Jump to content

Was ERod too much for Andrew Miller


isestrex

ERod for Miller  

224 members have voted

  1. 1. ERod for Miller

    • It's a steal
      30
    • I'm fine with that price but I'll miss him.
      147
    • Too much: worried about only 2 months of Miller vs a long career of ERod
      47


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 452
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I was for it when it happened. And I am perfectly fine with it now irrespective of how EdRod does in his career. The getting to the World Series in 2014 was much more important to me than anything that might happen down the road. And Miller was hugely successful, imho. And not only was the benefit from his play for us, but him NOT pitching for Detroit was as valuable. Detroit likely wins that series with Miller. This is no Frank Robinson/Milt Pappas, Glenn Davis/Curt Schilling deal no matter how successful EdRod might become.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that one would be popular.

I'd rather have him back knowing what I know now would be huge too. And I'd vote it. I believe Delmon could have hit him. And if not, Well. It would have spared me the pain of KC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But would he be this guy if the O's kept him?

Or would you keep him just to keep him from being this guy for the Red Sox?

I don't know what mineral and supplement regimen they have him on. He looks much bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was for it when it happened. And I am perfectly fine with it now irrespective of how EdRod does in his career. The getting to the World Series in 2014 was much more important to me than anything that might happen down the road. And Miller was hugely successful, imho. And not only was the benefit from his play for us, but him NOT pitching for Detroit was as valuable. Detroit likely wins that series with Miller. This is no Frank Robinson/Milt Pappas, Glenn Davis/Curt Schilling deal no matter how successful EdRod might become.

Jumping off that point, had we beaten KC in the ALCS, and made it to the Series, or won it, would that change anyone's opinion on the deal? That could have been what Duquette was thinking at the time. Back in July, he knew we were out Wieters; Hardy was a pending free agent; Davis and Chen, IMHO, are sure to test the market. In short, even though he had a surplus of young arms, 2014 could have been seen as a limited window to go all the way before having to rebuild the club in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jumping off that point, had we beaten KC in the ALCS, and made it to the Series, or won it, would that change anyone's opinion on the deal? That could have been what Duquette was thinking at the time. Back in July, he knew we were out Wieters; Hardy was a pending free agent; Davis and Chen, IMHO, are sure to test the market. In short, even though he had a surplus of young arms, 2014 could have been seen as a limited window to go all the way before having to rebuild the club in 2016.

Similarly, imagine if it had been reported that the O's turned down the trade then the O's lost to a Tigers team anchored in the bullpen by Andrew Miller in the ALDS, and now EdRod was still pitching in Double A at about the same level he did for Bowie last year while Wright etc. were pitching for the O's as well as they are now. People would be saying how DD had a surplus of pitching and was crazy not to part with a piece for a shot at a WS and how he should have gone for it. Hindsight--always 20/20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jumping off that point, had we beaten KC in the ALCS, and made it to the Series, or won it, would that change anyone's opinion on the deal? That could have been what Duquette was thinking at the time. Back in July, he knew we were out Wieters; Hardy was a pending free agent; Davis and Chen, IMHO, are sure to test the market. In short, even though he had a surplus of young arms, 2014 could have been seen as a limited window to go all the way before having to rebuild the club in 2016.

Excellent points! As difficult as it is to get in the Series, you have got to add the piece or two you feel will get you over the top. The timing was exactly right and with a few more wins we would have made it. If we had been in 3rd place and out of it, obviously you don't make that type of trade.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The undisputed worst trade in Baltimore history is when we traded Curt Schilling, Pete Harnisch and Steve Finley to the Astros for Glenn Davis.

Let's not forget that it took Schilling and Finley getting traded again before they turned into real stars. So that trade wasn't as bad as people make it out to be. Finley and Schilling were middling players that hadn't figured it out and Harnisch was actually the prize of the deal.

This is one is definitely more of an "F you Orioles" from the start. I see a big lefty that can sit in the mid 90's and command three pitches. I see C.C. Sabathia. If he ends up having a similar career, will that be worse than the Glenn trade?

Yes, I thought this deserved it's own thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's too early to classify this trade as one of the worst trades in team history.

Miller was a piece that helped greatly during the stretch run last year.

The Orioles are pretty deep in starting pitching and they dealt one of their prospects who has pitched really well for the Red Sox in a couple of starts.

The Orioles never won anything with davis, they went to the playoffs with Miller in the fold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This post would have a little more credibility if it were posted last summer when Miller was dominating the East and then subsequently the Tigers in the playoffs. Not too much talk about how bad the trade was back then when we were making our push toward the WS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I was at a meeting and came out to the Orioles down 1-0. I looked away for what seemed like a minute and it was 5-0, then 7-0. Do we know why Burnes was lifted after just 69 pitches after 5 innings? Was he hurt? Do we know why Cano was brought into the game in the 6th (Have to imagine his adrenaline may not have been as flowing at that stage of the game)?  Obviously the bullpen was pretty horrific last night, but could some of this be because Hyde was using guys who typically are late in game relievers in the 6th inning?  
    • Good point on the age.  I think it would have to be someone like Nate George from this year's draft just blowing up next year. The story would be how everyone missed on him because he played in a cold weather state.    
    • First, Schmidt is having a better year than Cole. Second, the O's teed off Ragans and Lugo last time they faced them.
    • Elias needs to use better judgement when he dumpster dives, prepare better for the high percentage chance that his dumpster diving pickups will fail, and increase usage of other means to get pieces. Bullpen usage is another problem, but it’s hard to effectively juggle flaming torches. A wrong move burns badly 
    • I can see the case for Mountcastle based on defense alone, but what has Kjerstad done to warrant that kind of treatment? Is it the .505 OPS he’s put up since coming back? The overall .438 ML OPS since getting hit in the head? I’m as bummed as anyone that his season got derailed, but if you’re talking about where they are right now — he’s not your huckleberry. As for O’Hearn, he’s 8 for his last 23 (.348), with 3 doubles. That feels a little like the “getting himself together” that you referenced. He had an awful month-long slump, but he also has an extended track record (over 1.5 seasons) of excelling in the role he’s now back in, as the platoon LH 1B/DH guy. He had a 125 wRC+ in those 750 PAs as an Oriole until 8/20, which is roughly when Mountcastle went out.  I’d be good with Kjerstad DHing against LH starters, because there’s good reason to think he hits them better than O’Hearn. And if they want to play both O’Hearn and Kjerstad against some RHPs, in order to set up the potential of Mountcastle coming in to PH against a lefty reliever, I’m down for that too. But the primary alignment is going to (and should) be the Mountcastle/O’Hearn duo we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing.
    • The Achilles heel for this team is going to be the unit that doesn't step up in the postseason. I can easily see scenarios where: the bullpen is hot and provides good performances but the offense sputters and isn't clutch the offense comes up big but the bullpen blows games late starting pitching tosses some clunkers (not really likely with Burnes and Eflin) and they can't recover the defense sucks and gives opponents extra outs to work with, blowing games open when the bullpen or SP would have been able to escape and continue We've seen all of these units falter at one point or another during this season.  We've also seen all of these units perform very well at different times throughout the season.  So, we'll see what turns out to be the Achilles heel for the Orioles in the playoffs starting next week.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...