it was going.
    • You said it many more words, but yea, baseball managers have less impact on the game than any other major sport. Baseball is a culmination of individual performances, which are largely out of a manager’s control. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...