Jump to content

AJ's approach: Are you fine with it?


tettleton14

Recommended Posts

Two guys playing today who seem to have a similar profile are Wilin Rosario (.786 OPS, 4.5% walk rate in 1213 PA) and Salvador Perez (.775 OPS, 4.4% walk rate in 1382 PA). Both are younger than Adam and may pick up more plate discipline as they gain experience. And Rosario's .786 OPS is heavily influenced by playing at Coors. He's not really as good a hitter as Adam.

I think it should also be noted that various points in history had significantly higher walk/lower K rates than today. 1949 - 4.06 walks/game, 3.61 K/game. For quite a lot of history players like Jones simply didn't exist, at least not in the form they do today. Gus Zerniel probably had an approach at the plate very similar to Jones, and his worst year he had a 110:38 K:BB ratio. There were only eight player-seasons from 1945-55 with >80 Ks, < 40 BBs.

To really do this comparison right you'd have to adjust for league context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Today's fun fact:

The league average K/PA % is 19.7%. Adam Jones strikes out in 17.5% of his PA by comparison. Same as Manny, less than guys like Pearce and Cruz, and of course much less than Davis (32.4%).

So Jones is better than your average MLB'er at putting the ball in play, even if it doesn't seem like it at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's fun fact:

The league average K/PA % is 19.7%. Adam Jones strikes out in 17.5% of his PA by comparison. Same as Manny, less than guys like Pearce and Cruz, and of course much less than Davis (32.4%).

So Jones is better than your average MLB'er at putting the ball in play, even if it doesn't seem like it at times.

It is not really too surprising, because Adam puts balls in play early in the count relatively often, instead of getting into deep counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once that bat slows down its not going to be pretty. I wouldnt count Jones out when he reaches 35 though. Sheffield had a quick bat and he played a long time.

I think at that point, he will reinvent himself as a Nick Markakis type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think at that point, he will reinvent himself as a Nick Markakis type.

I seriously doubt that Jones' style of play will ever remotely resemble Markakis'. They are very different players, whose skills complement each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Reminds me of Miguel Gonzalez, who came out of nowhere to be a major contributor to some playoff runs.  I doubt he ends up as a rotation mainstay. But I was certain O'Hearn would turn into a pumpkin after a few weeks too and he still hasn't.
    • If it weren’t for the service time component I think Holliday would have a very long leash before being sent down. He’s still contributing positively on defense and AAA pitchers just were not challenging him anymore. The priority above all else should be what is best for his long term development, and he needs to struggle against MLB pitching for longer than this to get to a point where you feel it’s doing more harm than good. I do think there can be some merit to the idea that MLB time exposes some weakness, which then can be worked on in a lower-stress environment in AAA, but I don’t think that’s strictly necessary since he’d be working on the same things against MLB pitching. However, the Orioles are now in a tricky situation where if it becomes apparent that Holliday is not going to win ROY, they have a strong incentive to send him down for at least a short stint to get the extra year. How they navigate that without that being totally transparent is tough. They could definitely do it now and nobody would claim service time manipulation given his struggles, but I don’t think they want to yet for purely development purposes. If he’s still struggling with around 100 PAs that’s when I think they make the move. 
    • Yea, definitely a concern. Hes a great story but really good pitchers don’t normally sit around in obscurity until their mid 30s.     It’s possible they found something in him but the realistic thing is that this is short lived but perhaps there is a role for him in the pen and he can have a late blooming career as a reliever.  Nothing wrong with that.
    • New Kids on the Block line-up — could be more fun than the singing group.
    • The main concern I have is the amount of hard contact and looking at statcast bears that out. 15th percentile in Avg Exit Velocity at 91 MPH and 7th percentile in Hard Hit % at 51.6%.
    • If he doesn't show anything, why would they bring hm back (especially to the rotation)? 
    • I'm sort of bracing for what happened in ST, which was that he started super strong and kind of faded with each start. He was already down a mph or so on his fastball in this last one, but then again he had a much better changeup this time.  So we'll see. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...