Jump to content

Zach Britton - No need for a closer


brianod

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
He set that pitch up on a tee for Donaldson.

Might have been his worse executed pitch all season.

You make a good point. That was the single worst pitch I have seen Britton throw this season. He's pitched extraordinarily well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's pitched extraordinarily well.
Overall he has certainly exceeded expectations.

Are you making a distinction there? Expectations for Britton weren't very high, considering his track record coming into this season. I'd say he's pitched extraordinarily well by almost any standard.

At the same time, there are a ton of closers having very good seasons. There are 7 guys with at least 20 saves and a 90% save rate. There are 10 who have 20 saves and a sub-1.00 WHIP. There are 12 who have at least 20 saves and 10 K/9. There are 9 with at least 20 saves and a sub-.200 BAA. There are 7 with at least 20 saves and an ERA under 2.00. Greg Holland and Huston Street are doing all of those things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you making a distinction there? Expectations for Britton weren't very high, considering his track record coming into this season. I'd say he's pitched extraordinarily well by almost any standard.

At the same time, there are a ton of closers having very good seasons. There are 7 guys with at least 20 saves and a 90% save rate. There are 10 who have 20 saves and a sub-1.00 WHIP. There are 12 who have at least 20 saves and 10 K/9. There are 9 with at least 20 saves and a sub-.200 BAA. There are 7 with at least 20 saves and an ERA under 2.00. Greg Holland and Huston Street are doing all of those things.

The bar for extraordinarily well keeps getting higher as league wide offensive numbers continue to drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bar for extraordinarily well keeps getting higher as league wide offensive numbers continue to drop.

Exactly, which is why I never understood those defending JJ last year. IMO Holland and Kimbrel are the top dogs right now. Those guys are just filthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, which is why I never understood those defending JJ last year. IMO Holland and Kimbrel are the top dogs right now. Those guys are just filthy.

I didn't understand why folks were claiming JJ was anything special after his 2012 season. How you could look at his peripherals with an unbiased eye and not see the coming regression...

And before anyone gets on me, his 2012 season was special, not him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bar for extraordinarily well keeps getting higher as league wide offensive numbers continue to drop.
Exactly, which is why I never understood those defending JJ last year. IMO Holland and Kimbrel are the top dogs right now. Those guys are just filthy.

Those defending JJ last year never said he was doing extraordinarily well, just that he hadn't been as awful as his detractors insisted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those defending JJ last year never said he was doing extraordinarily well, just that he hadn't been as awful as his detractors insisted.

Well that doesn't really change the fact that he shouldn't have been the closer, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't understand why folks were claiming JJ was anything special after his 2012 season. How you could look at his peripherals with an unbiased eye and not see the coming regression...

And before anyone gets on me, his 2012 season was special, not him.

First, I don't think anyone in his right mind should have expected JJ to repeat his 2012 season, in terms of his 94.4% save percentage. That said, 2012 was not that much of an outlier for JJ in other ways. In 2011 he had a 2.67 ERA, 1.11 WHIP, 5.7 K/9, 2.76 K/BB. 2012 was not much different, 2.49, 1.09, 5.4 and 2.73. In 2008, he had 2.23, 1.19, 5.0, 1.36. Even 2013 was not that far off in those terms, 2.94, 1.28, 7.2, 3.11.

Overall, JJ was a solid above average reliever in his time with the O's. He did a solid job as our closer during the period he had that job, obviously better in 2012 than in 2013, but overall, solid despite having a tremendous workload in terms of save opportunities over a two year period. I certainly didn't see his 2014 disaster coming, but at the same time, it was pretty obvious that he wasn't worth $10 mm. I'm glad we avoided being part of his 2014 train wreck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bar for extraordinarily well keeps getting higher as league wide offensive numbers continue to drop.

And yet Brett (Freaking) Gardner goes deep twice off Yu last night (in a SSS). Melky had two also.....btw - BG's at bats were special not Brett.....;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet Brett (Freaking) Gardner goes deep twice off Yu last night (in a SSS). Melky had two also.....btw - BG's at bats were special not Brett.....;)
I just blame the parents of Brett Gardner. I just blame them for creating a great hitter.

Gardner is 5 for 11 with four homers against Darvish for his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was in a very good place to hit. Still, a first pitch 95-97 mph fastball to get ahead in the count isn't the worst pitch in the world. Donaldson got all of it and it went out. It happens. The two hits before that were a dribbler down to 3B for an infield single and a handle shot into RF for a soft single. With a little luck, Donaldson's shot would have been a 2 out solo homer and the O's still would have been up a run.

I wasn't discussing the outing as a whole, just that pitch. Donaldson is a top player in the league and he is one of those guys on my "He will not beat me" list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Imagine having the thought that a baseball team like this could be dead so early in the season when they’re on pace to win as many games as they did last year. 
    • @Moose Milligan as a long time vet of this board, you gotta know that the better the Orioles get and the more relevant that they become, we are going to have people show up on this board who are either a) trolls b) bandwagon fans c) not that knowledgeable  I’ve noticed more and more people showing up and saying crazy things that don’t make sense. I guess it comes with the territory of having a great team.
    • Was it the same person who said this team was dead?
    • I’m dead serious. That’s one regular (who starter last week) and it was to be expected that he would struggle like almost all young guys do when they make the jump to the Majors.  Hays doesn’t play everyday and was just playing yesterday to give Santander a rest. Yes Santander is struggling, so by my count that makes 2 guys struggling who are getting everyday ABs. And even if you go by the TWO that played yesterday, I have a hard time coming up with a figure that adds up to several.  Unless, your math or understanding of the English language is different than mine. I don’t see TWO as equating to several guys, as you stated.
    • Someone said the other day he’s just another guy and should be cut. 
    • Outside of Cowser, he’s the biggest surprise of the season so far for me. 
    • It’s interesting to compare the careers of McFarland and Danny Coulombe.  TJ debuted in 2013 and is 35; Danny debuted in 2014 and is 34.   TJ has appeared in 362 big league games, throwing 480.1 innings at a 4.16 ERA (101 ERA+), and has been worth -0.1 rWAR; Danny has appeared in 262 games, throwing 250.1 IP aa 3.63 ERA (114 ERA+) and has been worth  3.1 rWAR.   Going into this season, TJ had accrued 8.028 years of service and had been paid $10.5 mm; Danny had accrued 5.008 years and had been paid $5.2 mm.  So I’d say at this point that McFatland has spent more time and bern used more heavily in the majors than Coulombe, and has been better paid, even though Coulombe has been more effective. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...